‘GenAI’ Literature Search Tools and Scholarly Diversity: An Algorithmic Ethnographical Analysis
References
- Alonso, J. (2025, April 23). Collection of free education research may lose funding. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from Inside Higher Ed
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2025/04/23/collection-free-education-research-may-lose-funding - Anis, S., & French, J. A. (2023). Efficient, explicatory, and equitable: Why qualitative researchers should embrace AI, but cautiously. Business & Society, 62(6), 1139–1144. 10.1177/00076503231163286
- Bendels, M. H. K., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLOS ONE, 13(1),
e0189136 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136 - Bjelobaba, S., Waddington, L., Perkins, M., Foltýnek, T., & Weber-Wulff, D. (2024). Research integrity and GenAI: A systematic analysis of ethical challenges across research phases. arXiv. 10.48550/arxiv.2412.10134
- Bol, J. A., Sheffel, A., Zia, N., & Meghani, A. (2023). How to address the geographical bias in academic publishing. BMJ Global Health, 8(12). 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013111
- Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1–10. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
- Bozkurt, A. (2025). Algorithmically manufactured minds: Generative and agentic AI in a time of post-truth, reconfiguration of student agency and death of critical pedagogy. Open Praxis, 17(2), 206–210. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.792
- Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., … Asino, T. I. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487–513. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777
- Byrnes, J., & Spear, A. (2023). Epistemic injustice and algorithmic epistemic injustice in healthcare. International Conference On Computer Ethics. Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, IL: International Conference on Computer Ethics, pp. 1–4.
May 16–18, 2023 , Chicago, IL, United States.https://journals.library.iit.edu/index.php/Soremoindex.php/CEPE2023/article/view/238 - Caliandro, A. (2018). Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 551–578. 10.1177/0891241617702960
- Castelvecchi, D. (2016). Can we open the black box of AI? Nature News, 538(7623), 20. 10.1038/538020a
- Castillo-Segura, P., Alario-Hoyos, C., Kloos, C. D., & Fernandez Panadero, C. (2023). Leveraging the potential of generative AI to accelerate systematic literature reviews: An example in the area of educational technology. IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum and Global Engineering Deans Council: Convergence for a Better World: A Call to Action, WEEF-GEDC 2023- Proceedings.
October 23–27, 2023 . Monterrey, Mexico. 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.10344098 - Cellard, L. (2022). Algorithms as figures: Towards a post-digital ethnography of algorithmic contexts. New Media & Society, 24(4), 982–1000. 10.1177/14614448221079032
- Christin, A. (2020a). Algorithmic ethnography, during and after COVID-19. Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 108–111. 10.1177/2057047320959850
- Christin, A. (2020b). The ethnographer and the algorithm: Beyond the black box. Theory and Society, 49(5), 897–918. 10.1007/s11186-020-09411-3
- Consensus. (n.d.). Less noise. More knowledge. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from
https://consensus.app/home/about-us/ - Cox, A., & Abbott, P. (2021). Librarians’ perceptions of the challenges for researchers in Rwanda and the potential of open scholarship. Libri, 71(2), 93–107. 10.1515/libri-2020-0036
- Czerniewicz, L., Goodier, S., & Morrell, R. (2017). Southern knowledge online? Climate change research discoverability and communication practices. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 386–405. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168473
- Czerniewicz, L., & Wiens, K. (2013). The online visibility of South African knowledge: Searching for poverty alleviation. The African Journal of Information and Communication (Online), 13. 10.23962/10539/19274
- Decker, S. (2025, April 15). Guest post – The open access – AI conundrum: Does free to read mean free to train? The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved May 10, 2025, from
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/04/15/guest-post-the-open-access-ai-conundrum-does-free-to-read-mean-free-to-train/ - Dhingra, H., Jayashanker, P., Moghe, S., & Strubell, E. (2023). Queer people are people first: Deconstructing sexual identity stereotypes in large language models. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2307.00101
- Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115–138. 10.1080/02691728.2013.782585
- Elicit Help Center. (n.d.). Information and advice from the Elicit team. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from
https://support.elicit.com/en/articles/552705 - Elsevier. (2025). Scopus AI: Explore. Focus. Advance. Retrieved July 18, 2025. from
https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/products/scopus/scopus-ai - Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. L. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research: A social justice perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 5(2), 69–83. 10.33043/jsacp.5.2.69-83
- Fischer, G., Lundin, J., & Lindberg, J. O. (2020). Rethinking and reinventing learning, education and collaboration in the digital age—from creating technologies to transforming cultures. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 241–252. 10.1108/IJILT-04-2020-0051
- Fricker, M. (2008). Forum: Miranda Fricker’s Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Theoria, An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 23(1), 69–71. 10.1387/theoria.7
- Gabriel, S. (2024). Generative AI and educational (in)equity. Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024, 4(1), 133–142.
December 5–6. 2024 . Lisbon, Portugal. 10.34190/icair.4.1.3153 - Gerasimov, I., KC, B., Mehrabian, A., Acker, J., & McGuire, M. P. (2024). Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite. Scientometrics, 129(7), 3681–3704. 10.1007/s11192-024-05073-5
- Gillespie, T. (2016).
#Trendingistrending: When algorithms become culture . In R. Seyfert & J. Roberge (Eds.), Algorithmic Cultures: Essays on Meaning, Performance and New Technologies (pp. 52–75). Routledge. - Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Bajić, N. S., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2025). Gender disparities in first authorship: Examining the Matilda effect across communication, political science, and sociology. Scientometrics, 130(5), 2947–2961. 10.1007/s11192-025-05303-4
- Gupta, A., Atef, Y., Mills, A., & Bali, M. (2024). Assistant, parrot, or colonizing loudspeaker? ChatGPT metaphors for developing critical AI literacies. Open Praxis, 16(1), 37–53. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.631
- Heck, T., Keller, C., & Rittberger, M. (2024). Coverage and similarity of bibliographic databases to find most relevant literature for systematic reviews in education. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 25(2), 365–376. 10.1007/s00799-023-00364-3
- Hengel, E. (2022). Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. The Economic Journal, 132(648), 2951–2991. 10.1093/ej/ueac032
- Hernandez, A. (2023). Epistemic oppression and affective exclusion: A pragmatist approach. Passion: Journal of the European Philosophical Society for the Study of Emotions, 1(2), 154–168. 10.59123/passion.v1i2.13804
- Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
- Jordan, K., & Tsai, S. P. (2024). Keywords, citations and ‘algorithm magic’: Exploring assumptions about ranking in academic literature searches online. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–15. 10.1080/17439884.2024.2392108
- Kay, J., Kasirzadeh, A., & Mohamed, S. (2025). Epistemic injustice in generative AI. In S. Das, B. P. Green, K. Varshney, M. Ganapini, & A. Renda (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 7, pp. 684–697.
October 21–23, 2024 . San Jose, California, USA. Available at:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3716662.3716722 - Khisro, J., & Fenlon, K. (2025). Equity in public access to scientific research results: Insights from federal agency responses to the Nelson Memorandum Policy. Proceedings of the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2144–2153.
January 7–10. 2025 . Big Island, Hawaii. 10.24251/hicss.2025.263 - Kulczycki, E. (2023). The evaluation game: How publication metrics shape scholarly communication. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009351218
- Kumar, S., & Gunn, A. (2024). Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in the literature review process. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1395–1408. 10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049
- Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. 10.1038/504211a
- Li, M., Enkhtur, A., Yamamoto, B. A., Cheng, F., & Chen, L. (2025). Potential societal biases of ChatGPT in higher education: A scoping review. Open Praxis, 17(1), 79–94. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.750
- Marshall, G., & Jonker, L. (2010). An introduction to descriptive statistics: A review and practical guide. Radiography, 16(4), e1–e7. 10.1016/j.radi.2010.01.001
- Mei, K. X., Fereidooni, S., & Caliskan, A. (2023). Bias against 93 stigmatized groups in masked language models and downstream sentiment classification tasks. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency, pp. 1699–1710.
June 12–15. 2023 . Chicago, USA. 10.1145/3593013.3594109 - Mills, D., Kingori, P., Branford, A., Chatio, S., Robinson, N., & Tindana, P. (2023). Who counts? Ghanaian academic publishing and global science. African Minds. 10.47622/9781928502647
- Mozelius, P., & Humble, N. (2024). On the use of Generative AI for literature reviews: An exploration of tools and techniques. Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, pp. 161–168.
July 4–5. 2024 . Porto, Portugal. 10.34190/ecrm.23.1.2528 - Onken, J., Chang, L., & Kanwal, F. (2021). Unconscious bias in peer review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 19(3), 419–420. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.001
- Oza, A. (2023, December 22). Citations show gender bias—And the reasons are surprising. Nature. 10.1038/d41586-023-03474-9
- Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x
- Pollock, D., & Michael, A. (2024, December 10). News and Views: How much content can AI legally exploit? Delta Think. Retrieved May 10, 2025, from
https://www.deltathink.com/news-and-views-how-much-content-can-ai-legally-exploit - Ray, K. S., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., Bassett, D. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. Accountability in Research, 31(2), 158–172. 10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257
- ResearchRabbit. (2025). Reimagine research. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from
https://www.researchrabbit.ai - Rycroft-Smith, L., & Macey, D. (2025). All sizzle, no steak: AI tools are not able to act as credible knowledge brokers by summarising evidence in mathematics education. In T. Fujita (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, pp. 1–6.
March 1, 2025 . Online.https://bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/BSRLM-CP-45-1-10.pdf - Schoeb, D., Suarez-Ibarrola, R., Hein, S., Dressler, F. F., Adams, F., Schlager, D., & Miernik, A. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence for medical literature search: Randomized controlled trial using the hackathon format. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 9(1),
e16606 . 10.2196/16606 - Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 205395171773810. 10.1177/2053951717738104
- Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes, European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. 10.1111/ejed.12532
- Semantic Scholar. (n.d.). Our product. Retrieved July 18, 2025. from
https://www.semanticscholar.org/product - Spillias, S., Tuohy, P., Andreotta, M., Annand-Jones, R., Boschetti, F., Cvitanovic, C., Duggan, J., Fulton, E. A., Karcher, D. B., Paris, C., Shellock, R., & Trebilco, R. (2024). Human-AI collaboration to identify literature for evidence synthesis. Cell Reports Sustainability, 1(7), 100132. 10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100132
- Tlili, A., Bond, M., Bozkurt, A., Arar, K., Chiu, T. K. F., & Rospigliosi, P. ‘Asher’. (2025). Academic integrity in the generative AI (GenAI) era: A collective editorial response. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(3), 1819–1822. 10.1080/10494820.2025.2471198
- von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021). Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust AI. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1607–1622. 10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0
- Wanyama, S. B., McQuaid, R. W., & Kittler, M. (2022). Where you search determines what you find: The effects of bibliographic databases on systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 409–422. 10.1080/13645579.2021.1892378
- Wellmon, C., & Piper, A. (2017). Publication, power, and patronage: On inequality and academic publishing. Critical Inquiry. 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.4558072.V1
- White, D. (2025, March 11). Agency vs Efficiency (The AI learning gambit). David White: Digital and Education. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from
https://daveowhite.com/aigambit/ - Whitfield, S., & Hofmann, M. A. (2023). Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly, 19(3), 201–207. 10.1080/15228959.2023.2224125
- Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024). Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10), 1839–1850. 10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5
- Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90–112. 10.1111/bjet.13370
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.18.2.970 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 291 - 309
Submitted on: Jul 31, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2026
Published on: Jun 2, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Kathy M. Chandler, Katy Jordan, Ishaq Al-Naabi, Panagiota Tzanni, Leone Gately, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.