Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perceived Impact of a Teacher Development MOOC on Self-Determined IEP Implementation Cover

Perceived Impact of a Teacher Development MOOC on Self-Determined IEP Implementation

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129147. 10.1080/08856250210129056
  2. Basma, B., & Savage, R. (2018). Teacher professional development and student literacy growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 457481. 10.1007/s10648-017-9416-4
  3. Blanchard, C., Pelletier, L., Otis, N., & Sharp, E. (2004). Rôle de l’autodétermination et des aptitudes scolaires dans la prédiction des absences scolaires et l’intention de décrocher [Role of self-determination and academic aptitudes as a predictor of student absenteeism and dropout]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(1), 105123. 10.7202/011772ar
  4. Bonafini, F. C. (2017). The effects of participants’ engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC for teachers’ professional development. Open Praxis, 9(4), 433447. 10.5944/openpraxis.9.4.637
  5. Boulay, M.-F. (2021). Enquête descriptive sur les activités de développement professionnel des enseignantes et des enseignants des écoles primaires publiques francophones et anglophones du Québec [Descriptive enquiry into teacher professional development in Quebec public Francophone and Anglophone primary schools]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Université Laval. https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11794/68350/1/36957.pdf
  6. Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1988). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. Training & Development Journal, 42(2), 6669.
  7. Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599607. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.006
  8. Coldwell, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189198. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.015
  9. Coldwell, M. (2019). Reconsidering context: Six underlying features of context to improve learning from evaluation. Evaluation, 25(1), 99117. 10.1177/1356389018803234
  10. Coldwell, M., & Simkins, T. (2011). Level models of continuing professional development evaluation: A grounded review and critique. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 143157. 10.1080/19415257.2010.495497
  11. Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Buckler, N., Coles-Jordan, D., Crisp, B., Saunders, L., & Coe, R. (2015). Developing great teaching: Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development. Teacher Development Trust. https://dro.dur.ac.uk/15834/1/15834.pdf
  12. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf. 10.54300/122.311
  13. De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218231. 10.1111/jcal.12130
  14. Desimone, L., & Garet, M. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 252263. 10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
  15. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181199. 10.3102/0013189X08331140
  16. Didion, L., Toste, J. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: A meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 2966. 10.1080/19345747.2019.1670884
  17. Drysdale, M. T., Williams, A., & Meaney, G. J. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating students with behaviour disorders: Challenges and strategies. Exceptionality Education International, 17(3), 3560. 10.5206/eei.v17i3.7609
  18. Duchaine, M.-P., & Gaudreau, N. (2021). Soutenir la réussite des élèves présentant un TDAH: Effets perçus d’un MOOC pour le personnel enseignant [Fostering successful outcomes for ADHD students: The perceived impact of a MOOC on teaching staff]. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 18(2), 2444. 10.18162/ritpu-2021-v18n2-02
  19. Duchaine, M.-P., & Gaudreau, N. (2023). Conditions d’efficacité et facteurs d’influence du développement professionnel du personnel enseignant: Une recension des écrits [Conditions for effectiveness and influencing factors in teacher professional development: A literature review]. Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheurs en éducation (RCJCE), 14(2), 140149.
  20. Duchaine, M.-P., Gaudreau, N., & Frenette, É. (2024). Perceptions d’enseignants du potentiel d’un MOOC pour soutenir leur développement professionnel continu [Teachers’ perceptions regarding a MOOCs potential to foster their continuing professional development]. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur (RIPES), 40(1), 124. 10.4000/ripes.5558
  21. Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., & Hamby, D. W. (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(12), 17311744. 10.5897/ERR2015.2306
  22. Ernst, C., & Rogers, M. R. (2009). Development of the inclusion attitude scale for high school teachers. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(3), 305322. 10.1080/15377900802487235
  23. Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). A Practical Guide for Teaching Self-Determination. Council of Exceptional Children.
  24. Fletcher-Wood, H., & Zuccollo, J. (2020). The effects of high-quality professional development on teachers and students: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Education Policy Institute. https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/effects-high-quality-professional-development/
  25. Fortin, M.-F., & Gagnon, J. (2022). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche: Méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives [Foundations and steps in the research process: Quantitative and qualitative methods] (4th edition). Chenelière Éducation.
  26. Garvis, S., Twigg, D., & Pendergast, D. (2011). Breaking the negative cycle: The formation of self-efficacy beliefs in the arts. A focus on professional experience in pre-service teacher education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 3641. 10.1177/183693911103600206
  27. Gaudreau, N. (2013). Soutenir la mise en œuvre de nouvelles pratiques éducatives par l’accompagnement des enseignants et le développement de leur sentiment d’efficacité personnelle [Encouraging the adoption of new practices in education contexts by employing teacher support methods and self-efficacy development strategies]. In M. Doucet & J. Pharand (Eds.), Accompagnement, enseignement et apprentissage: Quand les émotions s’en mêlent [Coaching, teaching and learning: When feelings are part of the equation] (pp. 174197). Presses de l’Université du Québec. 10.2307/j.ctv18pgr6w.13
  28. Gaudreau, N., Trépanier, N., & Duchaine, M.-P. (2021). Les types d’activités de formation continue, leurs avantages et leurs limites [Benefits and drawbacks of the various contining education formats]. In N. Gaudreau, N. Trépanier & S. Daigle (Eds.), Le développement professionnel en milieu éducatif: Des pratiques favorisant la réussite et le bien-être [Professional development in the education field: Practices that foster occupational success and wellness] (pp. 136165). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
  29. Gracheva, L. Y., Bagramyan, E., Tsygankova, M., Dugarova, T. T., & Sheveleva, N. (2020). Teacher professional development models and practices in foreign educational systems. The Education and Science Journal, 22(6), 176200. 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-176-200
  30. Guerci, M., Bartezzaghi, E., & Solari, L. (2010). Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: A stakeholder-based analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(4), 291308. 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00359.x
  31. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin.
  32. Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan Magazine, 84(10), 748750. 10.1177/003172170308401007
  33. Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495500. 10.1177/003172170909000709
  34. Karsenti, T., & Bugmann, J. (2016). Soutenir la motivation des participants aux MOOC: Quels rôles pour la ludification, la mobilité et l’aspect social? [Fostering motivation in MOOC attendees: What role does gamification, mobilization, and socialization play?] Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 13(2–3), 133149. 10.18162/ritpu-2016-v13n23-09
  35. Kazdin, A. E., Siegel, T. C., & Bass, D. (1992). Cognitive problem-solving skills training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 733747. 10.1037/0022-006X.60.5.733
  36. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 33(6), 7892.
  37. Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Association for Talent Development.
  38. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547588. 10.3102/0034654318759268
  39. Kumar, P., & Kumar, N. (2020). A study of learner’s satisfaction from MOOCs through a mediation model. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 354363. 10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.041
  40. Laguardia, G. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Buts personnels, besoins psychologiques fondamentaux et bien- être: Théorie de l’autodétermination et applications [Personal goal-setting, fundamental psychological needs and wellbeing: Self-determination theory and its applications]. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 21(2), 281304.
  41. Lamarche, M.-A., & Durand, M.-J. (2022). Développement du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle perçu par des enseignantes œuvrant auprès d’élèves ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme au secondaire et appropriation de nouvelles pratiques évaluatives [Developing a perceived sense of self-efficacy in teachers working with Autism spectrum disorders in secondary schools and the adoption of new assessment practices]. Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation, 45(3), 835866. 10.53967/cje-rce.v45i3.5239
  42. Lee, S. W. (2018). Pulling back the curtain: Revealing the cumulative importance of high-performing, highly qualified teachers on students’ educational outcome. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 359381. 10.3102/0162373718769379
  43. Leko, M. M., Kiely, M. T., Brownell, M. T., Osipova, A., Dingle, M. P. et Mundy, C. A. (2015). Understanding special educators’ learning opportunities in collaborative groups: The role of discourse. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(2), 138157. 10.1177/0888406414557283
  44. Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019). Strengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 260293. 10.3102/0162373719849044
  45. Mahat, M. (2008). The development of a psychometrically-sound instrument to measure teachers’ multidimensional attitudes toward inclusive education. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 8292. http://www.internationalsped.com/documents/9%20Mahat.doc
  46. Massé, L., Lanaris, C., & Boudreault, F. (2005). Programme d’intervention multidimensionnelle à l’intention d’élèves TDAH intégrés dans leur classe ordinaire [Multidimensional intervention program for ADHD student in inclusive classrooms] (Research study submitted to the Special Needs Department). https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/docs/GSC644/F671815677_Mass__TDAH_bilan_2002_2005.pdf
  47. Massé, L., Nadeau, M.-F., Verret, C., Gaudreau, N., & Lagacé-Leblanc, J. (2020). Facteurs influençant les attitudes des enseignant·e·s québécois·es envers l’intégration des élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales [Factors that influence Quebec teacher attitudes towards inclusive education for behaviourally challenged children]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 46(1), 4164. 10.7202/1070726ar
  48. Massé, L., Verret, C., Gaudreau, N., & Nadeau, M. F. (2018). Portrait des pratiques éducatives utilisées pour les élèves présentant des troubles du comportement et conditions de mise en place [Depiction of teaching practices used with children presenting with behavioural disorders and related implementation conditions]. Quebec Government FRQ Report under the Research Program for Student Retention and School Success (2014-RP-179132). https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/histoire-et-rapport/portrait-des-pratiques-educatives-utilisees-pour-les-eleves-presentant-des-troubles-du-comportement-et-conditions-de-mise-en-place/
  49. Misra, P. K. (2018). MOOCs for teacher professional development: Reflections and suggested actions. Open Praxis, 10(1), 6777. 10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.780
  50. Omare, E. (2021). Teacher qualification, experience, capability beliefs and professional development: Do they predict teacher adoption of 21st century pedagogies? International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 11611192.
  51. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. G. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376407. 10.3102/0034654311413609
  52. O’Toole, S. (2009). Kirkpatrick on evaluation: Not crazy after all these years. Training and Development in Australia, 36(4), 23.
  53. Ross-Hill, R. (2009). Teacher attitude towards inclusion practices and special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9(3), 188198. 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01135.x
  54. Roy, N., Poellhuber, B., Garand, P.-O., & Beauchamp-Goyette, F. (2016). Analyse de qualité d’un MOOC: Le point de vue des étudiants [A MOOC quality review: Attendee perspectives]. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 13(2–3), 150165. 10.18162/ritpu-2016-v13n3-03
  55. Saadati, F., Chandia, E., Cerda, G., & Felmer, P. (2023). Self-efficacy, practices, and their relationships; the impact of a professional development program for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(1), 103124. 10.1007/s10857-021-09523-2
  56. Schomaker, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). Predicting the unknown: Novelty processing depends on expectations. Brain Research, 1694, 140148. 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.05.008
  57. Scott, L. A., Taylor, J. P., Bruno, L., Padhye, I., Brendli, K., Wallace, W., & Cormier, C. J. (2021). Why do they stay? Factors associated with special education reachers’ persistence. Remedial and Special Education, 43(2), 7586. 10.1177/07419325211014965
  58. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2021). What are the characteristics of effective teacher professional development? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/evidence-reviews/teacher-professional-development-characteristics
  59. Singh, M. (2013). Training evaluation: Various approaches and applications. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 7(1), 2734.
  60. Smet, M. (2021). Professional development and teacher job satisfaction: Evidence from a multilevel model. Mathematics, 10(51), 51. 10.3390/math10010051
  61. Tanveer, S., Iqbal, Z., & Arsalan, M. (2021). Impact of professional development of teachers on students’ achievement. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (Sjesr), 4(4), 4249. 10.36902/sjesr-vol4-iss4-2021(42-49)
  62. Taranto, E., Jablonski, S., Recio, T., Mercat, C., Cunha, E., Lázaro, C., Ludwig, M., & Mammana, M. F. (2021). Professional development in mathematics education—Evaluation of a MOOC on outdoor mathematics. Mathematics, 9(22), 2975. 10.3390/math9222975
  63. Taranto, E., Robutti, O., & Arzarello, F. (2020). Learning within MOOCs for mathematics teacher education. ZDM, 52(7), 14391453. 10.1007/s11858-020-01178-2
  64. Thorlund, K., & Mills, E. J. (2012). Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 1, 113. 10.1186/2046-4053-1-41
  65. Tømte, C. E. (2019). MOOCs in teacher education: Institutional and pedagogical change? European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 6581. 10.1080/02619768.2018.1529752
  66. Tooley, M., & Connally, K. (2016). No panacea: Diagnosing what ails teacher professional development before reaching for remedies. New America. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570895.pdf
  67. Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 7197. 10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247
  68. Tzovla, E., Kedraka, K., & Kaltsidis, C. (2021). Investigating in-service elementary school teachers’ satisfaction with participating in MOOC for teaching biological concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3). 10.29333/ejmste/9729
  69. Wallace, L. E., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2020). When sources honestly provide their biased opinion: Bias as a distinct source perception with independent effects on credibility and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 439453. 10.1177/0146167219858654
  70. Wallace, M. R. (2009). Making sense of the links: Professional development, teacher practices, and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 573596. 10.1177/016146810911100205
  71. Walter, C., & Briggs, J. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers. Oxford University Press. https://www.oupjapan.co.jp/sites/default/files/contents/events/od2018/media/od18_Walter_reference.pdf
  72. Wehmeyer, M. L., & Field, S. L. (2007). Self-Determination: Instructional and assessment strategies. Cowin Press.
  73. Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121137. 10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2
  74. Yıldırım, B. (2022). MOOCs in STEM education: Teacher preparation and views. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(3), 663688. 10.1007/s10758-020-09481-3
  75. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
  76. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 9811015. 10.3102/0034654315626801
  77. Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Stegall, J., Losinki, M., & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). The construction and initial validation of the student teachers’ efficacy scale for teaching students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 3952. 10.1177/0741932516686059
Language: English
Page range: 610 - 626
Submitted on: May 23, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 3, 2024
Published on: Nov 29, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Marie-Pier Duchaine, Nancy Gaudreau, Éric Frenette, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.