Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Music Perception Toolbox: Analytical Methods for Pitch and Rhythm Similarity, Consonance, Complexity, and Structure Cover

The Music Perception Toolbox: Analytical Methods for Pitch and Rhythm Similarity, Consonance, Complexity, and Structure

By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Amiot, E. (2016). Music Through Fourier Space: Discrete Fourier Transform in Music Theory. Computational Music Science. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-45581-5.
  2. Balzano, G. J. (1982). The pitch set as a level of description for studying musical perception. In M. Clynes (Ed.), Music, Mind, and Brain: The Neuropsychology of Music (pp. 321–351). Plenum Press. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8917-0_17.
  3. Carey, N. (2002). On coherence and sameness, and the evaluation of scale candidacy claims. Journal of Music Theory, 46(1/2), 1–56. 10.1215/00222909-46-1-2-1.
  4. Carey, N. (2007). Coherence and sameness in well‑formed and pairwise well‑formed scales. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 1(2), 79–98. 10.1080/17459730701376743.
  5. Dean, R. T., Milne, A. J., and Bailes, F. (2019). Spectral pitch similarity is a predictor of perceived change in sound‑ as well as note‑based music. Music & Science, 2, 2059204319847351. 10.1177/2059204319847351.
  6. Eck, D. (2006). Identifying metrical and temporal structure with an autocorrelation phase matrix. Music Perception, 24(2), 167–176. 10.1525/MP.2006.24.2.167.
  7. Eerola, T., and Lahdelma, I. (2021). The anatomy of consonance/dissonance: Evaluating acoustic and cultural predictors across multiple datasets with chords. Music & Science, 4, 20592043211030471. 10.1177/20592043211030471.
  8. Eerola, T., and Toiviainen, P. (2004). MIR in MATLAB: The MIDI toolbox. In 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval. International Society for Music Information Retrieval.
  9. Eitel, M., Ruth, N., Harrison, P., Frieler, K., and Müllensiefen, D. (2024). Perception of chord sequences modeled with prediction by partial matching, voice‑leading distance, and spectral pitch‑class similarity: A new approach for testing individual differences in harmony perception. Music & Science, 7, 20592043241257654. 10.1177/20592043241257654.
  10. Harrison, P. M. C., and Pearce, M. T. (2020). Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition. Psychological Review, 127(2), 216–244. 10.1037/rev0000169.
  11. Hearne, L. M. (2020). The Cognition of Harmonic Tonality in Microtonal Scales. (Doctoral dissertation). Western Sydney University. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:58606.
  12. Hearne, L. M., Dean, R. T., and Milne, A. J. (2026). Acoustical and cultural explanations for contextual tonal stability. Music Perception, 1–23. 10.1525/mp.2026.2472336.
  13. Homer, S. T., Harley, N., and Wiggins, G. A. (2024). Modelling of musical perception using spectral knowledge representation. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 32. 10.5334/joc.356.
  14. Huron, D. (2008). A comparison of average pitch height and interval size in major‑ and minor‑key themes: Evidence consistent with affect‑related pitch prosody. Empirical Musicology Review, 3(2), 59–63. 10.18061/1811/31941.
  15. Hutchinson, W., and Knopoff, L. (1978). The acoustic component of western consonance. Interface, 7, 1–29. 10.1080/09298217808570246.
  16. Kameoka, A., and Kuriyagawa, M. (1969). Consonance theory parts 1 and 2. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45(6), 1451–1469. 10.1121/1.1911623.
  17. Krumhansl, C. L., and Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89(4), 334–368. 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.334.
  18. Lartillot, O., Toiviainen, P., and Eerola, T. (2008). A Matlab toolbox for music information retrieval. In C. Preisach, H. Burkhardt, L. Schmidt‑Thieme, and R. Decker (Eds.), Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications (pp. 261–268). Springer‑Verlag. 10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_31.
  19. Mashinter, K. (2006). Calculating sensory dissonance: Some discrepancies arising from the models of Kameoka & Kuriyagawa, and Hutchinson & Knopoff. Empirical Musicology Review, 1(2), 65–84. 10.18061/1811/24077.
  20. Milne, A. J. (2013). A Computational Model of the Cognition of Tonality. (Doctoral dissertation). The Open University. 10.21954/ou.ro.00009783.
  21. Milne, A. J. (2019). XronoMorph: Investigating paths through rhythmic space. In S. Holland, T. Mudd, K. Wilkie‑McKenna, A. P. McPherson, and M. M. Wanderley (Eds.), New Directions in Music and Human‑Computer Interaction (pp. 95–113). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_6.
  22. Milne, A. J. (2024). Commentary on Buechele, Cooke, & Berezovsky (2024): Entropic models of scales and some extensions. Empirical Musicology Review, 19(2), 144–153. 10.18061/emr.v19i2.10085.
  23. Milne, A. J., Bulger, D., and Herff, S. A. (2017). Exploring the space of perfectly balanced rhythms and scales. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 11(2–3), 101–133. 10.1080/17459737.2017.1395915.
  24. Milne, A. J., and Dean, R. T. (2016). Computational creation and morphing of multilevel rhythms by control of evenness. Computer Music Journal, 40(1), 35–53. 10.1162/COMJ_a_00343.
  25. Milne, A. J., Dean, R. T., and Bulger, D. (2023a). The effects of rhythmic structure on tapping accuracy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(8), 2673–2699. 10.3758/s13414-023-02778-2.
  26. Milne, A. J., and Herff, S. A. (2020). The perceptual relevance of balance, evenness, and entropy in musical rhythms. Cognition, 203, 104233. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104233.
  27. Milne, A. J., and Holland, S. (2016). Empirically testing voiceleading, Tonnetz, and spectral models of perceived triadic distance. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 10(1), 59–85. 10.1080/17459737.2016.1152517.
  28. Milne, A. J., Laney, R., and Sharp, D. B. (2015). A spectral pitch class model of the probe tone data and scalic tonality. Music Perception, 32(4), 364–393. 10.1525/mp.2015.32.4.364.
  29. Milne, A. J., Laney, R., and Sharp, D. B. (2016). Testing a spectral model of tonal affinity with microtonal melodies and inharmonic spectra. Musicae Scientiae, 20(4), 465–494. 10.1177/1029864915622682.
  30. Milne, A. J., Sethares, W. A., Laney, R., and Sharp, D. B. (2011). Modelling the similarity of pitch collections with expectation tensors. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 5(1), 1–20. 10.1080/17459737.2011.573678.
  31. Milne, A. J., Smit, E. A., Sarvasy, H. S., and Dean, R. T. (2023b). Evidence for a universal association of auditory roughness with musical stability. PLOS One, 18(9), e0291642. 10.1371/journal.pone.0291642.
  32. Parncutt, R. (1988). Revision of Terhardt’s psychoacoustical model of the root(s) of a musical chord. Music Perception, 6(1), 65–94. 10.2307/40285416.
  33. Parncutt, R. (2006). Commentary on Keith Mashinter’s “Calculating sensory dissonance: Some discrepancies arising from the models of Kameoka & Kuriyagawa, and Hutchinson & Knopoff”. Empirical Musicology Review, 1(4), 201–204. 10.18061/1811/24148.
  34. Pearce, M. (2018). Statistical learning and probabilistic prediction in music cognition: Mechanisms of stylistic enculturation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423, 378–395. 10.1111/nyas.13654.
  35. Plomp, R., and Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38(4), 548–560. 10.1121/1.1909741.
  36. Quinn, I. (2007). General equal‑tempered harmony: Parts two and three. Perspectives of New Music, 45(1), 4–63. 10.1353/pnm.2007.0016.
  37. Rothenberg, D. (1977). A model for pattern perception with musical applications part I: Pitch structures as order‑preserving maps. Mathematical Systems Theory, 11(1), 199–234. 10.1007/BF01768477.
  38. Sethares, W. A. (1993). Local consonance and the relationship between timbre and scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1218–1228. 10.1121/1.408175.
  39. Sethares, W. A. (2005). Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale (2nd ed.). Springer Verlag. 10.1007/b138848.
  40. Sethares, W. A., Milne, A. J., Tiedje, S., Prechtl, A., and Plamondon, J. (2009). Spectral tools for Dynamic Tonality and audio morphing. Computer Music Journal, 33(2), 71–84. 10.1162/comj.2009.33.2.71.
  41. Smit, E. A., Milne, A. J., Dean, R. T., and Weidemann, G. (2019). Perception of affect in unfamiliar musical chords. PLOS One, 14(6), 1–28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0218570.
  42. Smit, E. A., Milne, A. J., Sarvasy, H. S., and Dean, R. T. (2022). Emotional responses in Papua New Guinea show negligible evidence for a universal effect of major versus minor music. PLOS One, 17(6), e0269597. 10.1371/journal.pone.0269597.
  43. Temperley, D., and Tan, D. (2013). Emotional connotations of diatonic modes. Music Perception, 30(3), 237–257. 10.1525/MP.2012.30.3.237.
  44. Tenney, J. (1988). A History of ‘Consonance’ and ‘Dissonance’. Excelsior Music.
  45. Tymoczko, D. (2023). Tonality: An Owner’s Manual. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197577103.001.0001.
  46. Undy, C., Dean, R. T., and Milne, A. J. (2026). An algorithm for human embodiment and computational realization of familiar and novel African/clave rhythm. Leonardo, 59(3), 301–309. 10.1162/leon_a_02716.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.392 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Page range: 526 - 543
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2026
Published on: Oct 6, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Andrew J. Milne, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.