Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Open Education and Faculty Gender in Shaping Student Perceptions Cover

The Role of Open Education and Faculty Gender in Shaping Student Perceptions

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351371. 10.1177/1094428114547952
  2. Anderson, K. J. (2010). Students’ stereotypes of professors: An exploration of the double violations of ethnicity and gender. Social Psychology of Education, 13(4), 459472. 10.1007/s11218-010-9121-3
  3. Angelopoulou, A., Hodhod, R., & Perez, A. J. (2022). Factors affecting student educational choices regarding OER material in Computer Science. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(4), 755781. 10.1007/s40692-022-00219-x
  4. Baran, E., & Al Zoubi, D. (2020). Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education, 41(2), 230244. 10.1080/01587919.2020.1757409
  5. Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. S. Eccles & K. Salmelo-Aro (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edition: Motivational psychology. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26099-6
  6. Belliveau, J., & Yakovenko, I. (2022). Evaluating and improving the quality of survey data from panel and crowd-sourced samples: A practical guide for psychological research. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 30(4), 400408. 10.1037/pha0000564
  7. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 152157. 10.1257/000282805774670149
  8. Biddle, A. M., & Clinton-Lisell, V. (2023). ‘The pictures allowed me to connect to the material more’: Student perceptions of a diversity-focused open pedagogy assignment. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 9(4), 405418. 10.1037/stl0000385
  9. Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1019. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019
  10. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  11. Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap *. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 11011144. 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
  12. Chávez, K., & Mitchell, K. M. W. (2020). Exploring bias in student evaluations: Gender, race, and ethnicity. PS: Political Science and Politics, 53(2), 270274. 10.1017/S1049096519001744
  13. Chen, D., & Hendricks, C. (2023). Open pedagogy benefits and challenges: Student perceptions of writing open case studies. Open Praxis, 15(1), 2736. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518
  14. Clinton, V. (2018). Savings without sacrifices: A case study of open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: the Journal of Distance and Open Learning, 33(3), 177189. 10.1080/02680513.2018.1486184
  15. Clinton, V., Legerski, E., & Rhodes, B. (2019). Comparing student learning from and perceptions of open and commercial textbook excerpt: A randomized experiment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 112, Art. 110. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00110
  16. Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Open pedagogy: A systematic review of empirical findings. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 255268. 10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.511
  17. Clinton-Lisell, V., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). Understanding student experiences of renewable and traditional assignments. College Teaching, 71(2), 125134. 10.1080/87567555.2023.2179591
  18. Clinton-Lisell, V., & Kelly, A. E. (2024, July 25). Student perceptions of faculty and course characteristics. Retrieved from osf.io/74amg
  19. Clinton-Lisell, V. E., Roberts-Crews, J., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). SCOPE of open education: A new framework for research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 135153. 10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7356
  20. Coleman-Prisco, V. (2017). Factors influencing faculty innovation and adoption of open educational resources in United States higher education. International Journal of Education and Human Developments, 3(4), 112.
  21. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 12411299. 10.2307/1229039
  22. Creswell, J. W. (2004). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
  23. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., Bond, M. H., Croizet, J. C., Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., & Htun, T. T., maio, HJ, G., Perry, J., Petkova, K., Todorov, V., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Morales, E., Moya, M., Palacios, M., … Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 133. 10.1348/014466608X314935
  24. Cuttler, C. (2019). Students’ use and perceptions of the relevance and quality of open textbooks compared to traditional textbooks in online and traditional classroom environments. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 6583. 10.1177/1475725718811300
  25. Decuypere, M. (2019). Open Education platforms: Theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner. European Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 439460. 10.1177/1474904118814141
  26. DeRosa, R., & Robinson, S. (2017). ‘From OER to Open Pedagogy: Harnessing the Power of Open.’ open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science, R. S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), (pp. 115124). Ubiquity Press. 10.5334/bbc.i
  27. Docka-Filipek, D., Draper, C., Snow, J., & Stone, L. B. (2023). ‘Professor moms’ and “hidden service” in pandemic times: Students report women faculty more supportive and accommodating amid U.S. COVID crisis onset. Innovative Higher Education, 48, 125. 10.1007/s10755-023-09652-x
  28. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
  29. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues’ situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 129. 10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9
  30. Eckerd, S., DuHadway, S., Bendoly, E., Carter, C. R., & Kaufmann, L. (2021). On making experimental design choices: Discussions on the use and challenges of demand effects, incentives, deception, samples, and vignettes. Journal of Operations Management, 67(2), 261275. 10.1002/joom.1128
  31. Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47(3/4), 99114. 10.1023/A:1021020920715
  32. Eifler, S., & Petzold, K. (2019). Validity aspects of vignette experiments: Expected “what-if” differences between reports of behavioral intentions and actual behavior. In Experimental methods in survey research (pp. 393416). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781119083771.ch20
  33. Finlayson, C. (2020). Opening World Regional Geography: A Case Study. Open Praxis, 12, Article 2. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1087
  34. Finley, S. C., Gray, B. M., & Martin, L. L. (2018). Affirming our values: African American scholars, white virtual mobs, and the complicity of white university administrators. Journal of Academic Freedom, 9, 120. https://www.aaup.org/JAF9/%E2%80%9Caffirming-our-values%E2%80%9D-african-american-scholars-white-virtual-mobs-and-complicity-white#.ZG1dWuzMJ6o
  35. Fischer, L., Belikov, O., Ikahihifo, T. K., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Martin, M. T. (2020). Academic librarians examination of university students’ and faculty’s perceptions of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 12(3), 399415. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1081
  36. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878902. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  37. Fleck, B., & Richmond, A. S. (2024). Does the instructors gender identity and syllabus design affect students perceptions of their instructor? Teaching of Psychology, 51(2), 166179. 10.1177/00986283211072742
  38. Green, C. (2017). Open licensing and open education licensing policy. In R. S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 2941). Ubiquity Press. 10.5334/bbc.c
  39. Greszki, R., Meyer, M., & Schoen, H. (2015). Exploring the effects of removing “too fast” responses and respondents from web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(2), 471503. 10.1093/poq/nfu058
  40. Grissett, J. O., & Huffman, C. (2019). An Open versus Traditional Psychology Textbook: Student Performance, Perceptions, and Use. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 2135. 10.1177/1475725718810181
  41. Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745765. 10.1037/pspp0000075
  42. Harrits, G. S., & Møller, M. Ø. (2021). Qualitative vignette experiments: A mixed methods design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 526545. 10.1177/1558689820977607
  43. Heffernan, T. (2022). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 144154. 10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
  44. Hilton, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853876. 10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
  45. Howard, V. J., & Whitmore, C. B. (2020, August). Evaluating student perceptions of open and commercial psychology textbooks. Frontiers in Education, 5. 10.3389/feduc.2020.00139
  46. Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 14101412. 10.1126/science.1177067
  47. Jhangiani, R. S., Dastur, F. N., Le Grand, R., & Penner, K. (2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), n1. 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5
  48. Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 536546. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
  49. Kaerwer, K., & Pritchett, M. (2023). Critical race theory in education: How banning its tenets undermines our best hope for equity in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 32(1), 300313. 10.1007/s42822-023-00130-9
  50. Katz, S. (2019). Student textbook purchasing: The hidden cost of time. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 7(1), 1218. https://jpaap.ac.uk/JPAAP/article/view/349
  51. Kedley, K. E. (2021). Gender binary. In Encyclopedia of queer studies in education (pp. 179180). Brill. 10.1163/9789004506725_037
  52. Kersey, S. (2019). Student perceptions on teaching and learning using open educational resources in college calculus. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 38(3), 249265.
  53. Kotzian, P., Stoeber, T., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. E. (2020). To be or not to be in the sample? On using manipulation checks in experimental accounting research. Accounting Research Journal, 33(3), 469482. 10.1108/ARJ-06-2019-0128
  54. Kouzoukas, G. (2019). Engaging first generation students. In S. J. Quaye, S. R. Harper, & S. L. Pendakur (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 287306). Routledge.
  55. Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2022). Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(1), 7384. 10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w
  56. Krishnan, P. (2024). A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 3740. 10.7748/nr.2018.e1582
  57. Lantrip, J., & Ray, J. (2021). Faculty perceptions and usage of OER at Oregon community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(12), 896910. 10.1080/10668926.2020.1838967
  58. Lazzara, J. M. (2023). A comparative study of approaches to instruction based on course material type [Ph.D., Grand Canyon University]. Proquest Dissertations and Theses (2864733237). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Publicly Available Content Database. https://ezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/comparative-study-approaches-instruction-based-on/docview/2864733237/se-2?accountid=28267
  59. Lin, H. (2019). Teaching and learning without a textbook. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4224
  60. Magro, J., & Tabaei, S. V. (2020). Results from a Psychology OER pilot program: Faculty and student perceptions, cost savings, and academic outcomes. Open Praxis, 12(1), 8399. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1007
  61. McKenney, E. A., Gates, T. A., Goller, C. C., Tully, D., Leggett, Z., Lupek, M., Cross, W., & Krieg, C. (2024). Strategies to empower students through open pedagogy and citizen science. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 5(1). 10.18278/ijoer.5.1.5
  62. Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2011). Contrast effects of stereotypes: “Nurturing” male professors are evaluated more positively than “nurturing” female professors. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(1), 5764. 10.3149/jms.1901.57
  63. Mullens, A. M., & Hoffman, B. (2023). The affordability solution: A systematic review of open educational resources. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 72. 10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7
  64. Nusbaum, A. T., & Cuttler, C. (2020). Hidden impacts of OER: Effects of OER on instructor ratings and course selection. Frontiers in Education, 5, art. 72. 10.3389/feduc.2020.00072
  65. Pickering, M. (2015). Stereotyping and stereotypes. In J. Stone, R. M. Dennis & P. S. Rizova, A. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell enclyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and nationalism, vol 5, (pp. 12). 10.1002/9781118663202.wberen046
  66. Priniski, S. J., Rosenzweig, E. Q., Canning, E. A., Hecht, C. A., Tibbetts, Y., Hyde, J. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2019). The benefits of combining value for the self and others in utility-value interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 14781497. 10.1037/edu0000343
  67. Renström, E. A., Gustafsson Sendén, M., & Lindqvist, A. (2021). Gender stereotypes in student evaluations of teaching. Frontiers in Education, 5, 571287. 10.3389/feduc.2020.571287
  68. Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2022). Beyond utility value interventions: The. why, when, and how for next steps in expectancy-value intervention research. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 1130. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1984242
  69. Sanchez, S., Carter, D. E., Morey, T., & Fedorek, B. (2022). Student perceptions of an open educational resource for an introduction to criminal Justice Course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 33(3), 426441. 10.1080/10511253.2021.1986084
  70. Schultz, T., & Azadbakht, E. S. (2023). Exploring open pedagogy in a librarian-taught honors course. Communications in Information Literacy, 17(1), 221237. 10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.1.2
  71. Sheringham, J., Kuhn, I., & Burt, J. (2021). The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review. BMC medical research methodology, 21(1), 81. 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4
  72. Sheu, F.-R., & Grissett, J. (2020). Quality and Cost Matter: Students’ Perceptions of Open versus Non-Open Texts through a Single-Blind Review. Open Praxis, 12(1), Article 1. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1012
  73. Short, C. R., Hilton, B., Hilton, J. III., Wiley, D., Chaffee, R., Guilmett, J., & Darrow, J. (2024). Higher education instructors’ perceptions of open pedagogy: An exploratory study of open pedagogy definitions in practice. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 116. 10.1080/02680513.2024.2334237
  74. Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51(11–12), 687696. 10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
  75. Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 13291342. 10.1177/0146167200263002
  76. Solanki, S. M., & Xu, D. (2018). Looking beyond academic performance: The influence of instructor gender on student motivation in STEM Fields. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 801835. 10.3102/0002831218759034
  77. SPARC. (2024). Open Education. https://sparcopen.org/open-education/
  78. Sprague, J., & Massoni, K. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53(11–12), 779793. 10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
  79. Tang, H., Yang, Y., & Bao, Y. (2023). Understanding college students’ achievement goals toward using open educational resources from the perspective of expectancy–value theory. Distance Education, 44(4), 675693. 10.1080/01587919.2023.2267464
  80. Tillinghast, B., Fialkowski, M. K., & Draper, J. (2020). Exploring aspects of open educational resources through OER-enabled pedagogy. Frontiers in Education, 5. 10.3389/feduc.2020.00076
  81. Trust, T., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2023). College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 353371. 10.1177/14697874221081454
  82. Turner, T. L., Balmer, D. F., & Coverdale, J. H. (2013). Methodologies and study designs relevant to medical education research: International Review of Psychiatry. International Review of Psychiatry, 25(3), 301310. 10.3109/09540261.2013.790310
  83. Velez, J. J., Sorenson, T., McKim, A., & Cano, J. (2013). Self-efficacy and task value motivation of students based on classroom, instructor and student variables. NACTA Journal, 57(4), 6571. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/nactajournal.57.4.65
  84. Vojtech, G., & Grissett, J. (2017). Student perceptions of college faculty who use OER. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155171. 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3032
  85. Wang, G., & Williamson, A. (2022). Course evaluation scores: Valid measures for teaching effectiveness or rewards for lenient grading? Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 297318. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1722992
  86. Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Exploring student perceptions as co-authors of course material. Open Praxis, 13(1), 5367. 10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1187
  87. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 6881. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  88. Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L III.. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
  89. Williams, C. (2022). Student perceptions of open pedagogy and community-engaged service. In D. Ortega-Sánchez (Ed.) Active learning – research and practice for STEAMand Social Sciences Education. InTech. 10.5772/intechopen.107099
  90. Witt, A. (2020). Towards a working definition of open pedagogy. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(2). 10.18278/ijoer.3.2.5
  91. Wynants, S. A., & Dennis, J. (2022). Redesigning a research methods course with personalized, interactive OER: A case study of student perceptions and performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1), 138153. 10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31706
  92. Zulaiha, D., & Triana, Y. (2023). Students’ perception toward the use of open educational resources to improve writing skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 174196. 10.24815/siele.v10i1.25797
Language: English
Page range: 567 - 582
Submitted on: Jul 30, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 26, 2024
Published on: Nov 29, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Virginia Clinton-Lisell, Alison Kelly, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.