GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI
By: Aras Bozkurt
References
- Ali, M. J., & Djalilian, A. (2023). Readership Awareness Series – Paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT – Ethical Considerations in Scientific Publications. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 38(5), 403–404. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2193444
- Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2023). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 1–41. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4
- Bakla, A. (2023).
ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Publishing: An Overview of Ethical Issues . In G. Kartal (Ed.), Transforming the Language Teaching Experience in the Age of AI (pp. 89–101). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9893-4.ch005 - Bhatia, G., & Kulkarni, A. (2023). ChatGPT as Co-author: Are researchers impressed or distressed?. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 84,
103564 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103564 - Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75,
102370 . DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370 - Bozkurt, A. (2023a). Unleashing the potential of generative AI, conversational agents and chatbots in educational praxis: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of GenAI in education. Open Praxis, 15(4), 261–270. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.609
- Bozkurt, A. (2023b). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198–204. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7716416
- Bozkurt, A. (2023c). Generative AI, synthetic contents, open educational resources (OER), and open educational practices (OEP): A new front in the openness landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 1–7. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579
- Bozkurt, A. (2023d).
Creative academic writing and anatomy of a scholarly paper . In Conrad, D. (Ed.)., Research, writing, and creative process in open and distance education: Tales from the field (pp. 101–117). Open Book Publishers. DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0356 - Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Generative AI and prompt engineering: The art of whispering to let the genie out of the algorithmic world. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), i–vii. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8174941
- Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., Toquero, C. M., Singh, L., Tlili, A., Lee, K., Nichols, M., Ossiannilsson, E., Brown, M., Irvine, V., Raffaghelli, J. E., Santos-Hermosa, G., Farrell, O., Adam, T., Thong, Y. L., Sani-Bozkurt, S., Sharma, R. C., Hrastinski, S., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7636568
- Concannon, F., Costello, E., Farrell, O., Farrelly, T., & Graves Wolf, L. (2023). Editorial: There’s an AI for that: Rhetoric, reality, and reflections on EdTech in the dawn of GenAI. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(1). DOI: 10.22554/ijtel.v7i1.116
- COPE. (2023). Authorship and contributorship. Committee on Publication Ethics.
https://publicationethics.org/authorship - Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
- CSE. (2022). Recommendations for promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Council of Science Editors.
www.councilscienceeditors.org/recommendations-for-promoting-integrityin-Scientific-journal-publications - Currie, G. M. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 53(5), 719–730. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),
319 . DOI: 10.2307/249008 - Dempere, J., Modugu, K. P., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Dempere J, Modugu K, Hesham A and Ramasamy LK (2023) The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8,
1206936 . DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936 - Dien, J. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Plagiarism Problem. Biological Psychology,
108621 . DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621 - Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71,
102642 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 - Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13,
100060 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060 - Emsley, R. (2023). ChatGPT: these are not hallucinations–they’re fabrications and falsifications. Schizophrenia, 9(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41537-023-00379-4
- Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11). DOI: 10.3390/educsci13111109
- Gates, B. (2023). The Age of AI has begun. Gates Notes.
https://www.gatesnotes.com/The-Age-of-AI-Has-Begun - Harari, Y. N. (2023). Yuval Noah Harari argues that AI has hacked the operating system of human civilisation. The Economist.
https://www.economist.com/byinvitation/2023/04/28/yuval-noah-harari-argues-that-ai-has-hacked-the-operating-systemof-human-civilisation - Herbold, S., Hautli-Janisz, A., Heuer, U., Kikteva, Z., & Trautsch, A. (2023). A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays. Scientific Reports, 13(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45644-9
- ICMJE. (2022). Recommendations. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf - ICMJE. (2024). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html - Ide, K., Hawke, P., & Nakayama, T. (2023). Can ChatGPT be considered an author of a medical article? Journal of Epidemiology, 33(7), 381–382. DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20230030
- Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4),
ep464 . DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13605 - International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity, (3rd ed).
https://academicintegrity.org/resources/fundamental-values - Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4),
e202346 . DOI: 10.30935/ojcmt/13572 - Kirwan, A. (2023). ChatGPT and university teaching, learning and assessment: some initial reflections on teaching academic integrity in the age of Large Language Models. Irish Educational Studies, 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2023.2284901
- Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT Is Shaping the Future of Medical Writing But Still Requires Human Judgment. Radiology, 307(2). DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230171
- Lee, J. Y. (2023). Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article? Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20, 6. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.6
- Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1–35. DOI: 10.1145/3560815
- Lo, L. S. (2023). The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4),
102720 . DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720 - Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24750
- McGuire, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Rethinking Plagiarism, Digital Literacy, and the Ethics of Co-Authorship in Higher Education: A Position Paper and Comparative Critical Reflection of Composing Processes. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 21–31. DOI: 10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.131
- Nagarkar, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Impact of an artificial author on bibliometrics. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(2), 93–94. DOI: 10.20529/ijme.2023.029
- Nature. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
- O’Connor, S. (2023). Corrigendum to” Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?” [Nurse Educ. Pract. 66, 103537]. Nurse Education in Practice, 67,
103572 . DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103572 - O’Connor, S., & Chatgpt. (2023). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Education in Practice, 66,
103537 . DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537 - OpenAI. (2022). Introducing ChatGPT.
https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt - Perera Molligoda Arachchige, A. S., & Stomeo, N. (2023). Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Reply to Bom et al. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 57(5), 213–214. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-023-00816-3
- Rahimi, F., & Talebi Bezmin Abadi, A. (2023). Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51(11), 2340–2350. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03260-8
- Schroeder, R. (2023). In the coming weeks, how to respond to generative AI. Inside Higher Ed.
https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/online-trending-now/coming-weeks-how-respond-generative-ai - Semrl, N., Feigl, S., Taumberger, N., Bracic, T., Fluhr, H., Blockeel, C., & Kollmann, M. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead207
- Sharma, R. C., & Bozkurt, A. (Eds.) (2024). Transforming Education With Generative AI: Prompt Engineering and Synthetic Content Creation. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0
- Siegerink, B., Pet, L. A., Rosendaal, F. R., & Schoones, J. W. (2023). ChatGPT as an author of academic papers is wrong and highlights the concepts of accountability and contributorship. Nurse Education in Practice, 68, 103599–103599. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103599
- Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays–should professors worry? Nature. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
- Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620–621. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
- Tang, G. (2023a). Academic journals cannot simply require authors to declare that they used ChatGPT. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 –), 192(6), 3195–3196. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03374-x
- Tang, G. (2023b). Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers. Accountability in Research, 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2180359
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). Is ChatGPT a valid author? Nurse Education in Practice, 68,
103600 . DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600 - Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2023). Human- and AI-based authorship: Principles and ethics. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 453–462. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1547
- Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313–313. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg7879
- Weissman, J. (2023, February 9). ChatGPT is a plague uponeducation. Inside Higher Ed.
https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2023/02/09/chatgpt-plague-upon-education-opinion - Zielinski, C., Winker, M., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L., Heinemann, M., Florencio Lapeña, J., Pai, S., Ing, E., Citrome, L., & for the WAME Board. (2023). Chatbots, ChatGPT, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in relation to scholarly publications.
https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106 . DOI: 10.25100/cm.v54i3.5868
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 20, 2024
Published on: Feb 2, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2024 Aras Bozkurt, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.