Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Elements for Excellence in the Design of OER Textbooks: User Research, Expert Peer Reviews, and Accessibility Testing Cover

Elements for Excellence in the Design of OER Textbooks: User Research, Expert Peer Reviews, and Accessibility Testing

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Adamiak, J. P. (2024). Applying threshold concepts strategies to teaching computing students in an ODL context. Open Praxis, 16(2), 225236. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.552
  2. Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student’s performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3(1). 10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
  3. Atkinson, S. P., & Fields, A. (2023). The continued importance of Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 27(1), 14. 10.61468/jofdl.v27i1.597
  4. Azfal, M. M. (2020). Supporting non-traditional students in online environments: A literature review. Iris Journal of Scholarship, 2, 612. 10.15695/iris.v2i0.4818
  5. Babbie, E. (2007). Survey research. In E. Babbie (Ed.), The Practice of Social Research, (11th ed., pp. 243284). Thomson/Wadsworth.
  6. Beckwith, N. (2023). Barriers for non-traditional students in higher education. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 34(2), 7579.
  7. Bliss, T. J., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1), 7. 10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
  8. Bozkurt, A., Uçar, H., & Koçdar, S. (2025). Mapping minds in motion: A scholarly voyage and evaluation of research trends and patterns in Open Praxis. Open Praxis, 17(1), 18. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.896
  9. Bozzetti, A., De Luigi, N., & Vergolini, L. (2024). Non-traditional students between online and offline: Which way forward for higher education? Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(2), 131166. 10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2024-2-7
  10. Branch, J. L. (2000). Investigating the information-seeking processes of adolescents: The value of using think alouds and think afters. Library & Information Science Research, 22(4), 371392. 10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00051-7
  11. Brandle, S., Katz, S., Hays, A., Beth, A., Cooney, C., DiSanto, J., Miles, L., & Morrison, A. (2019). But what do the students think: Results of the CUNY cross-campus zero-textbook cost student survey. Open Praxis, 11(1), 85101. 10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.932
  12. Buczynski, J. A. (2007). Faculty begin to replace textbooks with “freely” accessible online resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 169179. 10.1300/J136v11n04_11
  13. Cobern, W. W., & Adams, B. A. J. (2020). Establishing survey validity: A practical guide. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 404419. 10.21449/ijate.781366
  14. Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E., & Park, H. (2018). The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262276.
  15. Cooney, C. (2017). What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(4), 155178. 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3111
  16. Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, 45. 10.11120/plan.2006.00170004
  17. Crawford, K., & Huling, H. M. (2024). The art of connection: Humanizing teaching and learning in online classes. In L. E. Gray & S. Dunn (Eds.), Incorporating the human element in online teaching and learning (pp. 7294). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/979-8-3693-4131-5.ch004
  18. Croteau, E. (2017). Measures of student success with textbook transformations: The affordable learning Georgia initiative. Open Praxis, 9(1), 93108. 10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.505
  19. Culduz, M. (2024). Benefits and challenges of e-learning, online education, and distance learning. In L. E. Gray & S. Dunn (Eds.), Incorporating the human element in online teaching and learning (pp. 127). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/979-8-3693-4131-5.ch001
  20. DiSanto, J. M., Cummings-Clay, D., Mitchell, S., & Ford, M. (2019). Beyond saving money: Engaging multiple stakeholders is a key to OER success. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 2(1), 227238. 10.18278/ijoer.2.1.14
  21. Dotta, L. T., Leite, C., & Lopes, A. (2020). Entering higher education after 30: What can be learned from biographical narratives of non-traditional students. Studia Paedagogica, 25(4), 115134. 10.5817/SP2020-4-6
  22. Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2. Available from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ992490.pdf
  23. Fischer, L., Belikov, O., Ikahihifo, T. K., Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., & Troy Martin, M. (2020). Academic librarians examination of university students’ and faculty’s perceptions of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 12(3), 399415. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1081
  24. Heck, T., Kullmann, S., Hiebl, J., Schröder, N., Otto, D., & Sander, P. (2020). Designing open informational ecosystems on the concept of open educational resources. Open Education Studies, 2, 252264. 10.1515/edu-2020-0130
  25. Heider, K. L. (2021). Isolation, Burnout, and a Lost Sense of Belonging: Combating the Challenges of Distance Education during a Pandemic. Distance Learning: For Educators, Trainers, and Leaders, 18(1).
  26. Highton, M., Fresen, J., & Wild, J. (2011). Making academic OER easy: Reflections on technology and openness at Oxford University. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 2840. 10.61468/jofdl.v15i2.49
  27. Hilton, J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Williams, L. (2016). Maintaining momentum toward graduation: OER and the course Throughput rate. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 1827. 10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2686
  28. Hope, S. M. (2007). Searching the Web: A think aloud investigation into college students’ online behavior. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
  29. Hunsicker-Walburn, M., Guyot, W., Meier, R., Beavers, L., Stainbrook, M., & Schneweis, M. (2018). Students’ perceptions of OER quality. Economics & Business Journal: Inquiries & Perspectives, 9(1), 4255.
  30. Irvine, J., Kimmons, R., & Rogers, J. (2021). Recognizing and overcoming obstacles: What it will take to realize the potential of OER. EDUCAUSE Review (Online).
  31. Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannans, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(3), 113. 10.5334/jime.549
  32. Jhangiani, R. S. (2019, April 11). 5Rs for open pedagogy [blog]. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://thatpsychprof.com/5rs-for-open-pedagogy.
  33. Jung, I., & Lee, J. (2022). Open thinking as a learning outcome of open education: Scale development and validation. Distance Education, 43(1), 119138. 10.1080/01587919.2021.2020620
  34. Katz, S., & Van Allen, J. (2022). Open with intention: Situating equity pedagogy within open education to advance social justice. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(5), 421429. 10.1108/JME-07-2022-0089
  35. Kurek, M. (2016). Addressing cultural diversity in preparing teachers for openness: Culturally sensitive appropriation of open content. ALSIC: Apprentissage Des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 19(1). 10.4000/alsic.2904
  36. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Research.
  37. LeMire, S. (2024). Adult learning and open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 12(1), 114. 10.1080/02680513.2024.2311768
  38. Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. (1994). The thinking aloud method. In C. Lewis & J. Rieman (Eds.), Task-centered user interface design: A practical introduction (section 5.5). Retrieved 9 September 2025 from http://hcibib.org/tcuid/
  39. Lin, H. (2019). Teaching and learning without a textbook: Undergraduate student perceptions of open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(3). 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4224
  40. Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2025). Accessible and inclusive online learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 37(3), 13061329. 10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2
  41. Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 35(2), 140158. 10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
  42. Magro, J., & Tabaei, S. V. (2020). Results from a psychology OER pilot program: Faculty and student perceptions, cost savings, and academic outcomes. Open Praxis, 12(1), 8399. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1007
  43. Majeed, Z. (2018). Usability and accessibility of OERs and MOOCs among students with special needs in open and distance Learning. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 4(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267246.pdf
  44. Marghalani, A., & York, C. S. (2021). Online courses accessibility for low vision. Distance Learning, 18(3), 113.
  45. Martin, M. T., Belikov, O. M., Hilton, J., III, Wiley, D., & Fischer, L. (2017). Analysis of student and faculty perceptions of textbook costs in higher education. Open Praxis, 9(1), 7991. 10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.432
  46. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning theory and practice – 10 years on (pp. 116). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  47. Moon, J., & Park, Y. (2021). A scoping review on open educational resources to support interactions of learners with disabilities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 314341. 10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.5110
  48. Nagle, C., & Vitez, K. (2020). Fixing the broken textbook market. The Student Public Interest Groups. https://pirg.org/edfund/resources/fixing-the-broken-textbook-market-second-edition/
  49. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates. United States Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015025.pdf
  50. Navarrete, R., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Bridging the accessibility gap in Open Educational Resources. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(4), 755774. 10.1007/s10209-017-0529-9
  51. Nguyen, D. J., & Herron, A. (2021). Keeping up with the Joneses or feeling priced out?: Exploring how low-income students’ financial position shapes sense of belonging. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 429440. 10.1037/dhe0000191
  52. Olivier, J. (2020). Self-directed open educational practices for a decolonized South African curriculum: A process of localization for learning. Je-LKS: Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(4). 10.20368/1971-8829/1135330
  53. Park, J.–H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 207217.
  54. Pearce, L., Lin Hanick, S., Hofer, A., Townsend, L., & Willi Hooper, M. (2022). Your discomfort is valid: Big feelings and open pedagogy. Knowledge Cultures, 10(2), 2451. 10.22381/kc10220222
  55. Read, K., Tang, H., Dhamija, A., & Bodily, B. (2020). Understanding the impact of OER courses in relation to student socioeconomic status and employment. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(1), 4772. 10.18278/ijoer.3.1.5
  56. Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452226651
  57. San José State University [SJSU], School of Information. (2024a). MLIS program performance: Student exit survey data. https://ischool.sjsu.edu/mlis-program-performance#exit-survey
  58. San José State University [SJSU], School of Information. (2024b). Student experience–MLIS. https://ischool.sjsu.edu/mlis-student-experience
  59. Sapir, A. (2022). What student support practitioners know about non-traditional students: A practice-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(6). 10.1080/07294360.2021.1946015
  60. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition [SPARC]. (2017). OER myth busting. SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/ourwork/oer-mythbusting/
  61. Schroeder, N., & Donat, S. (2023). ‘Give and Take’ – higher education teachers using open educational resources. Research in Learning Technology, 31. 10.25304/rlt.v31.2916
  62. Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M.-L., Fisseler, B., & Stürmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 228246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24571989. 10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x
  63. Stracke, C. M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). Open educational resources and their global needs, benefits and practices: The call for a future research agenda. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 23(1), 2023. 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_12-1
  64. Timmermans, J. (2010). Changing our minds: The developmental potential of threshold concepts. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning (Educational Futures, 42, pp. 319. Sense Publishers. 10.1163/9789460912078_002
  65. Tucker, V. M. (2018). Threshold concepts and information experience in IL professional education: Curriculum design for online learning. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 810, 749758. 10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_76
  66. Tucker, V. M., & Perucci, C. (2025). Experiential learning about database design in the MLIS curriculum: Software and instructional design for threshold knowledge. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 66(2), 203224. 10.3138/jelis-2023-0054
  67. Tur, G., Havemann, L., Marsh, J. D., Keefer, J. M., & Nascimbeni, F. (2020). Becoming an open educator. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2338. 10.25304/rlt.v28.2338
  68. University of Washington. (2022, May 24). What is universal design? Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology. https://www.washington.edu/doit/what-universal-design-0.
  69. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021, August 31). Cost of college tuition has remained stable since September 2019. United States Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2021/cost-of-college-tuition-has-remained-stable-since-september-2019.htm
  70. van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. Academic Press.
  71. Wang, Y. (2023). The research on the impact of distance learning on students’ mental health. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 1252712539. 10.1007/s10639-023-11693-w
  72. Weirick-Johnson, M., & Abumeeiz, S. (2022). The limits of inclusion in open access: Accessible access, universal design, and open educational resources. Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication, 11(1), 121. 10.31274/jlsc.14399
  73. Weller, M., de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, B., & McAndrew, P. (2015). The impact of OER on teaching and learning practice. Open Praxis, 7(4), 351361. 10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.227
  74. Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The access compromise and the 5th R. Improving Learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
  75. Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133146. 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
  76. Wittkower, L. R., & Lo, L. S. (2020). Undergraduate student perspectives on textbook costs and implications for academic success. Open Praxis, 12(1), 115130. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1036
  77. Wolfenden, F., Buckler, A. S. H., & Keraro, F. (2012). OER adaptation and reuse across cultural contexts in Sub Saharan Africa: Lessons from TESSA (Teacher Education in Sub Saharan Africa). Journal of Interactive Media in Education: JiME, 1. 10.5334/2012-03
  78. Wong, B., & Hoskins, K. (2022). Ready, set, work? Career preparations of final-year non-traditional university students. Higher Education Pedagogies, 7(1), 88106. 10.1080/23752696.2022.2100446
  79. Wynants, S. A., & Dennis, J. (2022). Redesigning a research methods course with personalized, interactive OER: A case study of student perceptions and performance. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1), 138153. 10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31706
  80. Zaid, Y., Alabi, A., & Olatise, O. (2024). OER accessibility for students with visual disabilities in higher education in the era of open knowledge. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 42(1). 10.25159/2663-659X/15105
  81. Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Huang, R., Chang, T.-W., Jemni, M., & Kribi, M. K. (2020). Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). 10.1186/s40561-019-0113-2
Language: English
Page range: 730 - 750
Submitted on: Jun 10, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 20, 2025
Published on: Nov 25, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Virginia M. Tucker, Camille A. Charette, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.