Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Renewable Assignments: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions Cover

Renewable Assignments: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions

Open Access
|Nov 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Comparison Survey for Students and Faculty.

FACULTY (n = 1)STUDENTS (n = 24)t-TEST
Value
Q1: How valuable do you think your students found/did you find the work on the renewable assignments?4.003.83–0.89
Q5: The renewable assignment was more valuable to my students than other kinds of assignments./I found the renewable assignment to be more valuable than other kinds of assignments4.003.75–1.19
Interest
Q2: How interesting do you think your students found/ did you find the work on the renewable assignment to be, as compared to other kinds of assignments?4.003.75–1.93
Q6: The renewable assignment was more interesting to my students than other kinds of assignments./I found the renewable assignment to be more interesting than other kinds of assignments.4.003.88
Motivation–1.14
Q3: How motivating do you think your students found/ did you find the work on the renewable assignment to be, as compared to other kinds of assignments?4.003.58
Q7: The renewable assignment was more motivating to my students than other kinds of assignments./I found the renewable assignments to be more motivating than other kinds of assignments.4.003.63–0.72
Reward
Q4: How rewarding do you think your students found/ did you find the work on the renewable assignment to be, as compared to other kinds of assignments?5.003.71–7.21***
Q8: The renewable assignment was more rewarding to my students than other kinds of assignments./I found the renewable assignment to be more interesting than other kinds of assignments.5.003.83–6.23***

[i] Note: ***p < .001.

Table 2

Examples and Frequency of Themes of Perceived Benefits.

THEMEFREQUENCYEXAMPLE
Valuable5“I enjoy doing this kind of assignment even if it takes a lot of time and effort. Also working in a wider audience made me think my work is more valuable to others.”
Engaging5“I think it’s better because you were able to talk about things that the class seemed passionate about. You didn’t have to base what you taught on a book from 1993.”
Deep-learning4“I learned a lot more due to a feeling that I needed to provide deep and well-informed information about my topic to others.”
Teamwork3“Somebody had knowledge someone didn’t know so they shared, and everybody’s knowledge increased because of it.”

[i] N = 24.

Table 3

Examples and Frequency of Themes of Perceived Drawbacks.

THEMEFREQUENCYEXAMPLE
Issues with group work5“Working in groups when you can’t meet up is impossible.”
Lack of motivation4“It was hard to motivate myself to continue working on the assignment because it was spread out over the whole semester.”
Potential to cheat3“Students might cheat.”
Complicated2“It can be kind of stressful and came across as complicated at first.”

[i] N = 24.

Table 4

Faculty Reflection.

QUESTIONRESPONSE
Have you involved your students in open/renewable assignments before this semester?Yes
If so, was it in this same course, a different course, or both?Both
Were the primary learning materials in this course open educational resources?Yes
Were students asked to create new artifacts or revise/remix existing OER as part of this assignment?Yes
Did the new and/or adapted artifacts created by the students have value beyond supporting their learning as individuals?Yes
Were students invited to publicly share their new artifacts or revised/remixed OER?Yes
Were students invited to openly license their new artifacts or revised/remixed OER?Yes
What benefits did your students find in completing the open/renewable assignment?“Their work had a higher impact since it impacted more than just themselves. They are able to share this work as a part of a student portfolio as an example of good work that they have completed. They understand a bit more about Creative Commons permissions.”
What do you see as the major possible drawbacks of this kind of assignment for your students?“It was time-consuming. There was a large learning curve at the beginning. Some had trouble working with their group members. They did not understand the Creative Commons licensing at first.”

[i] N = 1.

Language: English
Page range: 514 - 525
Submitted on: May 17, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 2, 2024
Published on: Nov 29, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Julie Lazzara, Matthew Bloom, Virginia Clinton-Lisell, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.