Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Dimensions of the Educational Alliance in Competency-Based Education. The figure depicts three interrelated layers: (center) the relational foundation of mutual trust and respect; (middle) shared goals and tasks that structure the collaborative educational process; and (outside) the contextual environment - including programmatic assessment systems, psychological safety and institutional culture - that shapes and is shaped by the alliance. The three layers of the figure symbolize reciprocal influence and feedback loops representing dialogue, reflection, and adaptive calibration across the layers.

Table 1

Key features of the educational alliance, alignment with the five core components of competency-based education, and the responsibilities of trainees and supervisors to promote a successful alliance for learning.

FEATURE OF THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCEEXPLANATION IN COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION PROGRAM, TIED TO CORE COMPONENTS [7]TRAINEE RESPONSIBILITY/ACTIONSUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITY/ACTION
Interpersonal Relationship
Mutual respectTailored learning experiences that facilitate the developmental acquisition of competencyContribute to a culture that encourages supervisors to provide honest and actionable feedback, and trainees to engage in feedback dialogues
Trust in formative feedback that is intended to enhance learning and skill building
Create a culture of trust and psychological safety
Foster cultural humility
Attention to professional identity formation
Goals of engagement
Shared purpose and goalsOutcome competenciesCo-production of learning goals aligned with the outcome competencies
Shared agreement on how trainees and supervisors will interactTailored learning experiences that facilitate the developmental acquisition of competencyShared agreement between supervisor and trainee to dedicate time for goal setting, direct observation, feedback, coaching
Mutual accountability for learning outcomesOutcome CompetenciesCollaborative goal setting to include iterative updates to individualized learning plans and a realistic timeline for achievement of competencies
Commitment to honest feedback and continuous improvementCompetency focused instruction to promote developmental acquisition of competencyEngage in self-reflective practice, seek and accept feedback, embrace a growth mindset rather than a performance mindsetCoaching methods to promote feedback, dialogue, and growth (R2C2 coaching [48])
Engage in relevant faculty development including coaching theory and methods
Encourage trainee to adopt a growth mindset, avoidance of a false growth mindset
Task orientation (how to pursue agreed-upon goals)
Shared identification of learning needs and opportunitiesOutcome CompetenciesCo-produce learning goals and individualized learning plans that include an action plan
Shared focus on feedbackCompetency focused instruction to promote developmental acquisition of competencyRecognize the value in self-reflective practice, seek and accept feedback, embrace a growth mindset rather than performance mindsetCoaching methods to promote feedback, dialogue, and growth (R2C2 coaching)
Seek peer feedback and faculty development opportunities to grow as a supervisor
Alignment on assessment methods and criteriaProgrammatic AssessmentSeek to understand the formative and summative criteria and assessments that inform competency-based advancementEnsure trainee understands the formative and summative criteria and assessments that inform competency-based advancement
Engagement in reflectionTailored learning experiences to facilitate the developmental acquisition of competencyRecognize the value of self-assessment informed by feedback and multi-source work-place based assessmentsReflect on the supervisor role in facilitating trainee self-assessment to promote growth
Encourage trainee to incorporate feedback and multi-source evaluations in their self-assessment along with reflective practice
Cultivation of trainee’s agency for self-directionCompetency-focused instruction informs teaching practices that promote the developmental acquisition of competencyCompare self-assessment with supervisor feedback
Iteratively update learning goals and individualized learning plan
Encourage trainee self-assessment with structured feedback conversations to inform progress
Chart

An Educational Agreement to foster the educational alliance between trainee and supervisor. This shared Agreement is centered on the three key features of the educational alliance: interpersonal relationship building, goals of engagement, and task orientation to achieve goals. Suggested goals are coupled with actionable “sentence starters” to facilitate trainee and supervisor dyads as they develop and strengthen their relationship through collaborative goal setting. This Agreement is a shared responsibility of both the educator and the learner. It is intended to be adapted to meet local needs and contexts. Trainees are defined as students, residents, fellows, or other learner(s) and supervisors are teachers, clinical teachers, faculty, or equivalent roles.

Supplemental File 1: Appendix

Types of Educational Alliances within a Competency-Based Health Professions Education Program across relevant contexts, roles, and settings.

TRAINEE – SUPERVISOR RELATIONSHIPCONTEXTPURPOSE OF INTERACTIONS
Trainee and direct clinical supervisorRegular (i.e., daily, weekly monthly) contact for finite period of clinical training assignment
  • Clinical supervision

  • Feedback based on direct observation

  • Focus on patient care tasks

Trainee and longitudinal coach, mentor, advisorOften an assigned relationship that may last throughout the entire program
  • Longitudinal, developmental support

  • Review of competency-based assessments and aggregate data

  • Assessment of progress within the program

  • Goal setting to achieve program outcome goals

Trainee and program directorOversight over trainees within the training program
  • Focus on the integrity of the program (preventing malpractice, fostering inclusion)

Trainee and clinical competency committeePeriodic, scheduled review of progress toward program competencies and milestones
  • Making and justifying high stakes entrustment decisions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2607 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 799 - 813
Submitted on: Mar 23, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 15, 2026
Published on: Sep 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Karen E. Hauer, Mary Ellen J. Goldhamer, Jonathan Amiel, Denyse Richardson, Alan Schwartz, Adrian P. Marty, Laura Molgaard, Severin Pinilla, Jan Breckwoldt, As members of the International Competency-Based Health Professions Educators Collaborative, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.