Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments Cover

Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments

Open Access
|Jan 2017

References

  1. Lewandowski J. Renovascular hypertension: is it only the top of the iceberg? Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2003; 15:371-5.14974369
  2. Hartman RP, Kawashima A. Radiologic evaluation of suspected renovascular hypertension. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 80:273-9.19621837
  3. Plouin P, Bax L. Diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010; 6:151-9.10.1038/nrneph.2009.23020101256
  4. Eriksson P, Mohammed AA, De Geer J, Kihlberg J, Persson A, Granerus G, et al. Non-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 3607-14.2048881910.1093/ndt/gfq259
  5. Stacul F, Gava S, Belgrano M, Cernic S, Pagnan L, Pozzi Mucelli F, et al. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA. Radiol Med. 2008; 113:529-46.10.1007/s11547-008-0270-918480971
  6. Wilson GJ, Maki JH. Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 tesla. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009; 17:13-27.10.1016/j.mric.2009.01.00219364597
  7. Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y, Komeda Y, Okigawa T, Urata J, et al. Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ J. 2008; 72:1627-30.1872833410.1253/circj.CJ-08-0005
  8. Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Woodrum DA, Stanley DW, Takei N, et al. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31:1411-8.2051289410.1002/jmri.22194
  9. Ultrasound assessment of native renal vessels and renal allografts. In : Zwiebel WJ, Pellerito JS, editors. Introduction of vascular ultrasonography. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005:618-9.
  10. Vasbinder GBC, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AGH, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JMA. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135:401-11.10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-0000911560453
  11. Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalak E, Koukoulis G, et al. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR Angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Ren Fail. 2007; 29:295-302.1749744310.1080/08860220601166305
  12. Eklof H, Ahlström H, Magnusson A, Andersson LG, Andren B, Hagg A, et al. Prospective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosis. Acta Radil. 2006; 47:764-74.10.1080/02841850600849092
  13. Solar M, Zizka J, Krajina A, Michl A, Raupach J, Klzo L, et al. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2011; 54:9-12.21542417
  14. Mitsue M, Vivian SL. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2008; 248:20-43.1856616810.1148/radiol.2481071497
  15. Angeretti MG Lumia D, Cani A, Barresi M, Cardim Nocchi L, Piacentino F et al. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Acta Radiol. 2013; 54:749-56.2355018710.1177/0284185113482690
  16. Khoo MM, Deeab D, Gedroyc WM, Duncan N, Taube D, Dick EA. Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21:1470-6.10.1007/s00330-011-2086-621337034
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0903.406 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 373 - 378
Published on: Jan 31, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Siripat Saejeung, Kawalee Sasiwimolphan, Laddawan Vajragupta, Somjai Wangsuphachart, Monravee Tumkosit, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.