Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI Cover

GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI

Open Praxis
Volume 16 (2024): Issue 1
By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2024
Figures & tables

Figures & Tables

Table 1

The ICMJE’s four criteria to claim authorship (ICMJE, 2024).

  1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND.

  2. Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; AND.

  3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND.

  4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 20, 2024
Published on: Feb 2, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Generative AI,
GenAI,
artificial intelligence,
AI,
AIEd,
chatbots,
conversational agents,
education,
teaching,
learning,
higher education,
educational technology,
GPT,
generative pre-trained transformer,
ChatGPT,
large language models,
LLMs,
natural language processing,
collaboration,
cocreating,
academic writing,
transparency in research,
authorship,
ownership,
ethics,
academic integrity

© 2024 Aras Bozkurt, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 16 (2024): Issue 1
Previous article
Next article