Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Patients’ Voices and the Assessment of Medical Trainees: A Discourse Analysis Cover

Patients’ Voices and the Assessment of Medical Trainees: A Discourse Analysis

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Nemir A, Pearson M, Kitchin V, Wilbur K. Real patient participation in workplace-based assessment of health professional trainees: a scoping review. Eval Health Prof. 2024;47:283295. DOI: 10.1177/01632787231180275
  2. Khalife R, Gupta M, Gonsalves C, et al. Patient involvement in assessment of postgraduate medical learners: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2022;56:602613. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14726
  3. Moreau K, Eady K, Jabbour M. Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study. Can Med Educ J. 2019;10:e84e102. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.56881
  4. Rietmeijer CB, Deves M, van Esch SC, et al. A phenomenological investigation of patients’ experiences during direct observation in residency: busting the myth of the fly on the wall. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:11911206. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10044-z
  5. Gordon M, Gupta S, Thornton D, et al. Patient/service user involvement in medical education: a best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58. Med Teach. 2020;42:416. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652731
  6. Suikkala A, Koskinen S, Leino-Kilpi H. Patients’ involvement in nursing students’ clinical education: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;84:4051. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.010
  7. Swanson DB, van der Vleuten CP. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art revisited. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:S17S25. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842916
  8. Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1437e1446. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634
  9. Khan KZ, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part II: organisation & administration. Med Teach. 2013;35:e14471463. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818635
  10. Doyle AJ, Sullivan C, O’Toole M, et al. Training simulated participants for role portrayal and feedback practices in communication skills training: a BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 86. Med Teach. 2024;46:162178. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2241621
  11. Bokken L, Linssen T, Scherpbier A, Van Der Vleuten C, Rethans J. Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of the literature. Med Educ. 2009;43:202210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03268.x
  12. Castonguay V, Lavoie P, Karazivan P, Morris J, Gagnon R. Perceptions of emergency medicine residents of multisource feedback: different, relevant, and useful information. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74:660669. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.019
  13. Reinders ME, Blankenstein AH, van Marwijk HW, et al. Development and feasibility of a patient feedback programme to improve consultation skills in general practice training. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:1219. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.016
  14. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:4449. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.44
  15. Mills S. Discourse. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2004. DOI: 10.4324/9780203487136
  16. Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Qualitative research: discourse analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:570572. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a879
  17. Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51:4050. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13124
  18. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:17531760. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315617444
  19. Jagadeesan R, Kalyan DN, Lee P, Stinnett S, Challa P. Use of a standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire to assess the quality of care provided by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:738743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.033
  20. Ju M, Berman AT, Hwang W-T, et al. Assessing interpersonal and communication skills in radiation oncology residents: a pilot standardized patient program. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:11291135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.007
  21. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J. Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents’ competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 2004;79:458463. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00017
  22. El-Haddad C, Damodaran A, McNeil HP, Hu W. A patient-centered approach to developing entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2017;92:800808. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001616
  23. Dine CJ, Ruffolo S, Lapin J, Shea JA, Kogan JR. Feasibility and validation of real-time patient evaluations of internal medicine interns’ communication and professionalism skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6:7177. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00173.1
  24. Garra G, Wackett A, Thode H. Feasibility and reliability of a multisource feedback tool for emergency medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:356360. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00173.1
  25. Mahoney D, Bogetz A, Hirsch A, et al. The challenges of multisource feedback: feasibility and acceptability of gathering patient feedback for pediatric residents. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19:555560. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.002
  26. Klessig J, Robbins AS, Wieland D, Rubenstein L. Evaluating humanistic attributes of internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:514521. DOI: 10.1007/BF02599551
  27. Naidoo S, Lopes S, Patterson F, Mead HM, MacLeod S. Can colleagues’, patients’ and supervisors’ assessments predict successful completion of postgraduate medical training? Med Educ. 2017;51:423431. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13128
  28. Newcomb A, Trickey AW, Lita E, Dort J. Evaluating surgical residents’ patient-centered communication skills: practical alternatives to the “apprenticeship model.” J Surg Educ. 2018;75:613621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.011
  29. Weaver MJ, Ow CL, Walker DJ, Degenhardt EF. A questionnaire for patients’ evaluations of their physicians’ humanistic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:135139. DOI: 10.1007/BF02599758
  30. Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang C-H. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:333342. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005
  31. Qu B, Zhao Y, Sun B. Assessment of resident physicians in professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills: a multisource feedback. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:228236. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.3353
  32. Stausmire JM, Cashen CP, Myerholtz L, Buderer N. Measuring general surgery residents’ communication skills from the patient’s perspective using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). J Surg Educ. 2015;72:108116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.021
  33. Wood J, Collins J, Burnside ES, et al. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills1. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:931939. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.016
  34. Claramita M, Majoor G. Comparison of communication skills in medical residents with and without undergraduate communication skills training as provided by the Faculty of Medicine of Gadjah Mada University. Educ Health Change Learn Pract. 2006;19:308320. DOI: 10.1080/13576280600937887
  35. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, et al. Evaluation of resident communication skills and professionalism: a matter of perspective? Pediatrics. 2006;118:13711379. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3214
  36. Byrd A, Iheagwara K, McMahon P, Bolton M, Roy M. Using multisource feedback to assess resident communication skills: adding a new dimension to milestone data. Ochsner J. 2020;20:255260. DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0054
  37. Henkin Y, Friedman M, Bouskila D, Kushnir D, Glick S. The use of patients as student evaluators. Med Teach. 1990;12:279289. DOI: 10.3109/01421599009006632
  38. Bogetz AL, Orlov N, Blankenburg R, et al. How residents learn from patient feedback: a multi-institutional qualitative study of pediatrics residents’ perspectives. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10:176184. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00447.1
  39. Greco M, Brownlea A, McGovern J. Impact of patient feedback on the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars: results of a longitudinal study. Med Educ. 2001;35:748756. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00976.x
  40. McKinley SK, Wojcik BM, Kochis M, et al. A pilot study of inpatient satisfaction rating of surgical resident care. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:e192e203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.007
  41. Stewart EA, Marzio DH-D, Guggenheim DE, et al. Resident scores on a patient satisfaction survey: evidence for maintenance of communication skills throughout residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:487489. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00047.1
  42. Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, Bialer PA, et al. A rigorous evaluation of an institutionally-based communication skills program for post-graduate oncology trainees. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:19241933. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.026
  43. Keister DM, Hansen SE, Dostal J. Teaching resident self-assessment through triangulation of faculty and patient feedback. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29:2530. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1246249
  44. Matthews DA, Sledge WH, Lieberman PB. Evaluation of intern performance by medical inpatients. Am J Med. 1987;83:938944. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90655-3
  45. Reinders ME, Blankenstein AH, Van Der Horst HE, et al. Does patient feedback improve the consultation skills of general practice trainees? A controlled trial. Med Educ. 2010;44:156164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03569.x
  46. Tamblyn R, Benaroya S, Snell L, et al. The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:146152. DOI: 10.1007/BF02600030
  47. Dijk SW, Duijzer EJ, Wienold M. Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e037217. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037217
  48. Rassbach CE, Bogetz AL, Orlov N, et al. The effect of faculty coaching on resident attitudes, confidence, and patient-rated communication: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19:186194. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.10.004
  49. O’Keefe M, Whitham J. Early identification of ‘at-risk’students by the parents of paediatric patients. Med Educ. 2005;39:958965. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02194.x
  50. Cope DW, Linn LS, Leake BD, Barrett PA. Modification of residents’ behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:394398. DOI: 10.1007/BF02596425
  51. Bogetz AL, Rassbach CE, Chan T, Blankenburg RL. Exploring the educational value of patient feedback: a qualitative analysis of pediatric residents’ perspectives. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17:48. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.020
  52. Thomas PA, Hellmann DB. Residents’ attitudes toward patient feedback. Acad Med. 1999;74:9091. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199902000-00004
  53. Malau-Aduli BS. Patient involvement in assessment: How useful is it? Med Educ. 2022;56:590592. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14802
  54. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Strategy for patient-oriented research: Patient engagement framework. https://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html (accessed 25 Feb 2025).
  55. Holmboe ES. Work-based assessment and co-production in postgraduate medical training. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34:Doc58. DOI: 10.3205/zma001135
  56. Ten Cate O. Entrustment decisions: bringing the patient into the assessment equation. Acad Med. 2017;92:736738. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001623
  57. Sebok-Syer SS, Gingerich A, Holmboe ES, et al. Distant and hidden figures: foregrounding patients in the development, content, and implementation of entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2021;96:S76S80. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004094
  58. Regan de Bere S, Nunn S. Towards a pedagogy for patient and public involvement in medical education. Med Educ. 2016;50:7992. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12880
  59. Eijkelboom M, De Kleijn R, Van Diemen W, et al. Patients as feedback providers: exploring medical students’ credibility judgments. Perspect Med Educ. 2023;12:129140. DOI: 10.5334/pme.842
  60. McMahon-Parkes K, Chapman L, James J. The views of patients, mentors and adult field nursing students on patients’ participation in student nurse assessment in practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;16:202208. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.08.007
  61. Gilligan C, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Essers G, et al. Assessment of communication skills in health professions education; Ottawa 2024 consensus statement. Med Teach. 2024;46:15931606. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2413021
  62. Sehlbach C, Bosveld MH, Romme S, et al. Challenges in engaging patients in feedback conversations for health care professionals’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2024;58:970979. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15313
  63. Carraccio C, Englander R, Holmboe ES, Kogan JR. Driving care quality: aligning trainee assessment and supervision through practical application of entrustable professional activities, competencies, and milestones. Acad Med. 2016;91:199203. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000985
  64. Pomey M-P, Flora L, Karazivan P, et al. Le « Montreal model » : enjeux du partenariat relationnel entre patients et professionnels de la santé. Sante Publique. 2015;1:4150. DOI: 10.3917/spub.150.0041
  65. Molloy E, Bearman M. Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: ‘intellectual candour’in health professions education. Med Educ. 2019;53:3241. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13649
  66. van de Walle – van de Geijn BFH, Joosten – ten Brinke D, Klaassen TPFM, van Tuijl AC, Fluit CRMG. Upward feedback in nursing: a matter of giving, taking and asking. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;45:102792. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102792
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2588 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 556 - 568
Submitted on: Mar 20, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 7, 2026
Published on: Jul 6, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Christina St-Onge, Isabelle Boulais, Linda Bergeron, Vincent Dion, Iris Le Sieur, Mélanie Marceau, Marie-Eve Poitras, Tim Dubé, Daniel J. Schumacher, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.