Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Disaffiliation from the Evangelical Lutheran Churches in the Nordic Countries: Mistrust in the Churches, Changing Worldviews, or Something else? Cover

Disaffiliation from the Evangelical Lutheran Churches in the Nordic Countries: Mistrust in the Churches, Changing Worldviews, or Something else?

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. 1Baker, JO and Smith, BG. 2009. The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffiliated. Social Forces, 87: 12511263. DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0181
  2. 2Bruce, S. 2002. God is Dead: Secularization in the West. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  3. 3Bruce, S. 2011. Secularization: In Defence of an Unfashionable Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199654123.001.0001
  4. 4Casanova, J. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001
  5. 5Casanova, J. 2001. Secularization. In: Smelser, NJ and Baltes, PB (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, pp. 383387. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04021-3
  6. 6Chernoff, H. 1973. The Use of Faces to Represent Points in k-Dimensional Space Graphically. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68: 361368. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10482434
  7. 7Cheyne, JA. 2010. The Rise of the Nones and the Growth of Religious Indifference. Skeptic, 15: 5660.
  8. 8Church-of.Denmark. 2022. Folkekirkens Medlemmer [online]. Available from https://www.folkekirken.dk/om-folkekirken/folkekirken-i-tal/medlemmer. [Accessed 08-08-2022].
  9. 9Church-of-Sweden. 2022. Svenska Kirkan [online]. Available from https://www.svenskakyrkan.se/statistik. [Accessed 08-08-2022].
  10. 10Conover, WJ and Iman, RL. 1979. On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. 87545.
  11. 11Davie, G. 1990. Believing without Belonging: Is This the Future of Religion in Britain? Social Compass, 37: 455469. DOI: 10.1177/003776890037004004
  12. 12Davie, G. 2015. Studying Religion in the Nordic Countries: An External View. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 28: 101116. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2015-02-01
  13. 13Demerath, N. 2000. The Rise of “Cultural Religion” in European Christianity: Learning from Poland, Northern Ireland, and Sweden. Social Compass, 47(1): 127139. DOI: 10.1177/003776800047001013
  14. 14Dobbelaere, K. 1999. Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60(3): 229247. DOI: 10.2307/3711935
  15. 15Dobbelaere, K. 2006. Testing Secularization Theory in Comparative Perspective. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 20: 137147. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2007-02-01
  16. 16Donnely, S and Inglis, T. 2010. The Media and the Catholic Church in Ireland: Reporting Clerical Child Sex Abuse. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 25: 119. DOI: 10.1080/13537900903416788
  17. 17Field, CD. 2014. Another Window on British Secularization: Public Attitudes to Church and Clergy Since the 1960’s. Contemporary British History, 28: 190218. DOI: 10.1080/13619462.2014.923765
  18. 18Finke, R and Stark, R. 2003. The Dynamics of Religious Economies. In: Dillon, M (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96109. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807961.008
  19. 19Flere, S. 2007. Gender and Religious Orientation. Social Compass, 54: 239254. DOI: 10.1177/0037768607077035
  20. 20Fox, J. 2016. polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations. R package version 0.7–9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=polycor.
  21. 21Francis, LJ. 1997. The Psychology of Gender Differences in Religion: A Review of Empirical Research. Religion, 27: 8196. DOI: 10.1006/reli.1996.0066
  22. 22From, EH. 2022. State and (Non)religion: Perspectives from Nones in Oslo. In: Zwilling, AL and Årsheim, H (eds.), Nonreligion in Late Modern Societies. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92395-2
  23. 23Furseth, I. 2018a. Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries. Gewerbestrasse 11: 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. 24Furseth, I. 2018b. Secularization, Deprivatization, or Religious Complexity? In: Furseth, I (ed.), Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries. Gewerbestrasse 11: 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 291312. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_7
  25. 25Furseth, I, Ahlin, L, Ketola, K, Leis-Peters, A and Sigurvinsson, BR. 2018. Changing Religious Landscapes in the Nordic Countries. In: Furseth, I (ed.), Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries. Gewerbestrasse 11: 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3180. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_2
  26. 26Galen, LW. 2018. Focusing on the nonreligious reveals secular mechanisms underlying well-being and prosociality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3): 296306. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000202
  27. 27Gervais, WM and Najle, MB. 2015. Learned Faith: The Influences of Evolved Cultural Learning Mechanisms on Belief in Gods. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7: 327335. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000044
  28. 28Graves, S, Piepho, HP and Selzer, S. 2019. multcompView: Visualizations of Paired Comparisons. R package version 0.1–8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multcompView.
  29. 29Group, ISSPR. 2020. International Social Survey Programme: Religion IV – ISSP 2018. Version 2.0.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. ZA7570 Data file Version 2.1.0.
  30. 30Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ and Anderson, RE. 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  31. 31Hammer, JH and Cragun, RT. 2019. Daily spiritual experiences and well-being among the nonreligious, spiritual, and religious: A bifactor analysis. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(4): 463473. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000248
  32. 32Heinrich, J. 2009. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30: 244260. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
  33. 33Hoffmann, JP. 1998. Confidence in Religious Institutions and Secularization: Trends and Implications. Review of Religious Research, 39: 321343. DOI: 10.2307/3512442
  34. 34Hoffmann, JP. 2013. Declining Religious Authority? Confidence in the Leaders of Religious Organizations, 1973–2010. Review of Religious Research, 55: 125. DOI: 10.1007/s13644-012-0090-1
  35. 35Holm, S. 1979. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6: 6570.
  36. 36Hosmer, D, Lemeshow, S and Sturdivant, RX. 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118548387
  37. 37Hungerman, DM. 2014. The effect of education on religion: Evidence from compulsory schooling laws. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 104: 5263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.004
  38. 38Iannaccone, L. 1992. Religious Markets and the Economics of Religion. Social Compass, 39: 123131. DOI: 10.1177/003776892039001012
  39. 39Iannaccone, LR. 1991. The Consequences of Religious Market Structure: Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion. Rationality and Society, 3(2): 156177. DOI: 10.1177/1043463191003002002
  40. 40Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Penguin Books.
  41. 41Kasselstrand, I, Couse, T and Sanchez, S. 2017. Institutional Confidence in the United States: Attitudes of Secular Americans. Secularism and Nonreligion, 6: 111. DOI: 10.5334/snr.80
  42. 42Kasselstrand, I and Eltanani, MK. 2013. Church Affiliation and Trust in the State: Survey Data Evidence from Nordic Countries. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 26: 103119. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2013-02-01
  43. 43Keysar, A. 2014. Shifts Along the American Religious-Secular Spectrum. Secularism & Nonreligion, 3: 116. DOI: 10.5334/snr.am
  44. 44Kruskal, WH and Wallis, WA. 1952. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47: 583621. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
  45. 45Langston, J, Speed, D and Coleman, TJ. 2020. Predicting age of atheism: Credibility enhancing displays and religious importance, choice, and conflict in family of upbringing. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10(1): 4967. DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2018.1502678
  46. 46Lanman, JA. 2012. The Importance of Religious Displays for Belief Acquisition and Secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27: 4965. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2012.642726
  47. 47Lanman, JA and Burmester, MD. 2017. Religious actions speak louder than words: exposure to credibility enhancing displays predicts theism. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 7: 316. DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011
  48. 48Lawson, ET and McCauley, RN. 1990. Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  49. 49Leibniz-Institute-for-Social-Sciences. 2008. GESIS: ZACAT. https://www.gesis.org/en/eurobarometer-data-service/search-data-access/data-access.
  50. 50Lemos, CM, Gore, RJ, Puga-Gonzalez, I and Shults, FL. 2019. Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme, PLoS ONE, 14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216352
  51. 51Lemos, C and Puga-Gonzalez, I. 2021. Belief in God, Confidence in the Church and Secularization in Scandinavia. Secularism and Nonreligion, 10: 121. DOI: 10.5334/snr.143
  52. 52Lövheim, M, Lindberg, J, Botvar, PK, Christensen, HR, Niemelä, K and Bäckström, A. 2018. Religion on the Political Agenda. In: Furseth, I (ed.), Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries. Gewerbestrasse 11: 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 137191. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_4
  53. 53Lüchau, P and Andersen, PB. 2012. Socio-Economic Factors behind Disaffiliation from the Danish National Church. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 25: 2745. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2012-01-02
  54. 54Lugo, L. 2012. Nones” on the Rise: One-in-five Adults Have No Religious Affiliation. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
  55. 55Mahlamäki, T. 2012. Religion and atheism from a gender perspective. Approaching Religion, 2: 5865. DOI: 10.30664/ar.67492
  56. 56McCauley, RN and Lawson, ET. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511606410
  57. 57Merino, SM. 2012. Irreligious Socialization? The Adult Religious Preferences of Individuals Raised with No religion. Secularism and Nonreligion, 1: 116. DOI: 10.5334/snr.aa
  58. 58Meuleman, B and Billiet, J. 2011. Religious Involvement: Its Relation to Values and Social Attitudes. In: Davidov, E, Schmidt, P and Billiet, J (eds.), Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, United States of America: Routledge. pp. 173206.
  59. 59Mueller, GH. 1980. The Dimensions of Religiosity. Sociological Analysis, 41: 119. DOI: 10.2307/3709855
  60. 60Nagelkerke, NJD. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78: 691692. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
  61. 61Nicolet, S and Tresch, A. 2009. From practicing Christians to post-traditional believers? The evolution of “belonging” and “believing” in Western Europe. European Consortium for Political Reasearch. Workshop 1: Moral values, cultural change, and post-materialism in Europe and North America, April 14–19. Lisbon, Portugal.
  62. 62Nielsen, MV and Kühle, L. 2011. Religion and State in Denmark: Exception among Exceptions? Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 24: 173188. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2011-02-05
  63. 63Niemelä, K. 2007. Alienated or Disappointed? Reasons for Leaving the Church in Finland. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 20: 195216. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2007-02-05
  64. 64Norenzayan, A and Gervais, WM. 2013. The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17: 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006
  65. 65Norris, P and Inglehart, R. 2011. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894862
  66. 66Pohlert, T. 2021. PMCMRplus: Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums Extended, R package version 1.9.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMRplus.
  67. 67Pregibon, D. 1981. Logistic Regression Diagnostics. The Annals of Statistics, 9: 705724. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176345513
  68. 68R-Core-Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  69. 69Revelle, W. 2022. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research, R package version 2.2.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
  70. 70Shaffer, JP. 1995. Multiple Hypothesis Testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 46: 561584. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.003021
  71. 71Stark, R. 1996. Why Religious Movements Succeed or Fail: A Revised General Model. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 11: 133146. DOI: 10.1080/13537909608580764
  72. 72Stark, R and Iannaccone, L. 1994. A Supple-Side Reinterpretation of the Secularization in Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33: 230252. DOI: 10.2307/1386688
  73. 73Statistics Finland. 2022. Population Structure [online]. Available from https://tilastokeskus.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html#structure. [Accessed 08-08-2022].
  74. 74Stolz, J. 2020. Secularization theories in the twenty-first century: Ideas, evidence, and problems. Presidential address. Social Compass, 67: 282308. DOI: 10.1177/0037768620917320
  75. 75Stolz, J and Könemann, J. 2016. A Theory of Religious-Secular Competition. In: Stolz, J, et al. (eds.), (Un)believing in Modern Society: Religion, Spirituality, and Religious-Secular Competition. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1150. DOI: 10.4324/97813115562711
  76. 76Storm, I and Voas, D. 2012. The Intergenerational Transmission of Religious Service Attendance. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 25: 131150. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2012-02-02
  77. 77Trzebiatowska, M and Bruce, S. 2012. Why are women more religious than men. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608102.001.0001
  78. 78Tschannen, O. 1991. The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(4): 395415. DOI: 10.2307/1387276
  79. 79Urstad, SS. 2017. The Religiously Unaffiliated in Norway. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 30: 6181. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2017-01-04
  80. 80Voas, D and Storm, I. 2012. The Intergenerational Transmission of Churchgoing in England and Australia. Review of Religious Research, 53: 377395. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2012.642725
  81. 81Voicu, M. 2009. Religion and Gender Across Europe. Social Compass, 56: 144162. DOI: 10.1177/0037768609103350
  82. 82Walter, T and Davie, G. 1998. The Religiosity of Women in the Modern West. The British Journal of Sociology, 49: 640660. DOI: 10.2307/591293
  83. 83Wilson, BR. 2016. Religion in Secular Society: Fifty Years On. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198788379.001.0001
  84. 84Wolf, HP. 2019. aplpack: Another Plot Package (version 190512), https://cran.r-project.org/package=aplpack.
  85. 85Wright, SP. 1992. Adjusted P-values for Simultaneous Inference. International Biometric Society, 48: 10051013. DOI: 10.2307/2532694
  86. 86Zuckerman, P. 2009. Why are the Danes and Swedes so Irreligious? Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 22: 5569. DOI: 10.2307/2532694
  87. 87Zuckerman, P. 2020. Society without God, Second Edition: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment, New York, USA: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479851119.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.166 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 20, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 18, 2024
Published on: Jun 26, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Carlos Miguel Lemos, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.