Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Critiquing Sustainable Openness in Technology-Based Education from the Perspective of Cost-Effectiveness and Accessibility Cover

Critiquing Sustainable Openness in Technology-Based Education from the Perspective of Cost-Effectiveness and Accessibility

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Lysenko, L. V., Marsh, J., & Gioko, A. (2014). Using educational technology to develop early literacy skills in Sub-Saharan Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 945964. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-014-9362-4
  2. Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., & Mooney, C. (2021). Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5088. DOI: 10.3390/app11115088
  3. Azim Premji Foundation. (2020). Myths of online education. In Field Studies in Education. Bangalore: Azim Premji Foundation. https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/field-studies-in-education/myths-of-online-education
  4. Bailey, B., Arciuli, J., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2016). Effects of ABRACADABRA literacy instruction on children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 257268. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000138
  5. Bakhla, N., Drèze, J., Paikra, V., & Khera, R. (2021). Locked out: Emergency report on school education in India. Road Scholarz. https://roadscholarz.net/locked-out-emergency-report-onschool-education/
  6. Benavides, L., Tamayo Arias, J., Arango Serna, M., Branch Bedoya, J., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20 (11), 3291. DOI: 10.3390/s20113291
  7. Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2018). An analysis of the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2013–2017. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 168183. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.4359
  8. Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (1), 1263. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12730.
  9. Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., & Pickup, D. (2022). Technology application in teaching and learning: Second-order review of meta-analyses. British Columbia: Commonwealth of Learning (COL). DOI: 10.56059/11599/4069
  10. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott Jr. D., et al. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1126. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3878572
  11. Bozkurt, A., & Stracke, C. M. (2023). The shift toward openness in education and the implications for learning ecosystems and ecologies. In D. Otto, G. Scharnberg, M. Kerres & O. Zawacki-Richter. (eds.), Distributed learning ecosystems (pp. 3146). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-38703-7_3
  12. Browne, T., Hewitt, R., Jenkins, M., Voce, J., Walker, R., & Yip, H. (2010). 2010 survey of technology enhanced learning for higher education in the UK. Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association. https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/-/media/Files/UCISA/Publication-files/Surveys/TEL-surveys/TEL-survey-2010_FINAL.pdf.
  13. Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., & Johnson, N. (2013). Examining the use of theory within educational technology and media research. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 337344. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.790315
  14. Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & DeGrande, M. (2012). Effect of a computer- delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3): 184191. DOI: 10.1177/0741932510381652.
  15. Butcher, N. (2014). Technologies in higher education: Mapping the terrain. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214737.pdf
  16. Clark, D. (2023). The construction of legitimacy: A critical discourse analysis of the rhetoric of educational technology in post-pandemic higher education. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2022.2163500
  17. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445449. DOI: 10.3102/00346543053004445
  18. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 2129. DOI: 10.1007/BF02299088
  19. Comaskey, E., Savage, R., & Abrami, P. C. (2009). A randomized efficacy study of web-based synthetic and analytic programmes among disadvantaged urban kindergarten children. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 92108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01383.x
  20. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
  21. Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2009). Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), 3035. DOI: 10.3200/CHNG.41.2.30-35
  22. De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education?: A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 8196. DOI: 10.1080/13600800500046255
  23. Echeverría, A., Améstica, M., & Gil, F., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, E., & Leclerc, S. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 11701177. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.027
  24. Erdem Aydin, İ., Bozkaya, M., & Genc Kumtepe, E. (2019). Research trends and issues in educational technology: Content analysis of TOJET (2012–2018). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4). http://www.tojet.net/articles/v18i4/1845.pdf
  25. Gilbertson, A., Dey, J., Singh, P., & Grills, N. (2023). The only option? Distance learning in North India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2023.2189734
  26. Hammond, R. (1997). A comparison of the learning experience of telecourse students in community and day sections. Paper presented at The Distance Learning Symposium, Utah Valley State College, August 20. (ERIC ED 410 992). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED410992.pdf
  27. Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.354
  28. Jewett, F. (1998). The Westnet program—SUNY Brockport and the SUNY campuses in Western New York State: A case study in the benefits and costs of an interactive television network 1998 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 301). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED420301.pdf
  29. Kuhn, C., Khoo, S. M., Czerniewicz, L., Lilley, W., Bute, S., Crean, A., Abegglen, S. et al. (2023). Understanding digital inequality: A theoretical kaleidoscope. Postdigit Sci Educ. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-023-00395-8
  30. Marín, V., Duart, J., Galvis, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Thematic analysis of the International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE) between 2004 and 2017. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(8), 17. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-018-0089-y
  31. Marín, V. I., Peters, L. N., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2022). (Open) Educational resources around the world: An international comparison. EdTechBooks. https://edtechbooks.org/oer_around_the_world
  32. Marshall, S. (2010). Change, technology and higher education: Are universities capable of organizational change? ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 8(3), 179192. DOI: 10.1080/09687769.2010.529107
  33. McBride, R. O., & Lewis, G. (1993). Sharing the resources: Electronic outreach programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(4), 372386. DOI: 10.1177/016235329301600404
  34. McClendon, M., & McArdle, M. (2002). Comparing alternative algebraic modalities for remedial students. Paper presented at Chair Academy Leadership Conference, Kansas City, MO, February 28–March 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED464658.pdf
  35. McNally, S., Ruiz-Valenzuela, J., & Rolfe, H. (2016). ABRA: Online reading support. Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/EEF_Project_Report_ABRA.pdf
  36. Mervyn, K., Simon, A., & Allen, D. K. (2014). Digital inclusion and social inclusion: A tale of two cities. Information Communication and Society, 17(9), 10861104. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.877952.
  37. Munro, M. (2018). The complicity of digital technologies in the marketisation of UK higher education: Exploring the implications of a critical discourse analysis of thirteen national digital teaching and learning strategies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(11). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0093-2
  38. Murris, K., Scott, F., Thomsen, B. S., Dixon, K., Giorza, T., Peers, J., & Lawrence, C. (2022). Researching digital inequalities in children’s play with technology in South Africa. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2022.2095570
  39. Muta, H., Kikuta, R., Hamano, T., & Maesako, T. (1997). The effectiveness of low-cost tele-lecturing. Staff and Educational Development International, 1(2), 129142. http://ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ572226&site=ehost-live
  40. Naughton, J. (2005). The 100 laptop question. The Guardian, December 4. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2005/dec/04/olpc.theobserver
  41. Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, M. K. (2000). Evaluation of a computer-based reading intervention in infant and junior schools. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 194209. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.00114
  42. O’Donovan, J., Ahn, R., Nelson, B. D., Kagan, C., & Burke, T. F. (2016). Using low-cost android tablets and instructional videos to teach clinical skills to medical students in Kenya: A prospective study. JRSM Open, 7(8). DOI: 10.1177/2054270416645044
  43. Prinsloo, P. (2018). 反思2017年多伦多在线学习世界大会:我听到的和没有听到的[What I heard and what I did not hear: Reflections on the World Conference on Online Learning, Toronto, 2017]. 《中国远程教 育》[Distance Education in China], 2, 511. DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20180125.002
  44. Reeves, T., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 19912001. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09811-3
  45. Rice, D. (2010). ICT for inclusion: Reaching more students more effectively. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://iite.unesco.org/publications/3214675/
  46. Rouse, C. E., & Krueger, A. B. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a “scientifically based” reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 323338. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.10.005
  47. Russell, T. L. (1999). The No significant difference phenomenon. North Carolina State University, Office of Instructional Telecommunication.
  48. Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  49. Selwyn, N. (2023). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
  50. Troia, G. A. (2004). Migrant students with limited english proficiency: Can fast forword language make a difference in their language skills and academic achievement? Remedial and Special Education, 25(6), 353366. DOI: 10.1177/07419325040250060301
  51. United Nations. (1948). The universal declaration of human rights. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/666853?ln=zh_CN
  52. Vanian, J., & Leswing, K. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI are booming, but the costs can be extraordinary. CNBC, March 13. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/chatgpt-and-generative-ai-are-booming-but-at-a-very-expensive-price.html
  53. Wang, F., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Why do teachers need to use technology in their classrooms? Issues, problems, and solutions. Computers in the Schools, 20(4), 4965. DOI: 10.1300/J025v20n04_05
  54. Wolgemuth, J., Savage, R., Helmer, J., Lea, T., Harper, H., Chalkiti, K., Bottrell, C., & Abrami, P. (2011). Using computer-based instruction to improve indigenous early literacy in Northern Australia: A quasi-experimental study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.947
  55. World Bank. (2018). Technology offers new possibilities for teaching and learning. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/731401541081357776/pdf/131640-BRI-technoligies-PUBLIC-Series-World-Bank-Education-Overview.pdf
  56. World Bank. (2020). Reimagining human connections: Technology and innovation in education at the World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/829491606860379513/pdf/Reimagining-Human-Connections-Technology-and-Innovation-in-Education-at-the-World-Bank.pdf
  57. Worth, J., Nelson, J., Harland, J., Bernardinelli, D., & Styles, B. (2018). GraphoGame Rime: Evaluation report and executive summary. National Foundation for Educational Research. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/GraphoGame_Rime.pdf
  58. Xiao, J. 2019. “Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Critiquing the Five-Year Development Plans (2016–2020) of 75 Chinese Universities.” Distance Education, 40(4): 515533. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2019.1680272
  59. Xiao, J. (2023). Critical Issues in open and distance education research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(2), 213228. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.6881
  60. Xiao, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). China’s approach to digital transformation of higher education: Digital infrastructure and (open) educational resources. In V. I. Marín, L. N. Peters, & O. Zawacki-Richter (eds.), (Open) educational resources around the world: An international comparison (pp. 109181). EdTechBooks. https://edtechbooks.org/oer_around_the_world
  61. Yarnall, L., Means, B., & Wetzel, T. (2016). Lessons learned from early implementations of adaptive courseware. SRI International. https://www.sri.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/almap_final_report.pdf
  62. Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education – a Delphi study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 117. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674
  63. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (Hrsg.) (2014). Online distance education – towards a research agenda. http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120233
  64. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 122, 136152. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001
  65. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Language: English
Page range: 244 - 254
Submitted on: Jun 14, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2023
Published on: Sep 5, 2023
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Junhong Xiao, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.