Elevating the University Teaching Qualification: From Ticking the Box to Actual Impact on Teaching

Felicitas Biwer; Lianne M. Loosveld; Boukje Compen

doi:10.5334/pme.2359

Elevating the University Teaching Qualification: From Ticking the Box to Actual Impact on Teaching

Perspectives on Medical Education

Volume 15 (2026): Issue 1

By: Felicitas Biwer , Lianne M. Loosveld and Boukje Compen

Open Access

|Jun 2026

Abstract

Background & Need for Innovation: At the medical faculty of a Dutch university, about 85 teachers annually participate in the University Teaching Qualification (UTQ) trajectory. Although the trajectory had long remained unchanged, evaluations showed that many joined primarily to obtain certification, with limited intrinsic motivation. The assessment portfolio was experienced as burdensome and insufficiently reflective.

Goal of Innovation: We aimed to redesign the UTQ trajectory to foster not only qualification but also sustainable professional growth, better aligned with teachers’ daily educational practice.

Steps taken for Development and Implementation of Innovation: The trajectory was revised iteratively. The portfolio gained a more integrated role as participants were encouraged to develop it continuously during and between sessions, supported by formative feedback. This differed from the previous approach, where participants often did not engage in reflection on their teaching until after the final session. Furthermore, coherence across sessions was strengthened, and links to participants’ own practices were enhanced through competency-based assignments and a personal project involving the (re)design of their own educational activity.

Outcomes of Innovation: Through questionnaires and interviews, participants (N = 83) reported gained knowledge and confidence and felt the trajectory was practically relevant. The integrated portfolio enhanced reflection and growth, while peer learning, microteaching, and frequent feedback supported continuous learning and innovation.

Critical Reflection on Process: The iterative redesign illustrated that innovation in faculty development can emerge through incremental, feedback-driven change. Evaluations from participants and facilitators guided adjustments to sequence, assignments, and support. Close collaboration between program designers and facilitators enabled rapid improvements.

References

Breznik K, Law KMY. What do mission statements reveal about the values of top universities in the world? Int J Organ Anal. 2019;27(5):1362–1375. DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1522
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Molenaar WM, Zanting A. Experiences with the implementation of a national teaching qualification in university medical centres and veterinary medicine in the Netherlands. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:43–46. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0159-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Schalkwyk S, Amaral E, Anakin M, Chen R, Dolmans D, Findyartini A, et al. Disentangling faculty development: A scoping review towards a rich description of the concept and its practice. Med Teach. 2024;47(8):1304–1325. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2429612
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Bruggen L, ten Cate O, Chen HC. Developing a novel 4-C framework to enhance participation in faculty development. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):371–379. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1742124
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lycke KH. Faculty development and issues in a Norwegian perspective. Int J Acad Dev. 1999;4(2):124–133. DOI: 10.1080/1360144990040207
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lindberg-Sand Å, Sonesson A. Compulsory higher education teacher raining in Sweden: Development of a national standards framework based on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Tert Educ Manag. 2008;14(2):123–139. DOI: 10.1080/13583880802053051
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Trowler P, Bamber R. Compulsory higher education teacher training: Joined-up policies, institutional architectures and enhancement cultures. Int J Acad Dev. 2005;10(2):79–93. DOI: 10.1080/13601440500281708
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Jong RAH, Mulder JA, Deneer PMH, van Keulen J. Poldering a teaching qualification system in Higher Education in the Netherlands: a typical Dutch phenomenon. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 2013;11:23–40. DOI: 10.4995/redu.2013.5517
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Association of Universities in the Netherlands. Professionalisation of university lecturers: The UTQ and beyond; 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brouwer N, Joling E, Kaper W. Effect of a person-centred, tailor-made, teaching practice-oriented training programme on continuous professional development of STEM lecturers. Teach Teach Educ. 2022;119. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103848
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schreurs M-L, Huveneers W, Dolmans D. Communities of teaching practice in the workplace: Evaluation of a faculty development programme. Med Teach. 2015;38(8):808–814. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112892
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dolmans DHJM. How theory and design based research can mature PBL practice and research. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2019;24:879–891. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09940-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steinert Y. Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice. Med Teach. 2010;32: 425–428. DOI: 10.3109/01421591003677897
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Molenda M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perf. Improv. 2015;42(5):34–36. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4930420508
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 1996;32:347–364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00138871
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dijk SW, Findyartini A, Cantillon P, Cilliers F, Caramori U, O’Sullivan P, et al. Developing a programmatic approach to faculty development and scholarship using the ASPIRE criteria: AMEE Guide No. 165. Med Teach. 2024;46(6):732–745. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2259062
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2009;21(5):5–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vreekamp M, Runhaar P, Gulikers J, den Brok P. Collaboration activities in pedagogical development programmes in higher education: what do teachers learn from this? High Educ Res Dev. 2025;44(5):1225–1241. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2025.2472840
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, Medicine. Clinician educator milestones; 2022. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/milestones/standalone/2022/clinicianeducatormilestones.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2359 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 475 - 481

Submitted on: Dec 18, 2025

Accepted on: May 11, 2026

Published on: Jun 5, 2026

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Felicitas Biwer, Lianne M. Loosveld, Boukje Compen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 15 (2026): Issue 1