Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses Cover

Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Correlation Matrix for Students Who Used Spark.

Note. Cells display Pearson correlation coefficients among four course-experience items: Q9 (advisement), Q10 (course organization), Q11 (relevance), and Q12 (clarity of instructions). Higher values indicate stronger positive associations between items. Scores are based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The full wording and descriptive statistics for these items are provided in Appendix A; together they demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88).

Figure 2

Correlation Matrix for Students Who Did Not Use Spark.

Note. Cells display Pearson correlation coefficients among four course-experience items: Q9 (advisement), Q10 (course organization), Q11 (relevance), and Q12 (clarity of instructions). Higher values indicate stronger positive associations between items. Scores are based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The full wording and descriptive statistics for these items are provided in Appendix A; together they demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88).

Figure 3

Average GPA by Spark Engagement Tier.

Note. Low, Medium, and High Spark-usage tiers are based on tertiles of Spark message counts; bars display mean course GPA on a 4.0 scale, and error bars represent standard errors. A one-way ANOVA indicated no statistically significant differences in GPA across tiers, F(2, 409) = 1.41, p = .24, η2 = .01, although mean GPAs increased from the Low (M = 3.15, n = 137) and Medium (M = 3.18, n = 138) tiers to the High tier (M = 3.36, n = 137). These tier-based results are interpreted as exploratory and descriptive rather than as evidence of a strong categorical effect of Spark usage on performance.

Figure 4

Average Engagement Scores (Q1, Q3, Q5) by Term and Spark Use.

Note. Scores are based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Spark usage is self-reported (Q46 > 0). The data show a growing divergence over time, with Spark users reporting consistently higher engagement starting in Fall 2024.

COLUMNQUESTION
Question 1I felt encouraged throughout the course.
Question 2I felt encouraged throughout the course. - <b>What made you feel encouraged or a lack of encouragement?</b>
Question 3I felt engaged throughout the course.
Question 4I felt engaged throughout the course. - <b>What made you feel engaged or a lack of engagement?</b>
Question 5I felt supported throughout the course.
Question 6I felt supported throughout the course. - <b>What made you feel supported or a lack of support? </b>
Question 7Student support services enabled me to successfully complete the course.
Question 8Student support services enabled me to successfully complete the course. - Comments:
Question 9I received an adequate level of academic advisement from my success coach.
Question 10The organization of the course content is intuitive.
Question 11I learned relevant information in this class that I can apply to my life.
Question 12Instructions for this course were clearly stated and easily understood.
Question 13Instructions for this course were clearly stated and easily understood. - Comments:
Question 14This course helped me better understand the relationship of a Christian Worldview to the content area of the course.
Question 15This course helped me better understand the relationship of a Christian Worldview to the content area of the course. - Comments:
Question 16This course helped me better understand the relationship of a Christian Worldview to my life and work in the world.
Question 17This course helped me better understand the relationship of a Christian Worldview to my life and work in the world. - Comments:
Question 18The learning activities and assignments promoted the achievement of the stated learning objectives.
Question 19The learning activities and assignments promoted the achievement of the stated learning objectives. - Comments:
Question 20On average, how many hours did you spend on this course (online and offline) per week?
Question 21Did you adopt an eTextbook for this course?
Question 22The tools and media supported the course learning objectives.
Question 23The tools and media supported the course learning objectives. - Comments:
Question 24My instructor used the grading criteria (rubrics) as a basis for evaluating my work.
Question 25My instructor used the grading criteria (rubrics) as a basis for evaluating my work. - Comments:
Question 26My instructor’s interactions made the course material interesting and relevant.
Question 27My instructor’s interactions made the course material interesting and relevant. - Comments:
Question 28My instructor’s feedback helped promote active learning.
Question 29My instructor’s feedback helped promote active learning. - Comments:
Question 30My instructor responded to my requests for assistance within one business day.
Question 31My instructor provided feedback on assignments within 5 business days.
Question 32My instructor demonstrated respect for the students.
Question 33My instructor demonstrated respect for the students. - Comments:
Question 34I was able to use the course communication tools effectively to communicate with my instructor.
Question 35Having the ability to schedule office hours with my instructor made me feel more supported.
Question 36How likely are you to take advantage of LAPU’s Inspire 10% tuition discount by referring a friend to study at LAPU?
Question 37Pay it forward. What advice would you give a future student to help them succeed in this course? (optional)
Question 38Pay it forward. If you found resources that particularly helped you, share them here so we can pass them along. (optional)
Question 39Additional comments you would like to provide. (optional)
Question 40Did you use Spark, the AI Course Assistant, while participating in your course?
Question 41What is the primary reason(s) you did not use Spark within your course?
Question 42Effectiveness of AI Assistant: The AI course assistant helped me understand course material and concepts.
Question 43Availability and Responsiveness: I am satisfied with the availability and responsiveness of the AI course assistant within the course.
Question 44Support and Clarification: The AI course assistant supported me in clarifying doubts and answering questions related to the coursework.
Question 45Integration with Learning Experience: The AI course assistant enhanced my overall learning experience in my course.
Question 46Approximately how many times did you utilize the AI course assistant within your course.
Question 47How many times did you connect with your Success Coach?
Question 48What is your expected grade outcome for the course?
Question 49Suggestions for Improvement: What improvements or additional features would you suggest for the AI assistant to support your learning experience better?&#160;(optional)
Language: English
Page range: 233 - 253
Submitted on: Aug 9, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 17, 2026
Published on: Jun 2, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Frans Flores, Kenna Norman, George Hanshaw, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.