Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Use of Open Educational Resources and Renewable Assignments in Social Work Ph.D. Programs in the United States Cover

The Use of Open Educational Resources and Renewable Assignments in Social Work Ph.D. Programs in the United States

Open Access
|Apr 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Types of OER used in the 13 PhD programs that use OER and courses in which they are used in a sample (N = 30) of top-ranked U.S. Social Work PhD programs.

VARIABLEn%
Textbooks1076.9
Courses using OER Textbooks (more than one could apply)
    Qualitative Research Methods330.0
    Quantitative Research Methods550.0
    Statistics110.0
    Policy110.0
    Theory550.0
    Pedagogy/Teaching in Higher Education220.0
    Other330.0
PowerPoints or Slides753.8
Courses using OER PowerPoints (more than one could apply)
    Qualitative Research Methods342.9
    Quantitative Research Methods685.7
    Statistics457.1
    Policy114.3
    Theory342.9
    Pedagogy/Teaching in Higher Education114.3
Audio/Video/Infographic/Other1184.6
Courses using audio/video/etc. OER (more than one could apply)
    Qualitative Research Methods545.5
    Quantitative Research Methods545.5
    Statistics19.1
    Policy327.3
    Theory1090.9
    Pedagogy/Teaching in Higher Education436.4
    Other19.1
Syllabus538.5
Courses using the OER syllabus (more than one could apply)
    Qualitative Research Methods240.0
    Quantitative Research Methods360.0
    Statistics360.0
    Policy120.0
    Theory360.0
    Pedagogy/Teaching in Higher Education240.0
    Other120.0
Elements (Lesson plans, modules, units, tutorials)646.2
Courses using OER elements (Lesson plans, modules, units, tutorials)
    Qualitative Research Methods233.3
    Quantitative Research Methods583.3
    Statistics350.0
    Policy116.7
    Theory466.7
    Pedagogy/Teaching in Higher Education350.0
    Other00.0

[i] Note: This table presents data from the 13 respondents who indicated using OER in their PhD programs. It does not include data from the 4 respondents who indicated their programs did not use OER or the 13 respondents who did not answer the items related to these variables on the questionnaire. One respondent indicated using OER test question banks or quizzes and one indicated “Other” OER were used.

Table 2

Perceptions of Open Educational Resources (OER) among 29 PhD program directors or informants from PhD programs in the top 100 ranked social work schools in the United States.

ITEM (EACH BEGINS WITH “USING OR CREATING OER CONTENT IN THE CLASSROOM…)MSDSTRONGLY AGREEAGREENEUTRALDISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
n%n%n%n%n%
increases students’ interest in the subject3.10.813.4517.22069.013.426.9
increases students’ satisfaction with the learning experience3.20.713.4827.61862.113.413.4
leads to improved student grades2.80.600.026.91965.5724.113.4
allows us to better accommodate diverse students’ needs3.50.9413.8827.61655.200.013.4
increases students’ engagement with lesson content3.21.026.9931.01448.326.926.9
increases collaboration and/or peer support among students3.10.813.4724.11655.2413.813.4
increases the likelihood that students will complete the PhD program2.70.800.0310.31965.5310.3413.8
Language: English
Page range: 180 - 194
Submitted on: Dec 5, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2024
Published on: Apr 3, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Faheem Ohri, Megan R. Westmore, LaTisha Thomas, Priyanjali Chakraborty, Rebecca L. Mauldin, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.