Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reframing Validity: How Values Shape Assessment in Postgraduate Medical Education Cover

Reframing Validity: How Values Shape Assessment in Postgraduate Medical Education

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Messick S. Validity of Psychological Assessment. Am Psychol. Published online 1995;9.
  2. Norman GR, Van Der Vleuten CPM, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991;25(2):119–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00037.x
  3. Van Der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ. 1991;25(2):110–118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00036.x
  4. Kane MT. An argument-based approach to validity. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(3):527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.527
  5. Valentine N, Durning S, Shanahan EM, Schuwirth L. Fairness in human judgement in assessment: a hermeneutic literature review and conceptual framework. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(2):713–738. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-020-10002-1
  6. Marceau M, Gallagher F, Young M, St-Onge C. Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):641–653. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13574
  7. Young ME, Shankar S, St-Onge C. An exploration of values in medical school admissions processes: the interplay between contextual factors, admissions practices, and validity. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2024;29(4):1285–1308. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-023-10307-x
  8. Li S, Acai A, Sherbino J, Chan TM. The Teacher, the Assessor, and the Patient Protector: A Conceptual Model Describing How Context Interfaces With the Supervisory Roles of Academic Emergency Physicians. Coates WC, ed. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5(1):52–62. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10431
  9. Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model. Med Educ. 2011;45(10):1048–1060. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04025.x
  10. Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 2014;48(11):1055–1068. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12546
  11. Tavares W, Kuper A, Kulasegaram K, Whitehead C. The compatibility principle: on philosophies in the assessment of clinical competence. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(4):1003–1018. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09939-9
  12. Tavares W, Hodwitz K, Rowland P, et al. Implicit and inferred: on the philosophical positions informing assessment science. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(5):1597–1623. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10063-w
  13. Ginsburg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ, Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers encapsulate, words elaborate: toward the best use of comments for assessment and feedback on entrustment ratings. Acad Med. 2021;96(7S):S81–S86. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004089
  14. Gingerich A, Regehr G, Eva KW. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):S1–S7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6cf8
  15. Gingerich A. What if the’trust’in entrustable were a social judgement? Med Educ. 2015;49(8). DOI: 10.1111/medu.12772
  16. Poncelet A, Collins S, Fiore D, et al. Identifying value factors in institutional leaders’ perspectives on investing in health professions educators. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):e2256193. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.56193
  17. Acai A. Understanding Competence Committee Implementation and Decision-Making Practices in the Era of Competency-Based Medical Education. PhD Thesis. 2021. https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/26182 (Accessed November 29, 2025).
  18. Kaufman DM. Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. Underst Med Educ Evid Theory Pract. Published online 2018:37–69. DOI: 10.1002/9781119373780.ch4
  19. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Theory in medical education research: how do we get there? Med Educ. 2010;44(4):334–339. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03615.x
  20. Varpio L, Ellaway RH. Shaping our worldviews: a conversation about and of theory. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(1):339–345. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10033-2
  21. Kahlke R, Lee M, Eva KW. Building Blocks for Critical Reviews in Health Professions Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(2):186–189. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00155.1
  22. Kahlke R, Lee M, Eva KW. Critical reviews in health professions education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(2):180–185. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00154.1
  23. St-Onge C, Young M, Eva KW, et al. Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(4):853–867. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3
  24. St-Onge C. Evolving conceptualizations of validity: impact on the process and outcome of assessment? Published online 2015. https://usherbrooke.scholaris.ca/items/b87df0dd-159e-4a3f-afd5-0ddd5ee9a8c9 (Accessed November 13, 2025).
  25. Cook DA, Lineberry M. Consequences validity evidence: evaluating the impact of educational assessments. Acad Med. 2016;91(6):785–795. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001114
  26. Marceau M, St-Onge C, Gallagher F, Young M. Validity as a social imperative: users’ and leaders’ perceptions. Can Med Educ J. 2022;13(3):22–36. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73518
  27. Yeates P, Moult A, Cope N, et al. Measuring the effect of examiner variability in a multiple-circuit objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Acad Med. 2021;96(8):1189. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004028
  28. Holmboe ES. Realizing the Promise of Competency-Based Medical Education: Acad Med. 2015;90(4):411–413. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000515
  29. Chan T, Sebok-Syer S, Thoma B, Wise A, Sherbino J, Pusic M. Learning analytics in medical education assessment: the past, the present, and the future. AEM Educ Train. 2018;2(2):178–187. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10087
  30. Thoma B, Caretta-Weyer H, Schumacher DJ, et al. Becoming a deliberately developmental organization: Using competency based assessment data for organizational development. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):801–809. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925100
  31. Sargeant J, Mann K, Manos S, et al. R2C2 in Action: Testing an Evidence-Based Model to Facilitate Feedback and Coaching in Residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):165–170. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00398.1
  32. Norman G, Norcini J, Bordage G. Competency-based education: milestones or millstones? Journal of graduate medical education. 2014;6(1):1. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00445.1
  33. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. A history of assessment in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(5):1045–1056. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-020-10003-0
  34. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Med Educ. 2012;46(1):38–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x
  35. Okuyama A, Martowirono K, Bijnen B. Assessing the patient safety competencies of healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(11):991–1000. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000148
  36. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Brailovsky C, et al. Association Between Licensing Examination Scores and Resource Use and Quality of Care in Primary Care Practice. JAMA. 1998;280(11):989–996. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.11.989
  37. Wenghofer E, Klass D, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Doctor scores on national qualifying examinations predict quality of care in future practice. Med Educ. 2009;43(12):1166–1173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03534.x
  38. Asch DA, Nicholson S, Srinivas S, Herrin J, Epstein AJ. Evaluating obstetrical residency programs using patient outcomes. Jama. 2009;302(12):1277–1283. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1356
  39. Asch DA, Epstein A, Nicholson S. Evaluating medical training programs by the quality of care delivered by their alumni. Jama. 2007;298(9):1049–1051. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1049
  40. Sebok-Syer SS, Chahine S, Watling CJ, Goldszmidt M, Cristancho S, Lingard L. Considering the interdependence of clinical performance: implications for assessment and entrustment. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):970–980. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13588
  41. Ott MC, Pack R, Cristancho S, Chin M, Van Koughnett JA, Ott M. “The Most Crushing Thing”: Understanding Resident Assessment Burden in a Competency-Based Curriculum. J Grad Med Educ. 2022;14(5):583–592. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00050.1
  42. Van Melle E, Hall AK, Schumacher DJ, et al. Capturing outcomes of competency-based medical education: The call and the challenge. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):794–800. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925640
  43. Chan T, Oswald A, Hauer KE, et al. Diagnosing conflict: Conflicting data, interpersonal conflict, and conflicts of interest in clinical competency committees. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):765–773. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925101
  44. Ark TK, Brooks LR, Eva KW. Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Acad Med. 2006;81(4):405–409. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200604000-00017
  45. Bynum WE IV, Goodie JL. Shame, guilt, and the medical learner: ignored connections and why we should care. Med Educ. 2014;48(11):1045–1054. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12521
  46. Bynum WE IV, Varpio L, Lagoo J, Teunissen PW. ‘I’m unworthy of being in this space’: The origins of shame in medical students. Med Educ. 2021;55(2):185–197. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14354
  47. Sánchez NF, Poll-Hunter N, Spencer DJ, et al. Attracting Diverse Talent to Academia: Perspectives of Medical Students and Residents. J Career Dev. 2018;45(5):440–457. DOI: 10.1177/0894845317709997
  48. Dhaliwal G, Hauer KE. Excellence in medical training: developing talent—not sorting it. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(6):356–361. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-021-00678-5
  49. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee WD, et al. Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. Jama. 2002;288(23):3019–3026. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.23.3019
  50. Wenghofer EF, Williams AP, Klass DJ. Factors Affecting Physician Performance: Implications for Performance Improvement and Governance. Healthc Policy. 2009;5(2):e141–e160. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2013.21178
  51. Davies DJ, Sam AH, Murphy KG, Khan SA, Choe R, Cleland J. BMAT’s predictive validity for medical school performance: A retrospective cohort study. Med Educ. 2022;56(9):936–948. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14819
  52. Elks M, Lazzarini Z, Bradley C. How to Eliminate a Deficit-Centered Mindset About Medical Students of Color. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(12):975–980. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.975
  53. Chan TM, Sebok-Syer SS, Sampson C, Monteiro S. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) score: validity evidence for a scoring system aimed at rating short, workplace-based comments on trainee performance. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(3):319–329. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1708365
  54. Dijksterhuis MG, Schuwirth LW, Braat DD, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):e1396–e1402. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.756576
  55. Dannefer EF. Beyond assessment of learning toward assessment for learning: educating tomorrow’s physicians. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):560–563. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.787141
  56. Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, et al. Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2). Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1698–1706. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
  57. Greenberg CC, Ghousseini HN, Quamme SRP, et al. A statewide surgical coaching program provides opportunity for continuous professional development. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):868–873. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002341
  58. Development and Assessment of the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Rubric | Continuing Medical Education and Maintenance of Certification | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2764256 (Accessed December 3, 2022).
  59. Cooke LJ, Duncan D, Rivera L, Dowling SK, Symonds C, Armson H. How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8
  60. Cooke LJ, Duncan D, Rivera L, Dowling SK, Symonds C, Armson H. The Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework: a practical, evidence-informed approach for the design and implementation of socially constructed learning interventions using audit and group feedback. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):1–18. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0829-3
  61. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13645
  62. Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: Learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):564–568. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.789134
  63. Holland C. Critical review: medical students’ motivation after failure. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(3):695–710. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9643-8
  64. Kandasamy S, Vanstone M, Colvin E, Chan T, Sherbino J, Monteiro S. “I made a mistake!”: A narrative analysis of experienced physicians’ stories of preventable error. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021;27(2):236–245. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13531
  65. Bynum WE IV, Teunissen PW, Varpio L. In the “Shadow of Shame”: a phenomenological exploration of the nature of shame experiences in medical students. Acad Med. 2021;96(11S):S23–S30. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004261
  66. Bynum WE IV, Artino AR Jr, Uijtdehaage S, Webb AM, Varpio L. Sentinel emotional events: the nature, triggers, and effects of shame experiences in medical residents. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):85–93. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002479
  67. Acai A, Li SA, Sherbino J, Chan TM. Attending emergency physicians’ perceptions of a programmatic workplace-based assessment system: the McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP). Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):434–444. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1574581
  68. Li SA, Sherbino J, Chan TM. McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP) through the years: residents’ experience with an evolving feedback culture over a 3-year period. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(1):5–14. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10009
  69. Chou CL, Kalet A, Costa MJ, Cleland J, Winston K. Guidelines: The dos, don’ts and don’t knows of remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(6):322–338. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-019-00544-5
  70. Kalet A, Chou CL, Ellaway RH. To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(6):418–424. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0385-6
  71. Sklar D, Yilmaz Y, Chan TM. What the COVID-19 Pandemic Can Teach Health Professionals About Continuing Professional Development. Acad Med. 2021;96(10):1379–1382. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004245
  72. Thoma B, Monteiro S, Pardhan A, Waters H, Chan T. Replacing high-stakes summative examinations with graduated medical licensure in Canada. CMAJ. 2022;194(5):E168–E170. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.211816
  73. Susman J. Where medical education goes wrong. J Fam Pract. 2012;61(7):382–384.
  74. Curry RH, Meeks LM, Iezzoni LI. Beyond Technical Standards: A Competency-Based Framework for Access and Inclusion in Medical Education. Acad Med. 2020;95(12S):S109. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003686
  75. Flotte TR, Larkin AC, Fischer MA, et al. Accelerated graduation and the deployment of new physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med. 2020;95(10):1492–1494. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003540
  76. Alexander L, Ashcroft J, Byrne MH, Wan J. All hands on deck: early graduation of senior medical students in the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish. 2020;9:96. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2020.000096.1
  77. Birhane A, Kalluri P, Card D, Agnew W, Dotan R, Bao M. The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research. In: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency. ACM; 2022. pp. 173–184. DOI: 10.1145/3531146.3533083
  78. Monteiro SD. Capsule Commentary on Post et al., Rating the Quality of Entrustable Professional Activities: Content Validation and Associations with the Clinical Context. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2016;31(5):537–537. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3662-x
  79. van der Vleuten CPM. When I say … context specificity. Med Educ. 2014;48(3):234–235. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12263
  80. Kassam A, de Vries I, Zabar S, et al. The Next Era of Assessment Within Medical Education: Exploring Intersections of Context and Implementation. Perspect Med Educ. 13(1):496–506. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1128
  81. Sinz E, Banerjee A, Steadman R, et al. Reliability of simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians: performance is context-specific. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):207. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02617-8
  82. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Iobst WF, Holmboe ES. Reconceptualizing variable rater assessments as both an educational and clinical care problem. Acad Med. 2014;89(5). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000221
  83. Chan T, Li-Sauerwine S, Monteiro S, Ngo Q. Vigilance and validity: the necessity of assessment system surveillance to ensure equity in emergency medicine. Can J Emerg Med. Published online 2023:1–3. DOI: 10.32920/27931779.v1
  84. Hart SL. Axiology--Theory of Values. Philos Phenomenol Res. 1971;32(1):29–41. DOI: 10.2307/2105883
  85. Boer D, Fischer R. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude–value linkages. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(5):1113–1147. DOI: 10.1037/a0031347
  86. Arieli S, Sagiv L, Roccas S. Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations. Appl Psychol. 2020;69(2):230–275. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12181
  87. Van Schaik S, Plant J, O’Sullivan P. Promoting self-directed learning through portfolios in undergraduate medical education: The mentors’ perspective. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):139–144. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733832
  88. Strategies for Building Peer Surgical Coaching Relationships | Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2599169 (Accessed December 3, 2022).
  89. Smirnova A, Barone MA, Zabar S, Kalet A. Introducing the Next Era in Assessment. Perspect Med Educ. 2025;14(1):1–8. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1551
  90. Caretta-Weyer HA, Smirnova A, Barone MA, et al. The Next Era of Assessment: Building a Trustworthy Assessment System. Perspect Med Educ. 2024;13(1):12–23. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1110
  91. Kinnear B, Martini A, Varpio L, Driessen EW, Schumacher DJ. How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It’s a rhetorical question. Med Educ. 2024;58(8):989–997. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15311
  92. Pearce J, Chiavaroli NG. The line we draw: shifting epistemic regimes of standard setting in health professions education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. Published online May 6, 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-026-10542-y
  93. Ryan MS, Teunissen PW, Parsons AS, et al. Inside Their Minds: A Multi-Institutional Exploration into the Decision-Making of Medical School Competency Committee Members. Perspect Med Educ. 2026;15(1):53–64. DOI: 10.5334/pme.2361
  94. Ekpenyong A, Holmboe ES, Govaerts M, Heeneman S. Investigating the Roles and Impact of Clinical Competency Committees in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review. J Grad Med Educ. 2024;16(6):662–683. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00017.1
  95. Torre D, Schuwirth L. Programmatic assessment for learning: a programmatically designed assessment for the purpose of learning: AMEE Guide No. 174. Med Teach. 2025;47(6):918–933. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2409936
  96. Ramani S, Armson H, Hanmore T, et al. Could the R2C2 Feedback and Coaching Model Enhance Feedback Literacy Behaviors: A Qualitative Study Exploring Learner-Preceptor Feedback Conversations. Perspect Med Educ. 2025;14(1):9–19. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1368
  97. Ismaeel R, Riggs J, Ott M, et al. Assessment burden by design: exploring the variability in competence by design assessment forms. Can Med Educ J. Published online December 8, 2025. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.81428
  98. Ott MC, Dengler L, Hibbert K, Ott M. Fixing disconnects: exploring the emergence of principled adaptations in a competency-based curriculum. Med Educ. 2025;59(4):428–438. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15475
  99. Ismaeel R, Pusic L, Gottlieb M, Chan TM, Oyedokun TO, Thoma B. Bias in Observed Assessments in Medical Education: A Scoping Review. Acad Med. 2024;99(12):1438–1450. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005794
  100. Mangalindan KE, Wyatt TR, Brown KR, Shapiro M, Maggio LA. Investigating the Road to Equity: A Scoping Review of Solutions to Mitigate Implicit Bias in Assessment within Medical Education. Perspect Med Educ. 2025;14(1):92–106. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1716
  101. Desai SV, Burk-Rafel J, Lomis KD, et al. Precision Education: The Future of Lifelong Learning in Medicine. Acad Med. 2024;99(4S):S14–S20. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005601
  102. Preyra R, Mishra S, Khan H, et al. Exploring “Talent” in Medical Education: A Scoping Review. Perspect Med Educ. 2026;15(1):75–92. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1859
  103. Plastino E, Purdy M. Game changing value from artificial intelligence: eight strategies. Strategy Leadersh. Published online 2018. DOI: 10.1108/SL-11-2017-0106
  104. Morrison M, Lăzăroiu G. Cognitive Internet of Medical Things, big healthcare data analytics, and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic algorithms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Med Res. 2021;8(2):23–36. DOI: 10.22381/ajmr8220212
  105. Duan Y, Edwards JS, Dwivedi YK. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int J Inf Manag. 2019;48:63–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
  106. Carey R, Wilson G, Bandi V, et al. Developing a dashboard to meet the needs of residents in a competency-based training program: a design-based research project. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(6):e31. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.69682
  107. Yilmaz Y, Carey R, Chan TM, et al. Developing a dashboard for faculty development in competency-based training programs: a design-based research project. Can Med Educ J Rev Can Léducation Médicale. 2021;12(4):48–64. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.72067
  108. Thoma B, Bandi V, Carey R, et al. Developing a dashboard to meet Competence Committee needs: a design-based research project. Can Med Educ J. Published online January 7, 2020. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.68903
  109. Schoenherr JR, Hamstra SJ. Psychometrics and its discontents: An historical perspective on the discourse of the measurement tradition. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21:719–729. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9623-z
  110. Symonds PM. Factors influencing test reliability. J Educ Psychol. 1928;19(2):73–87. DOI: 10.1037/h0071867
  111. McConnell M, Sherbino J, Chan TM. Mind the gap: the prospects of missing data. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(5):708–712. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00142.1
  112. The Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Entering Residency. AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/medical-education/cbme/core-epas (Accessed July 10, 2024).
  113. Duran RP, Eisenhart MA, Erickson FD, et al. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association. Educ Res. 2006;35(6):33–40. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X035006033
  114. Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35(11);1012–1027. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.11.1012
  115. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press; 2015. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
  116. Pusic M, Pecaric M, Boutis K. How much practice is enough? Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):731–736. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182178c3c
  117. Pusic MV, Boutis K, Hatala R, Cook DA. Learning curves in health professions education. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1034–1042. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000681
  118. Chan TM, Dowling S, Tastad K, Chin A, Thoma B. Integrating training, practice, and reflection within a new model for Canadian medical licensure: A concept paper prepared for the Medical Council of Canada. Can Med Educ J Rev Can Léducation Médicale. 2022;13(4):68–81. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73717
  119. Cheung WJ, Bhanji F, Gofton W, et al. Design and Implementation of a National Program of Assessment Model – Integrating Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments in Canadian Specialist Postgraduate Medical Education. Perspect Med Educ. 13(1):44–55. DOI: 10.5334/pme.956
  120. Warm EJ, Kinnear B, Knopp MI, et al. Ambulatory Long Block: A Model of Precision Education and Assessment for Internal Medicine Residents. Acad Med. 2024;99(4S):S57–S63. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2818 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 830 - 844
Submitted on: May 22, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 19, 2026
Published on: Sep 16, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Sandra Monteiro, Matthew Sibbald, Matthew Lineberry, Teresa M. Chan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.