Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Same Course, Open vs. Print: Learning, Access, and Perception Cover

Same Course, Open vs. Print: Learning, Access, and Perception

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Mapping of survey questions to cleaned column names.

ORIGINAL SURVEY QUESTIONCLEANED COLUMN NAME
What is your preferred mode of studying?Q1_Preferred_Study_Mode
What type of textbook did you primarily use for this course?Q2_Textbook_Type_Used
Have you used open online textbooks in any other courses before?Q3_Prior_Open_Textbook_Experience
The textbook provided clear explanations of key concepts.Q4_Clear_Explanations
The textbook helped me understand difficult topics in biology.Q4_Understanding_Difficult_Topics
The textbook included useful examples or applications of biological concepts.Q4_Useful_Examples
I feel the textbook contributed to my overall success in this course.Q4_Overall_Success_Contribution
How often did you use the textbook to prepare for class or exams?Q5_Textbook_Use_Preparation_Frequency
Did you find the textbook to be effective for completing assignments or studying?Q6_Textbook_Effectiveness_Assignments_Studying
Text readabilityQ7_Engagement_Text_Readability
Visual design (e.g., images, tables)Q7_Engagement_Visual_Design
Navigation (e.g., ease of finding sections/topics)Q7_Engagement_Navigation_Ease
To what extent did the textbook enhance your ability to connect with course material?Q8_Textbook_Enhancement_Course_Connection
To what extent did the textbook contribute to retaining information for exams?Q9_Textbook_Contribution_Retention
Did you use any interactive features in the textbook?Q10_Used_Interactive_Features
How often did you use these features?Q11_Interactive_Feature_Usage_Frequency
How useful were these features for your learning?Q12_Interactive_Feature_Usefulness
Understanding key conceptsQ13_Effectiveness_Understanding
Retaining information for examsQ13_Effectiveness_Retention
Applying concepts to assignmentsQ13_Effectiveness_ApplyingConcepts
Revising or reviewing materialQ13_Effectiveness_Reviewing
Other (Effectiveness – write-in)Q13_Effectiveness_Other
How accessible did you find the textbook?Q15_Textbook_Accessibility
Which type of textbook would you prefer for future courses?Q16_Textbook_Preference_Futur
Did you find the textbook distracting compared to other types of textbooks you’ve used?Q17_Textbook_Distracting
Overall, how satisfied were you with the textbook you used?Q18_Overall_Satisfaction
Figure 1

Comparison of (a) accessibility and (b) satisfaction between students using online and traditional textbook.

(a) Perceived accessibility by textbook type. (b) Overall satisfaction by textbook type.

Figure 2

Panel (a) shows students’ ratings of textbook effectiveness for studying, indicating comparable perceptions for online and traditional formats. panel (b) presents textbook format preferences for future courses, showing a tendency toward open online materials or mixed-format use.

(a) Perceived effectiveness of textbook for studying. (b) Preferred textbook format for future courses.

Figure 3

Summary of student performance across online and traditional textbook groups. while median scores were comparable, online users showed greater grade variability, achieving more a’s and f’s.

(a) Comparison of final course marks by textbook type. (b) Distribution of letter grades by textbook type.

Table 2

Distribution of final course grades by textbook format. the online group had more a– and a+ grades, but also more failing grades (f). traditional students were more concentrated in the mid-grade range (b and c).

CATEGORYGRADEONLINETRADITIONAL
HIGHA+53
A35
A-116
MIDB+22
B916
B–39
C+75
C515
C–75
LOWD52
F146
Figure 4

Distribution of scores (marks) between the online textbook users.

(a) Distribution of final scores for online textbook users. (b) Distribution of final scores for traditional users.

Table 3

Summary of key findings across textbook formats.

OUTCOMERESULTp-valueINTERPRETATION
AccessibilityOnline rated higherp = 0.013Statistically significant
SatisfactionComparablep = 0.396Slightly higher for online
EffectivenessComparablep = 0.757No difference
Future PreferenceComparablep = 0.63Most prefer online/mix
Academic PerformanceComparablep = 0.30No disadvantage for online
Effect SizeCohen’s d = –0.25Small, negligible
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 65
Submitted on: Sep 5, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2025
Published on: Feb 24, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Natasha Ramroop Singh, C. O. K. Ayisha Najeeha, Olivia Mendez Romero, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.