Investigation of Kyrgyz Learners’ Engagement in Online Courses
References
- Afacan Adanır, G., Muhametjanova, G., Çelikbağ, M. A., Omuraliev, A., & İsmailova, R. (2020). Learners’ preferences for online resources, activities, and communication tools: a comparative study of Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(2), 148–166. DOI: 10.1177/2042753019899713
- Akuratiya, D. A., & Meddage, D. N. (2020). Students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of IT students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(9), 755–758.
- Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
https://itdl.org/Journal/Jan_15/Jan15.pdf - Butler, J. M. (2011).
Using standardized tests to assess institution-wide student engagement . In R. L. Miller, E. Amsel, B. Kowalewski, B. Beins, K. Keith, & B. Peden, (Eds.). Promoting student engagement, volume 1: Programs, techniques and opportunities (pp. 258–264). Academia. - Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students’ academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. The Internet and Higher Education, 21(2014), 25–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
- Datareportal. (2019). Digital 2019: Kyrgyzstan [PowerPoint slides]. Datareportal.
https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-kyrgyzstan - Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2) 1–13.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079585.pdf - Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). DOI: 10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
- Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005).
School engagement . In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19 - Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. DOI: 10.3102/00346543074001059
- Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1).
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103654.pdf - Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19: Key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 3–16.
- Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017, June). Student engagement in online learning: A review. Proceedings of 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 39–43.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8005384 . DOI: 10.1109/ISET.2017.17 - Internet World Stats. (2019). KYRGYZSTAN (Kyrgyz Republic) [Data set].
https://www.Internetworldstats.com/asia.htm#kg - Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2), 1–7.
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=ijahsp/ . DOI: 10.46743/1540-580X/2005.1071 - Jones, R. D. (2008). Strengthening student engagement [White paper]. International Center for Leadership in Education.
https://www.literacytakesflight.com/uploads/7/8/9/3/7893595/strengthen_student_engagement_white_paper.pdf - Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203–218. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Li, F., Qi, J., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom vs e-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioral engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(2), 48–51. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3268
- Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247. DOI: 10.1037/a0021307
- Louwrens, N., & Hartnett, M. (2015). Student and teacher perceptions of online student engagement in an online middle school. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 19(1), 27–44.
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/151619/ - Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
- Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement online: What works and why. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/aehe.20018
- Morris, O. (2012). Faculty choice and student perception of web based technologies for interaction in online economics courses. [Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University]. Proquest.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1125280856 - Muhametjanova, G., Afacan Adanır, G., & Akmatbekova, A. (2020). Internet and social networks use habits of adolescents between ages of 10–19 in the Kyrgyz Republic. Journal of Children and Media, 14(2), 173–186. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2019.1684965
- Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783–793. DOI: 10.25215/0802.094
- Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992).
The significance and sources of student engagement . In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED371047.pdf#page=16 - Northrup, P. T. (2002). Online learners’ preferences for interaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2). 219–226.
- Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23–37. DOI: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
- Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in health sciences education, 16(4), 465–479. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
- Shukor, N. A., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H., & Harun, J. (2014). A predictive model to evaluate students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 4844–4853. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1036
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
- Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
- Tsay, C. H. H., Kofinas, A., & Luo, J. (2018). Enhancing student learning experience with technology-mediated gamification: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 121(2018), 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.009
- Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.158 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 121
Submitted on: Sep 27, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 25, 2022
Published on: Dec 9, 2022
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Gülgün Afacan Adanır, Gulshat Muhametjanova, Azat Akmatbekova, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.