Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Why Controlling Teaching Persists in Medical Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective Cover

Why Controlling Teaching Persists in Medical Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Ryan RM, Duineveld JJ, Di Domenico SI, Ryan WS, Steward BA, Bradshaw EL. We Know This Much Is (Meta-Analytically) True: A Meta-Review of Meta-Analytic Findings Evaluating Self-Determination Theory. Psychol Bull. 2022;148(11–12):919–945. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000385
  2. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Mann KV, Custers E, ten Cate O. Have Motivation Theories Guided the Development and Reform of Medical Education Curricula? A Review of the Literature. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):735–743. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cc0e
  3. Orsini C, Binnie VI, Wilson SL. Determinants and outcomes of motivation in health professions education: a systematic review based on self-determination theory. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:19. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.19
  4. Neufeld A. Putting Self-Determination Theory Into Practice: A Practical Tool for Supporting Medical Learners’ Motivation. Clin Teach. 2025;22(4). DOI: 10.1111/tct.70140
  5. Baldwin CD, Craig MS, Garfunkel LC, Harris JP, Shone LP, Biondi E, Cellini MM, Varade WS. Autonomy-supportive medical education: let the force be within you! Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1468–1469. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826cdc3f. PMID: 23111259.
  6. Biondi EA, Varade WS, Garfunkel LC, et al. Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy: Can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide? Acad Med. 2015;90(4). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000522
  7. Crockett C, Joshi C, Rosenbaum M, Suneja M. Learning to drive: Resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1732-6
  8. Su YL, Reeve J. A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs Designed to Support Autonomy. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
  9. Neufeld A. Moving the Field Forward: Using Self-Determination Theory to Transform the Learning Environment in Medical Education. Teach Learn Med. 2024;36(5):654–659. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2235331
  10. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Ten Cate TJ. Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination Theory. Med Teach. Published online 2011. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896
  11. Hoffman BD. Using self-determination theory to improve residency training: learning to make omelets without breaking eggs. Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):408–410. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000523. PMID: 25340367.
  12. Neufeld A. Autonomy-Supportive Teaching in Medicine: From Motivational Theory to Educational Practice. MedEdPublish. 2021;10(1). DOI: 10.15694/mep.2021.000117.1
  13. Sawatsky AP, O’Brien BC, Hafferty FW. Autonomy and developing physicians: Reimagining supervision using self-determination theory. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):31–38. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14580
  14. Bartholomew KJ, Ntoumanis N, Ryan RM, Bosch JA, Thogersen-Ntoumani C. Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning: The Role of Interpersonal Control and Psychological Need Thwarting. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2011;37(11):1459–1473. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211413125
  15. Amoura C, Berjot S, Gillet N, Caruana S, Cohen J, Finez L. Autonomy-supportive and controlling styles of teaching: Opposite or distinct teaching styles? Swiss J Psychol. 2015;74(3). DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000156
  16. Haerens L, Vansteenkiste M, De Meester A, et al. Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: identifying the most optimal motivating style. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2018;23(1). DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2017.1346070
  17. Pelletier LG, Séguin-Lévesque C, Legault L. Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. J Educ Psychol. 2002;94(1). DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
  18. Steindl C, Jonas E, Sittenthaler S, Traut-Mattausch E, Greenberg J. Understanding Psychological Reactance. Z Psychol. 2015;223(4). DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
  19. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Vol 53; 1985. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  20. Reeve J, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In: Research on Sociocultural Influence on Motivation and Learning: Big Theories Revisited, Volume 4; 2004.
  21. Assor A, Kaplan H, Kanat-Maymon Y, Roth G. Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learn Instr. 2005;15(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
  22. Reeve J. Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: What It Is, How to Do It. In: Building Autonomous Learners. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7
  23. Reeve J. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educ Psychol. 2009;44(3). DOI: 10.1080/00461520903028990
  24. Reeve J, Vansteenkiste M, Assor A, et al. The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motiv Emot. Published online 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
  25. Orsini C, Imafuku R, Jennings B, Neufeld A, Tricio J, Kusurkar R. What influences clinical educators’ motivation to teach? A BEME systematic review and framework synthesis based on self-determination theory: BEME review No. 90. Med Teach. Published online 2024. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166
  26. Reeve J, Jang HR, Jang H. Personality-based antecedents of teachers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling motivating styles. Learn Individ Differ. 2018;62. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.001
  27. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. 1984.
  28. Neufeld A, Rigby CS. Autonomy vs. Independence: Implications for Resident & Faculty Engagement, Performance, and Well-being. HCA Healthc J Med. 2024;5(2):103–110. DOI: 10.36518/2689-0216.1780
  29. van der Goot W, Van Yperen N, Albers C, Jaarsma D, Duvivier R. Effects of (de)motivating supervision styles on junior doctors’ intrinsic motivation through basic psychological need frustration and satisfaction: an experimental vignette study. Adv Heal Sci Educ Theory Pr. 2024;30(2):401–426. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10344-0
  30. Reeve J, Cheon SH. Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychol Sport Exerc. Published online 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.001
  31. Cheon SH, Reeve J, Vansteenkiste M. When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teach Teach Educ. Published online 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004
  32. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69(11). DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199411000-00001
  33. Wear D, Skillicorn J. Hidden in plain sight: The formal, informal, and hidden curricula of a psychiatry clerkship. Acad Med. 2009;84(4). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a80b7
  34. Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2009;14(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
  35. Edmondson AC. The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Vol 1.; 2018.
  36. Malin G, Palmer A. Pressure to Perform: Canadian Student Perspectives of Pimping Through a Self-Determination Theory Lens. Teach Learn Med. Published online 2025. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2578464
  37. Boggiano AK, Flink C, Shields A, Seelbach A, Barrett M. Use of techniques promoting students’ self-determination: Effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motiv Emot. 1993;17(4):319–336. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992323
  38. Hafferty FW, Castellani B. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med. 2010;85(2). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c85b43
  39. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1). DOI: 10.1111/medu.13645
  40. Phaneuf JC, Sehlbach C, Gauvin-Morin A, Slimani O, Walsh C, Heeneman S. When using entrustable professional activities thwarts basic psychological needs: A case study of residents’ experience. Med Teach. Published online 2026. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2026.2649217
  41. Gianakos AL, Freischlag JA, Mercurio AM, et al. Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and the Fear of Retaliation During Surgical Residency Training: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2022;46(7). DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06432-6
  42. Riaz Q, Waterval D, Sehlbach C, Paulus A. Culture, power and practice: Critical discourse analysis of workplace-based assessments in hierarchical postgraduate medical education. Med Educ. Published online 2026:1–9. DOI: 10.1111/medu.70251
  43. Cheon SH, Reeve J, Yu TH, Jang HR. The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014;36(4). DOI: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0231
  44. McClintock AH, Fainstad T. Growth, Engagement, and Belonging in the Clinical Learning Environment: the Role of Psychological Safety and the Work Ahead. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(9). DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07493-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2417 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 861 - 870
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 18, 2026
Published on: Sep 24, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Adam Neufeld, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.