Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bridging the Gap: ChatGPT’s Role in Enhancing STEM Education Cover

Bridging the Gap: ChatGPT’s Role in Enhancing STEM Education

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022). Teaching, learning and assessing anatomy with artificial intelligence: The road to a better future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14209. 10.3390/ijerph192114209
  2. Abujaber, A. A., Abd-Alrazaq, A., Al-Qudimat, A. R., Nashwan, A. J., & AbuJaber, A. (2023). A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of ChatGPT integration in nursing education: A narrative review. Cureus, 15(11). 10.7759/cureus.48643
  3. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 772. 10.1257/0022051026976
  4. Adıgüzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology. 10.30935/cedtech/13152
  5. Ahmad, K., Qadir, J., Al-Fuqaha, A., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Benhaddou, D., & Ayyash, M. (2020). Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. 10.35542/osf.io/zvu2n
  6. Amin, M. Y. M. (2023). AI and chat GPT in language teaching: Enhancing EFL classroom support and transforming assessment techniques. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(4), 115. 10.33422/ijhep.v4i4.554
  7. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
  8. Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The impact of the use of STEM education approach on the blended learning to improve student’s critical thinking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 2432. 10.13189/ujer.2020.081503
  9. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 330. 10.1257/jep.29.3.3
  10. Babu, C. S., & Akshara, P. M. (2024). Revolutionizing conversational AI: unleashing the power of ChatGPT-Based applications in generative AI and natural language processing. In Advanced Applications of Generative AI and Natural Language Processing Models (pp. 228248). IGI Global. 10.4018/979-8-3693-0502-7.ch011
  11. Baharin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810821. 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4421
  12. Baradel, C. (2023). Interaction, Design, and Assessment: An Exploratory Study on ChatGPT in Language Education. http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/25711
  13. Baskara, F. R. (2023). AI-Driven dynamics: ChatGPT transforming ELT teacher-student interactions. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 13(2), 261275. 10.26714/lensa.13.2.2023.261-275
  14. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
  15. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
  16. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  17. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., Toquero, C. M., Singh, L, Tlili, A., Lee, K., Nichols, M., Ossiannilsson, E., Brown, M., Irvine, V., Raffaghelli, J. E., Santos-Hermosa, G., Farrell, O., Adam, T., Thong, Y. L., Sani-Bozkurt, S., Sharma, R. C., Hrastinski, S., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53130. 10.5281/zenodo.7636568
  18. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 18771901. 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.90
  19. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Brynjolfsson and McAfee.
  20. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
  21. Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219243. 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
  22. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. 10.4324/9780203771587
  23. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. Handbook of mixed methods research designs, 2136. 10.4135/9781529614572.n6
  24. Dai, Y., & Arnberg, B. (2022). “We have to survive, first”: Speculative ethnographies of Chinese student experience during COVID-19. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(1), 5365. 10.1177/15327086211050041
  25. Dai, Y., Lin, X., & Li, L. (2021). Technology acceptance of LMS—do previous online learning experiences matter?. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 14(2), 7590. 10.18785/jetde.1402.04
  26. Dai, Y., Lin, X., Su, S., & Li, L. (2022). The Online Learning Academic Achievement of Chinese Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Entitlement. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 116127. 10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.384
  27. Dai, Y., Luan, L., & Lin, X. (2023). The effects of online learning readiness on self-regulated learning for the first-time online learning students. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 4262. 10.5281/zenodo.8194076
  28. Dinçer, R., Dinçer, N., & Guksu, O. (2023). An interactive conversation with a chatbot: Does ChatGPT know standard phraseology in aviation English? The Literacy Trek, 9(2), 2441. 10.47216/literacytrek.1382543
  29. D‘Mello, S., Dieterle, E., & Duckworth, A. (2017). Advanced, analytic, automated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 104123. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1281747
  30. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  31. Fay, M. P., & Proschan, M. A. (2010). Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Statistics Surveys, 4, 1. 10.1214/09-ss051
  32. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2024). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Ghandour, A., Woodford, B. J., & Abusaimeh, H. (2024). Ethical considerations in the use of ChatGPT: An exploration through the lens of five moral dimensions. IEEE Access. 10.1109/access.2024.3394243
  34. Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., … & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 1923. 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
  35. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A. T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: a literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. 10.3390/educsci13121216
  36. Graesser, A. C., Li, H., & Forsyth, C. (2014). Learning by communicating in natural language with conversational agents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 374380. 10.1177/0963721414540680
  37. Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. 10.3390/educsci13070692
  38. Guo, S., & Wang, Y. (2024). Investigating predictors of juvenile traditional and/or cyber offense using machine learning by constructing a decision support system. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 108079. 10.1016/j.chb.2023.108079
  39. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81112. 10.3102/003465430298487
  40. Hirschberg, J., & Manning, C. D. (2015). Advances in natural language processing. Science, 349(6245), 261266. 10.1126/science.aaa8685
  41. Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156177. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  42. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
  43. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications for industry 4.0: A literature-based study. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 7(01), 83111. 10.1142/s2424862221300040
  44. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365379. 10.3102/0013189X09339057
  45. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112133. 10.1177/1558689806298224
  46. Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and analysis of chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4402499
  47. Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. 10.3390/su151612451
  48. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 704. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704
  49. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  50. Kaswan, K. S., Dhatterwal, J. S., & Ojha, R. P. (2024). AI in personalized learning. In Advances in Technological Innovations in Higher Education (pp. 103117). CRC Press. 10.1201/9781003376699-9
  51. Kerfoot, B. P., Fu, Y., Baker, H., Connelly, D., Ritchey, M. L., & Genega, E. M. (2010). Online spaced education generates transfer and improves long-term retention of diagnostic skills: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 211(3), 331337. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.023
  52. Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. Language Education and Technology, 3(1). https://langedutech.com/letjournal/index.php/let/article/view/48
  53. Lei, Q., Mason, R. A., Xin, Y. P., Davis, J. L., David, M., & Lory, C. (2020a). A meta–analysis of single–case research on mathematics word problem–solving interventions for English learners with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(4), 201217. 10.1111/ldrp.12233
  54. Lei, Q., & Xin, Y. P. (2023). A synthesis of mathematical word problem-solving instructions for English learners with learning disabilities in mathematics. Review of Education, 11(2), e3396. 10.1002/rev3.3396
  55. Lei, Q., Xin, Y. P., Morita-Mullaney, T., & Tzur, R. (2020b). Instructional scaffolds in mathematics instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: An exploratory case study. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 123144. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1264271
  56. Lin, X. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning among adult learners. Adult Learning, 10451595231184928. 10.1177/10451595231184928
  57. Lin, X., Luterbach, K., Gregory, K. H., & Sconyers, S. E. (2024). A case study Investigating the utilization of ChatGPT in online discussions. Online Learning, 28(2), 123. 10.24059/olj.v28i2.4407
  58. Lin, X., & Dai, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of the effect of online learning readiness on self-regulated learning. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(2). 10.1177/2212585X221111938
  59. Lin, X., Dai, Y., & Shi, H. (2022). Comparing the Sense of Online Classroom Community between Students from Urban and Rural Areas at a Chinese University. Journal of Educators Online, 19(3), n3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1363837
  60. Liu, M., Ren, Y., Nyagoga, L. M., Stonier, F., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2023). Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools. Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 72101. 10.1002/fer3.10
  61. Liyanage, M. L. A. P., Hirimuthugoda, U. J., Liyanage, N. L. T. N., Thammita, D. H. M. M. P., Wedanage, D. K. H. W., Kugathasan, A., & Thelijjagoda, S. (2022, October). AI solution to assist online education productivity via personalizing learning strategies and analyzing the student performance. In 2022 IEEE 13th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (pp. 06090615). IEEE. 10.1109/uemcon54665.2022.9965735
  62. Luan, L. (2016). Finding a basic interpretive unit through the human visual perception and cognition-A comparison between filmmakers and audiences. Bowling Green State University. https://philpapers.org/rec/LUAFAB
  63. Luan, L. (2021). How readers process narrative information involving characters’ decisions. Bowling Green State University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2627176621?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
  64. Luan, L., Huang, X., Zhu, S., Jiang, L., Chen, W., & Ostadabbas, S. (2023). An exploratory examination of online learning during and after the pandemic: Learning goal congruence in lecturing and research activities. In Rethinking Hybrid and Remote Work in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, Policies, and Practices after COVID-19 (pp.7399). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-031-36632-1_5
  65. Luan, l., Lin, X., Dai, Y., Hu, S., & Sun, Q. (2024). Exploring the cognitive dynamics of artificial intelligence in the post-COVID-19 and learning 3.0 era: A case study of ChatGPT. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 110. 10.5281/zenodo.10990472
  66. Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., … & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541546. 10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316
  67. Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: what to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 3750. 10.1109/msp.2021.3055032
  68. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5060. 10.1214/aoms/1177730491
  69. Martin, S. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence, mixed reality, and the redefinition of the classroom. Rowman & Littlefield.
  70. Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. 10.3390/educsci13090856
  71. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2024). Instructors as Innovators: a Future-focused Approach to New AI Learning Opportunities, With Prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4802463
  72. Naseer, F., Khalid, M. U., Ayub, N., Rasool, A., Abbas, T., & Afzal, M. W. (2024). Automated assessment and feedback in higher education using generative AI. In Transforming Education With Generative AI: Prompt Engineering and Synthetic Content Creation (pp. 433461). IGI Global. 10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch021
  73. Nazir, A., & Wang, Z. (2023). A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges. Meta-Radiology, 100022. 10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100022
  74. Nepal, T. K. (2024). Exploring the applications and challenges of chatGPT in research and academia: A comprehensive review. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(05), 10431050. 10.58812/wsis.v2i05.729
  75. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199218. 10.1080/03075070600572090
  76. Nielsen, F. Å. (2011) A New ANEW: Evaluation of a Word List for Sentiment Analysis in Microblogs. Proceedings of the ESWC2011 Workshop on “Making Sense of Microposts”: Big Things Come in Small Packages, Vol. 718, 9398. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3126488
  77. Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical practices with the assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103111. 10.47852/bonviewijce42022489
  78. Oleson, A., Hora, M., & Benbow, R. (2014). STEM: How a poorly defined acronym is shaping education and workforce development policy in the United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556481
  79. Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.
  80. Rane, N. (2023). Enhancing mathematical capabilities through ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence: Roles and challenges in solving mathematical problems. Available at SSRN 4603237. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4603237
  81. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., … & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
  82. Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
  83. Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249255. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  84. Sevnarayan, K., & Potter, M. A. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in distance education: Transformations, challenges, and impact on academic integrity and student voice. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1). 10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.41
  85. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 4369. 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
  86. Stein, B., Haynes, A., Redding, M., Ennis, T., & Cecil, M. (2007). Assessing critical thinking in STEM and beyond. In Innovations in E-Learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education (pp. 7982). Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_14
  87. STEM Education for the Future. (2020, May). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/edu/Materials/STEM%20Education%20for%20the%20Future%20-%202020%20Visioning%20Report.pdf
  88. Syahputra, M. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT in language education: Friend or Foe for teachers? In International Conference on Education, Science, Technology and Health (ICONESTH) (pp. 12521269). https://eproceeding.bbg.ac.id/iconesth/article/view/221
  89. Tekin, C., Braun, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2015, April). eTutor: Online learning for personalized education. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 55455549). IEEE. 10.1109/icassp.2015.7179032
  90. Terry, W. S. (2017). Learning and memory: Basic principles, processes, and procedures. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315622781
  91. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  92. Vahidy, J. (2019). Enhancing STEM learning through technology. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2019. https://pressbooks.pub/techandcurr2019/chapter/enhancingstem/
  93. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197221. 10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
  94. Vashishth, T. K., Sharma, V., Sharma, K. K., Kumar, B., Panwar, R., & Chaudhary, S. (2024). AI-Driven Learning Analytics for Personalized Feedback and Assessment in Higher Education. In Using Traditional Design Methods to Enhance AI-Driven Decision Making (pp. 206230). IGI Global. 10.4018/979-8-3693-0639-0.ch009
  95. Waghmare, C. (2023). Security and ethical considerations when using ChatGPT. In Unleashing The Power of ChatGPT: A Real World Business Applications (pp. 111132). Berkeley, CA: Apress. 10.1007/979-8-8688-0032-0_6
  96. Wang, Y., Tarakci, H., & Prybutok, V. (2023). Model comparison of regression, neural networks, and XGBoost as applied to the English Premier League transfer market. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 23(6), 543559. 10.1504/ijsmm.2023.133786
  97. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons. 10.2307/3211318
  98. Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 11221136. 10.1109/jas.2023.123618
  99. Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175187. 10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884
  100. Yesilyurt, Y. E. (2023). AI-Enabled Assessment and Feedback Mechanisms for Language Learning: Transforming Pedagogy and Learner Experience. In Transforming the Language Teaching Experience in the Age of AI (pp. 2543). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-6684-9893-4.ch002
  101. Zhong, L. (2023). A systematic review of personalized learning in higher education: learning content structure, learning materials sequence, and learning readiness support. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 70537073. 10.1080/10494820.2022.2061006
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 128
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2024
Published on: Apr 15, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Lingfei Luan, Xi Lin, Yan Dai, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.