Figure 1
Student Evaluations (Rating Item 1).
Table 1
Base Model, Person Model and Interaction Model (Rating Item 1).
| TERM | BASE MODEL | PERSON MODEL | INTERACTION MODEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| External Sharing | 0.98 [0.81, 1.20]; p = .865, adj. p = .865 | 0.98 [0.81, 1.20]; p = .864, adj. p = .931 | 1.65 [0.24, 11.14]; p = .610, adj. p = .648 |
| Group Presentation | 1.41 [1.15, 1.72]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 | 1.40 [1.15, 1.71]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 | 1.40 [1.15, 1.71]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 |
| Peer Feedback | 0.70 [0.58, 0.85]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 | 0.70 [0.58, 0.85]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 | 0.70 [0.57, 0.85]; p < .001, adj. p < .01 |
| Female | — | 1.27 [0.73, 2.22]; p = .403, adj. p = .539 | 1.42 [0.77, 2.61]; p = .257, adj. p = .569 |
| Semester | — | 1.05 [0.98, 1.12]; p = .156, adj. p = .390 | 1.02 [0.95, 1.10]; p = .532, adj. p = .646 |
| Extraversion | — | 1.11 [0.86, 1.43]; p = .431, adj. p = .539 | 1.16 [0.88, 1.54]; p = .279, adj. p = .569 |
| Agreeableness | — | 0.99 [0.73, 1.34]; p = .931, adj. p = .931 | 1.09 [0.78, 1.52]; p = .601, adj. p = .648 |
| Conscientiousness | — | 1.22 [0.89, 1.67]; p = .216, adj. p = .418 | 1.15 [0.82, 1.62]; p = .425, adj. p = .582 |
| Openness | — | 1.14 [0.91, 1.42]; p = .251, adj. p = .418 | 1.14 [0.90, 1.45]; p = .290, adj. p = .569 |
| Neuroticism | — | 0.75 [0.57, 0.99]; p = .041, adj. p = .136 | 0.78 [0.58, 1.06]; p = .118, adj. p = .414 |
| External Sharing × Extraversion | — | — | 0.90 [0.72, 1.12]; p = .361, adj. p = .569 |
| External Sharing × Agreeableness | — | — | 0.81 [0.62, 1.06]; p = .122, adj. p = .414 |
| External Sharing × Conscientiousness | — | — | 1.13 [0.86, 1.49]; p = .368, adj. p = .569 |
| External Sharing × Openness | — | — | 1.00 [0.83, 1.21]; p = .982, adj. p = .982 |
| External Sharing × Neuroticism | — | — | 0.91 [0.71, 1.16]; p = .445, adj. p = .582 |
| External Sharing × Semester | — | — | 1.05 [0.99, 1.12]; p = .074, adj. p = .414 |
| External Sharing × Female | — | — | 0.79 [0.49, 1.28]; p = .345, adj. p = .569 |
[i] Note. Values are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. p-values are reported before and after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Models were estimated using cumulative link mixed models with random intercepts for participants.
Table 2
Model Fit Statistics (Rating Item 1).
| MODEL | AIC | LogLik |
|---|---|---|
| Null Model | 3,709.65 | –1,849.83 |
| Base Model | 3,691.60 | –1,837.80 |
| Person Model | 3,690.20 | –1,830.10 |
| Sharing × Person Model | 3,694.57 | –1,825.29 |
Figure 2
Student Evaluations (Rating Item 2).
Table 3
Base Model, Person Model and Interaction Model (Rating Item 2).
| TERM | BASE MODEL | PERSON MODEL | INTERACTION MODEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| External Sharing | 2.43 [1.99, 2.96]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 | 2.42 [1.98, 2.96]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 | 0.20 [0.03, 1.38]; p = .103, adj. p = .427 |
| Group Presentation | 0.89 [0.73, 1.09]; p = .261, adj. p = .261 | 0.89 [0.73, 1.09]; p = .257, adj. p = .513 | 0.90 [0.74, 1.09]; p = .269, adj. p = .571 |
| Peer Feedback | 1.21 [1.00, 1.48]; p = .052, adj. p = .079 | 1.21 [1.00, 1.48]; p = .052, adj. p = .261 | 1.21 [1.00, 1.48]; p = .052, adj. p = .295 |
| Female | — | 1.27 [0.66, 2.45]; p = .470, adj. p = .784 | 1.18 [0.58, 2.39]; p = .645, adj. p = .803 |
| Semester | — | 1.00 [0.93, 1.09]; p = .947, adj. p = .947 | 0.97 [0.89, 1.06]; p = .530, adj. p = .803 |
| Extraversion | — | 1.27 [0.94, 1.71]; p = .118, adj. p = .393 | 1.28 [0.93, 1.77]; p = .125, adj. p = .427 |
| Agreeableness | — | 1.06 [0.74, 1.52]; p = .737, adj. p = .947 | 1.03 [0.70, 1.51]; p = .890, adj. p = .890 |
| Conscientiousness | — | 0.96 [0.66, 1.38]; p = .812, adj. p = .947 | 0.78 [0.52, 1.16]; p = .220, adj. p = .569 |
| Openness | — | 1.01 [0.78, 1.31]; p = .939, adj. p = .947 | 0.98 [0.74, 1.29]; p = .862, adj. p = .890 |
| Neuroticism | — | 0.79 [0.57, 1.09]; p = .158, adj. p = .395 | 0.81 [0.57, 1.15]; p = .234, adj. p = .569 |
| External Sharing × Extraversion | — | — | 0.98 [0.78, 1.22]; p = .840, adj. p = .890 |
| External Sharing × Agreeableness | — | — | 1.07 [0.82, 1.39]; p = .629, adj. p = .803 |
| External Sharing × Conscientiousness | — | — | 1.50 [1.14, 1.98]; p < .01, adj. p = .058 |
| External Sharing × Openness | — | — | 1.08 [0.89, 1.30]; p = .440, adj. p = .803 |
| External Sharing × Neuroticism | — | — | 0.95 [0.74, 1.21]; p = .662, adj. p = .803 |
| External Sharing × Semester | — | — | 1.06 [1.00, 1.13]; p = .041, adj. p = .295 |
| External Sharing × Female | — | — | 1.19 [0.74, 1.91]; p = .483, adj. p = .803 |
[i] Note. Values are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. p-values are reported before and after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Models were estimated using cumulative link mixed models with random intercepts for participants.
Table 4
Model Fit Statistics (Rating Item 2).
| MODEL | AIC | LogLik |
|---|---|---|
| Null Model | 3,934.79 | –1,962.39 |
| Base Model | 3,858.88 | –1,921.44 |
| Person Model | 3,864.65 | –1,917.32 |
| Sharing × Person Model | 3,861.55 | –1,908.78 |
Figure 3
Student Evaluations (Rating Item 3).
Table 5
Base Model, Person Model and Interaction Model (Rating Item 3).
| TERM | BASE MODEL | PERSON MODEL | INTERACTION MODEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| External Sharing | 8.11 [6.50, 10.13]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 | 8.09 [6.48, 10.11]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 | 0.09 [0.01, 0.60]; p = .013, adj. p = .043 |
| Group Presentation | 1.32 [1.09, 1.61]; p < .01, adj. p < .01 | 1.32 [1.09, 1.61]; p < .01, adj. p = .026 | 1.32 [1.09, 1.61]; p < .01, adj. p = .023 |
| Peer Feedback | 1.05 [0.86, 1.28]; p = .625, adj. p = .625 | 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p = .631, adj. p = .744 | 1.04 [0.85, 1.26]; p = .708, adj. p = .803 |
| Female | — | 1.77 [1.04, 3.02]; p = .034, adj. p = .108 | 2.06 [1.13, 3.75]; p = .019, adj. p = .054 |
| Semester | — | 1.04 [0.98, 1.11]; p = .197, adj. p = .281 | 1.03 [0.95, 1.10]; p = .488, adj. p = .638 |
| Extraversion | — | 1.28 [1.01, 1.63]; p = .043, adj. p = .108 | 1.31 [0.99, 1.72]; p = .056, adj. p = .129 |
| Agreeableness | — | 0.94 [0.70, 1.25]; p = .670, adj. p = .744 | 1.02 [0.73, 1.41]; p = .916, adj. p = .969 |
| Conscientiousness | — | 0.78 [0.58, 1.05]; p = .102, adj. p = .170 | 0.48 [0.34, 0.68]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 |
| Openness | — | 0.97 [0.79,1.20]; p = .797, adj. p = .797 | 0.80 [0.63, 1.01]; p = .061, adj. p = .129 |
| Neuroticism | — | 0.77 [0.60, 1.01]; p = .057, adj. p = .114 | 0.79 [0.59, 1.07]; p = .125, adj. p = .229 |
| External Sharing × Extraversion | — | — | 1.0 [0.80, 1.24]; p = .969, adj. p = .969 |
| External Sharing × Agreeableness | — | — | 0.82 [0.63, 1.07]; p = .147, adj. p = .229 |
| External Sharing × Conscientiousness | — | — | 2.68 [2.04, 3.52]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 |
| External Sharing × Openness | — | — | 1.52 [1.25, 1.84]; p < .001, adj. p < .001 |
| External Sharing × Neuroticism | — | — | 0.94 [0.74, 1.20]; p = .615, adj. p = .746 |
| External Sharing × Semester | — | — | 1.04 [0.98, 1.11]; p = .148, adj. p = .229 |
| External Sharing × Female | — | — | 0.79 [0.49, 1.27]; p = .327, adj. p = .463 |
[i] Note. Values are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. p-values are reported before and after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Models were estimated using cumulative link mixed models with random intercepts for participants.