Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring the Experiences of Online and Distance Learners with Visual Impairments in Regard to AI-Assisted Narration Cover

Exploring the Experiences of Online and Distance Learners with Visual Impairments in Regard to AI-Assisted Narration

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Adnin, R., & Das, M. (2024, October). “I look at it as the king of knowledge”: How Blind People Use and Understand Generative AI Tools. Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 114. 10.1145/3663548.3675631
  2. Almufareh, M. F., Kausar, S., Humayun, M., & Tehsin, S. (2024). A conceptual model for inclusive technology: Advancing disability inclusion through artificial intelligence. Journal of Disability Research, 3(1), Article 20230060. 10.57197/jdr-2023-0060
  3. Amponsah, S., & Bekele, T. A. (2023). Exploring strategies for including visually impaired students in online learning. Education And Information Technologies, 28(8), 93559377. 10.1007/s10639-022-11145-x
  4. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  5. Bozkurt, A. (2025). Anadolu University. In: S. Mishra & S. Panda (Eds.), Handbook of Open Universities Around the World. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003478195-53
  6. Bragg, D., Reinecke, K., & Ladner, R. E. (2021). Expanding a large inclusive study of human listening rates. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 14(3), 126. 10.1145/3461700
  7. Chan, C., & Kuang, J. (2024, July). Exploring the accuracy of prosodic encodings in state-of-the-art text-to-speech models. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024, 2731. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-6
  8. Choi, D., Kwak, D., Cho, M., & Lee, S. (2020, April). “Nobody speaks that fast!” An empirical study of speech rate in conversational agents for people with vision impairments. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 113. 10.1145/3313831.3376569
  9. Elshaer, I. A., AlNajdi, S. M., & Salem, M. A. (2025). Measuring the Impact of large language models on academic success and quality of life among students with visual disability: An assistive technology perspective. Bioengineering, 12(10). 10.3390/bioengineering12101056
  10. Filipova, E. (2025). Enhancing educational accessibility for visually impaired individuals through artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Computer Applications, 186(67), 2532. 10.5120/ijca2025924481
  11. Flores-Saviaga, C., Hanrahan, B. V., Imteyaz, K., Clarke, S., & Savage, S. (2025, April). The impact of generative AI coding assistants on developers who are visually impaired. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 117. 10.1145/3706598.3714008
  12. Guddad, P. (2025). Challenges faced by the visually impaired students during online learning: lessons for teachers. Dibon Journal of Education, 1(1), 112. 10.64169/dje.6
  13. Inamdar, F. M., Ambesange, S., Mane, R., Hussain, H., Wagh, S., & Lakhe, P. (2023). Voice cloning using artificial intelligence and machine learning: A review. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44, 419427. https://jazindia.com/index.php/jaz/article/view/2721/2200
  14. Kane, J., Johnstone, M. N., & Szewczyk, P. (2024). Voice synthesis improvement by machine learning of natural prosody. Sensors, 24(5), 1624. 10.3390/s24051624
  15. Kim, J., Merrill, K. Jr., Xu, K., & Kelly, S. (2022). Perceived credibility of an AI instructor in online education: The role of social presence and voice features. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107383. 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107383
  16. Kocdar, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). Supporting learners with special needs in open, distance, and digital education. In: O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_49-1
  17. Koranteng, U. (2025). AI and assistive technology in special education: Transforming learning access for students with disabilities. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(9), 240252. 10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i92361
  18. Leong, W. K., Chew, Y. Y., Zulkifli, B., & Kho, S. N. (2023). Perception of university students towards the use of artificial intelligence-generated voice in explainer videos. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 7789. https://fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/SEARCH/SEARCH-2023-Special-Issue-SEARCH-Conf2022/SEARCH-2023-P6–15-SEARCHConf2022.pdf
  19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  20. Marquez-Carpintero, L., Gomez-Donoso, F., Bauer, Z., Dominguez-Dager, B., Belmonte-Baeza, A., Pina-Navarro, M., Morillas-Espejo, F., Escalona, F., & Cazorla, M. (2025). AIDEN: Design and pilot study of an AI assistant for the visually impaired. ArXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2511.0608
  21. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108894333.003
  22. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  23. Mogali, S. R., Ng, O., Tan, J. X., San, T. H., & Ng, K. B. (2024). Voice-over anatomy lectures created by AI-voice cloning technology: A descriptive article. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(9), 16861693. 10.1002/ase.2524
  24. Mukhtar, S., Shahbaz, G. Q., & Akmal, F. (2025). Exploring AI-enabled educational support systems for blind and visually impaired students. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 4(01), 22362247.
  25. Pacheco, E., Lips, M., & Yoong, P. (2018). Transition 2.0: Digital technologies, higher education, and vision impairment. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 110. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.11.001
  26. Papadopoulos, K., Katemidou, E., Koutsoklenis, A., & Mouratidou, E. (2010). Differences among sighted individuals and individuals with visual impairments in word intelligibility presented via synthetic and natural Speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(4), 278288. 10.3109/07434618.2010.522200
  27. Papadopoulos, K., Koutsoklenis, A., Katemidou, E., & Okalidou, A. (2009). Perception of Synthetic and Natural Speech by Adults with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(7), 403414. 10.1177/0145482X0910300704
  28. Pi, Z., Deng, L., Wang, X., Guo, P., Xu, T., & Zhou, Y. (2022). The influences of a virtual instructor’s voice and appearance on learning from video lectures. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 17031713. 10.1111/jcal.12704
  29. Pias, S. B. H., Huang, R., Williamson, D. S., Kim, M., & Kapadia, A. (2024, July). The impact of perceived tone, age, and gender on voice assistant persuasiveness in the context of product recommendations. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on conversational user interfaces, pp. 115. 10.1145/3640794.3665545
  30. Pucher, M., Zillinger, B., Toman, M., Schabus, D., Valentini-Botinhao, C., Yamagishi, J., Schmid, E., & Woltron, T. (2017). Influence of speaker familiarity on blind and visually impaired children’s and young adults’ perception of synthetic voices. Computer Speech & Language, 46, 179195. 10.1016/j.csl.2017.05.010
  31. Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
  32. Shaheen, N. L. (2025). Blind and low-vision students as surveyors of in/accessibility in technology-mediated formal education. Learning, Media and Technology, 114. 10.1080/17439884.2025.2462911
  33. Sharma, T., Tseng, Y. Y., Zhang, L., Ide, A., Mack, K. A., Findlater, L., … & Wang, Y. (2025, October). “Before, I Asked My Mom, Now I Ask ChatGPT”: Visual privacy management with generative AI for blind and low-vision people. Proceedings of the 27th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 114. 10.1145/3663547.3746335
  34. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
  35. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, (pp. 1930). Cambridge University Press, (1st ed.). New York. USA. 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.003
  36. Tlili, A., Altinay, F., Huang, R., Bozkurt, A., Burgos, D., Shehata, B., Altinay, Z., Wang, H., & Sani-Bozkurt, S. (2024). Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education and Their Relation to the Sustainable Development Goals: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Heading? In: D. Burgos, J. W. Branch, A. Tlili, R. Huang, M. Jemni, C. M. Stracke, C. D. L. Higuera, C. Looi, & K. Berrada (Eds.), Radical Solutions for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Education (pp. 2745). Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-97-8638-1_3
  37. Tsouktakou, A., Hamouroudis, A., & Chorti, A. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in the education of people with visual impairment. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 13(1), 734744. 10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.1.0481
  38. Uçar, H., Koçdar, S., Erdogdu, E., & Bozkurt, A. (2026). Transforming lives through inclusive open and distance education: a phenomenological study of learner narratives. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 114. 10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2025-0097
  39. Walczak, A., & Fryer, L. (2017). Creative description: The impact of audio description style on presence in visually impaired audiences. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 35(1), 617. 10.1177/0264619616661603
  40. Walczak, A., & Fryer, L. (2018). Vocal delivery of audio description by genre: Measuring users’ presence. Perspectives, 26(1), 6983. 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1298634
  41. Wilkens, L. (2025). Using videos in higher education: Experiences of students with visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment. 10.1177/02646196251322134
  42. Yang, C., & Taele, P. (2025). AI for accessible education: Personalized audio-based learning for blind students. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2504.17117
  43. Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods, 5(14), 359386.
  44. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage.
  45. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 6470. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Language: English
Page range: 365 - 380
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2026
Published on: Jun 2, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Seçil Kaya Gülen, Nedime Selin Çöpgeven, Gamze Tuna Büyükköse, Erdem Erdoğdu, Hasan Uçar, Mesut Aydemir, Mustafa Doğuş, Süleyman Arı, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.