Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Taking Fun Seriously: A Scoping Review of Frameworks, Outcomes, and Definitions of Fun in Education Cover

Taking Fun Seriously: A Scoping Review of Frameworks, Outcomes, and Definitions of Fun in Education

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Kassab SE, Al-Eraky M, El-Sayed W, et al. Measurement of student engagement in health professions education: a review of literature. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):354. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04344-8
  2. Bakker AB, Mostert K. Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education. Educ Psychol Rev. 2024;36(3):92. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8
  3. de Bruin ABH, Biwer F, Hui L, et al. Worth the Effort: the Start and Stick to Desirable Difficulties (S2D2) Framework. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(2):41. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09766-w
  4. Evans P, Vansteenkiste M, Parker P, et al. Cognitive Load Theory and Its Relationships with Motivation: a Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Educ Psychol Rev. 2024;36(1):7. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09841-2
  5. Grund A, Fries S, Nückles M, et al. When is Learning “Effortful”? Scrutinizing the Concept of Mental Effort in Cognitively Oriented Research from a Motivational Perspective. Educ Psychol Rev. 2024;36(1):11. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-024-09852-7
  6. Tews MJ, Noe RA. Does training have to be fun? A review and conceptual model of the role of fun in workplace training. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2019;29(2):226–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.11.003
  7. Tews MJ, Michel JW, Noe RA. Does fun promote learning? The relationship between fun in the workplace and informal learning. J Vocat Behav. 2017;98:46–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.006
  8. Tews MJ, Jackson K, Ramsay C, et al. Fun in the college classroom: examining its nature and relationship with student engagement. Coll Teach. 2015a;63(1):16–26. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2014.972318
  9. Eva KW, Cummings BA. With great power comes great responsibility: How narrow conceptions of validity in high-stakes testing undermine competence. Med Educ. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/medu.70252
  10. D’Eon MF. The overcrowded curriculum is alarming. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(4):1–5. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.78084
  11. Tasci ADA, Ko YJ. A FUN-SCALE for understanding the hedonic value of a product: the destination context. J Travel Tour Mark. 2016;33(2):162–183. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2015.1038421
  12. Tisza G, Markopoulos P. FunQ: measuring the fun experience of a learning activity with adolescents. Curr Psychol. 2023;42:1936–1956. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01484-2
  13. Karl K, Peluchette J, Hall-Indiana L, et al. Attitudes toward workplace fun: a three sector comparison. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2005;12(2):1–17. DOI: 10.1177/107179190501200201
  14. Lucardie D. The impact of fun and enjoyment on adult’s learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;142:439–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.696
  15. Karl KA, Peluchette JV. Does workplace fun buffer the impact of emotional exhaustion on job dissatisfaction? A study of health care workers. J Behav Appl Manag. 2006;7(2):128–142. DOI: 10.21818/001c.16553
  16. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  17. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(69). DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  18. Cooper S, Cant R, Kelly M, et al. An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(3):230–240. DOI: 10.1177/1054773819846024
  19. Covidence systematic review software. Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/.
  20. Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(1):145–172. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145
  21. Strean WB, Holt NL. Coaches’, athletes’, and parents’ perceptions of fun in youth sports: Assumptions about learning and implications for practice. Avante. 2000;6(3):83–98.
  22. Dismore H, Bailey R. Fun and enjoyment in physical education: young people’s attitudes. Res Pap Educ. 2011;26(4):499–516. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2010.484866
  23. Vieira LC, Corrêa da Silva FS. Assessment of fun in interactive systems: a survey. Cogn Syst Res. 2017;41:130–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.09.007
  24. Elton-Chalcraft S, Mills K. Measuring challenge, fun and sterility on a ‘phunometre’ scale: evaluating creative teaching and learning with children and their student teachers in the primary school. Education 3–13. 2013;43(5):482–497. DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2013.822904
  25. Fluegge ER. Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2008.
  26. Sim G, MacFarlane S, Read J. All work and no play: measuring fun, usability, and learning in software for children. Comput Educ. 2006;46(3):235–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.021
  27. Bolton SC, Houlihan M. Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement [Editorial]. Employee Relat. 2009;31(6):556–568. DOI: 10.1108/01425450910991721
  28. McDowell T. Fun at work: scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes. San Diego (CA): Alliant International University; 2004.
  29. Reis HT, O’Keefe SD, Lane RD. Fun is more fun when others are involved. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(6):547–557. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1221123
  30. Tews MJ, Michel JW, Bartlett A. The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2012;19(1):105–114. DOI: 10.1177/1548051811431828
  31. Bisson C, Luckner J. Fun in learning: the pedagogical role of fun in adventure education. J Exp Educ. 1996;19(2):108–112. DOI: 10.1177/105382599601900208
  32. Fu F-L, Su R-C, Yu S-C. EGameFlow: a scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Comput Educ. 2009;52(1):101–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
  33. Visek AJ, Achrati SM, Mannix H, et al. The fun integration theory: toward sustaining children and adolescents sport participation. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(3):424–433. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0180
  34. Kazen M, Kuhl J, Leicht EM. When the going gets tough…: Self-motivation is associated with invigoration and fun. Psychol Res. 2015;79(6):1064–1076. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0631-z
  35. Chu SL, Angello G, Saenz M, et al. Fun in making: understanding the experience of fun and learning through curriculum-based making in the elementary school classroom. Entertain Comput. 2017;18:31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.entcom.2016.08.007
  36. Ainley M, Ainley J. Student engagement with science in early adolescence: the contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011;36(1):4–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
  37. Plester B. Crossing the line: boundaries of workplace humour and fun. Employee Relat. 2009;31(6):584–599. DOI: 10.1108/01425450910991749
  38. Fleming P. Workers’ playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “Culture of Fun” program. J Appl Behav Sci. 2005;41(3):285–303. DOI: 10.1177/0021886305277033
  39. Tews MJ, Michel JW, Stafford K. Does fun pay? The impact of workplace fun on employee turnover and performance. Cornell Hosp Q. 2013;54(4):370–382. DOI: 10.1177/1938965513505355
  40. Pryor MG, Singleton LP, Taneja S, et al. Workplace fun and its correlates: a conceptual inquiry. Int J Manag. 2010;27(2):294–302.
  41. Chan SCH, Wan CLJ, Ko S. Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: the moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. Int J Manag Educ. 2019;17(1):94–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.004
  42. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737–1744. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
  43. Ford RC, McLaughlin FS, Newstrom JW. Questions and answers about fun at work. Hum Resour Plan. 2003;26(4):18–33.
  44. Karl KA, Peluchette JV, Harland L. Is fun for everyone? Personality differences in healthcare providers’ attitudes toward fun. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2007;29(4):409–447. DOI: 10.1177/107937390702900403
  45. Becker FW. The impact of fun in the workplace on experienced fun, work engagement, constituent attachment, and turnover among entry-level service employees. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University; 2012.
  46. Tews MJ, Michel J, Xu S, et al. Workplace fun matters … but what else? Employee Relat. 2015b;37(2):248–267. DOI: 10.1108/ER-10-2013-0152
  47. Lamm E, Meeks MD. Workplace fun: the moderating effects of generational differences. Employee Relat. 2009;31(6):613–631. DOI: 10.1108/01425450910991767
  48. Tews MJ, Michel JW, Allen DG. Fun and friends: the impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in a hospitality context. Hum Relat. 2014;67(8):923–946. DOI: 10.1177/0018726713508143
  49. Baid H, Lambert N. Enjoyable learning: the role of humour, games, and fun activities in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(6):548–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.11.007
  50. Yogman M, Garner A, Hutchinson J, et al. The Power of Play: A Pediatric Role in Enhancing Development in Young Children. Pediatrics. 2018;142(3). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-2058
  51. Read JC, MacFarlane SJ, Casey C. Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’s fun. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2002); 2002; Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  52. Karl KA, Harland LK, Peluchette JV, et al. Perceptions of service quality: what’s fun got to do with it? Health Mark Q. 2010;27(2):155–172. DOI: 10.1080/07359681003745097
  53. Hsbollah HM, Hassan H. Creating meaningful learning experiences with active, fun, and technology elements in the problem-based learning approach and its implications. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2022;19(1):147–181. DOI: 10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6
  54. Peluchette J, Karl KA. Attitudes toward incorporating fun into the health care workplace. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2005;24(3):268–275. DOI: 10.1097/00126450-200507000-00011
  55. Karl K, Peluchette J. How does workplace fun impact employee perceptions of customer service quality? J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2006;13(2):2–13. DOI: 10.1177/10717919070130020201
  56. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1990.
  57. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
  58. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109. DOI: 10.3102/00346543074001059
  59. Kahn WA. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Acad Manage J. 1990;33(4):692–724. DOI: 10.5465/256287
  60. Gamorna A, Nystrand M. Taking students seriously. In: Newmann FM, editor. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press; 1992. pp. 40–61.
  61. Hidi S, Renninger KA. The four-phase model of interest development. Educ Psychol. 2006;41(2):111–127. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  62. Managing Boundaries in Organizations: Multiple Perspectives. In: Paulsen N, Hernes T, editors. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2003.
  63. Krapp A. Interest and human development: an educational–psychological perspective. In: Smith L, Rogers C, Tomlinson P, editors. Dev Motiv, BJEP Monograph Series. Development and motivation: joint perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2003. pp. 57–84. DOI: 10.53841/bpsmono.2003.cat529.6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.3030 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 845 - 860
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 31, 2026
Published on: Sep 18, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Stephen K. Stacey, Kurt B. Angstman, Lauren P. Baker, Parivash Badar, Sara S. Oberhelman-Eaton, Rachel S. Wasson, Carol Goulet, Joshua P. Scheil, Heather N. Jett, David A. Cook, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.