Table 1
Comparison between groups.
| GROUP | N | MEAN | S | df | t | p | d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post- test | Artificial intelligence | 26 | 79,1923 | 14,13370 | 50 | –1,428 | 0,160 | 0,396 |
| Teacher | 26 | 74,3846 | 9,75326 |
Table 2
In-group comparison.
| PRE-TEST-POST-TEST | N | S | df | t | p | d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 45,4231 | 13,24590 | 25 | –13,712 | 0,000 | 2,50 |
| Post-test | 26 | 79,1923 | 14,13370 | |||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 42,5000 | 12,32315 | 25 | –12,185 | 0,000 | 2,49 |
| Post- test | 26 | 74,3846 | 9,75326 |
Table 3
Change over time.
| N | MEAN RANK | CHI-SQUARE | df | p | W | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 1,90 | 3,571 | 2 | 0,168 | 0,0686 |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,29 | |||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 1,81 | |||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 1,40 | 39,864 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,7666 |
| Post- test | 26 | 1,60 | |||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 3,00 |
Table 4
Post-test-follow-up test difference.
| N | MEAN RANK | SUM OF RANKS | Z | p | r | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence | Negative Ranks | 18 | 11,03 | 198,50 | –,970 | ,332 | –0.199 |
| Positive Ranks | 7 | 18,07 | 126,50 | ||||
| Ties | 1 | – | – | ||||
| Teacher | Negative Ranks | 0 | ,00 | ,00 | –4,459 | 0,000 | –0.875 |
| Positive Ranks | 26 | 13,50 | 351,00 | ||||
| Ties | 0 | – |
Table 5
Change over time in terms of sub-dimensions.
| N | MEAN RANK | CHI-SQUARE | df | p | W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content creation | Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 1,00 | 43,429 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,835 |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,31 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,69 | ||||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 1,10 | 34,940 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,672 | |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,63 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,27 | ||||||
| Content organisation | Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 1,00 | 42,716 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,821 |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,48 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,52 | ||||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 1,04 | 40,735 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,783 | |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,27 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,69 | ||||||
| Word usage | Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 1,0 | 45,277 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,871 |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,31 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,69 | ||||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 1,15 | 33,250 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,639 | |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,19 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,65 | ||||||
| Grammar | Artificial intelligence | Pre-test | 26 | 1,00 | 43,583 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,838 |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,35 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,65 | ||||||
| Teacher | Pre-test | 26 | 1,08 | 40,696 | 2 | 0,000 | 0,783 | |
| Post- test | 26 | 2,23 | ||||||
| Follow-up test | 26 | 2,69 |
Table 6
Differences in feedback rate.
| TYPE OF FEEDBACK | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | TEACHER | COMPONENTS OF WRITTEN EXPRESSION | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | TEACHER | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | ||
| Router | 81 | 26,82 | 34 | 14,66 | Language/Spelling and Grammar | 54 | 21,52 | 62 | 33,16 |
| Informative | 140 | 46,36 | 126 | 54,31 | Content | 142 | 56,57 | 64 | 34,22 |
| Question | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3.01 | Organisation | 55 | 21,91 | 61 | 32,62 |
| Praise | 63 | 20,86 | 60 | 25,86 | Total | 251 | 100 | 187 | 100 |
| Summariser | 18 | 5,96 | 5 | 2,16 | |||||
| Total | 302 | 100 | 232 | 100 | |||||
| PearsonChi-Square | 25,631 | PearsonChi-Square | 3,225 | ||||||
| p | 0,000 | p | 0,199 | ||||||
| Cramer’s V | 0,219 | Cramer’s V | 0,082 | ||||||
