References
- Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedbackxs. Medical education. 2010;44(1):101–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x
- Dai CM, Bertram K, Chahine S. Feedback credibility in healthcare education: a systematic review and synthesis. Medical Science Educator. 2021;31:923–33. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01167-w
- Ramani S, Post SE, Könings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teaching and learning in medicine. 2017;29(2):153–61. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014
- Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Medical education. 2012;46(2):192–200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04126.x
- Buckley C, Natesan S, Breslin A, Gottlieb M. Finessing feedback: recommendations for effective feedback in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2020;75(3):445–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.016
- Li SA, Sherbino J, Chan TM. McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP) through the years: residents’ experience with an evolving feedback culture over a 3-year period. AEM Education and Training. 2017;1(1):5–14. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10009
- Natesan S, Jordan J, Sheng A, Carmelli G, Barbas B, King A, et al. Feedback in Medical Education: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2023;24(3):
479 . DOI: 10.5811/WESTJEM.56544 - Georgoff PE, Shaughness G, Leininger L, Nikolian VC, Sandhu G, Reddy R, et al. Evaluating the performance of the Minute Feedback System: A web-based feedback tool for medical students. The American Journal of Surgery. 2018;215(2):293–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.047
- Tagle L, Shen M, Leininger L, Kim GJ. Flipping the feedback script: using a bottom-up feedback tool in surgical education. The American Journal of Surgery. 2021;222(6):1178–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.027
- Bahor Z, Liao J, Currie G, Ayder C, Macleod M, McCann SK, et al. Development and uptake of an online systematic review platform: the early years of the CAMARADES Systematic Review Facility (SyRF). BMJ Open Science. 2021;5(1). DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2020-100103
- Ratanjee-Vanmali H, Swanepoel DW, Laplante-Lévesque A. Patient uptake, experience, and satisfaction using web-based and face-to-face hearing health services: process evaluation study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(3):
e15875 . DOI: 10.2196/15875 - Zaidi S, Thursky K. Using formative evaluation to improve uptake of a web-based tool to support antimicrobial stewardship. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2013;38(6):490–7. DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12093
- Ajjawi R, Boud D. Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018;43(7):1106–19. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
- Hamza DM, Regehr G. Eco-normalization: Evaluating the longevity of an innovation in context. Academic Medicine. 2021;96(11S):S48–S53. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004318
- Saddawi-Konefka D, Sullivan A, Beltran C, Baker K. Doing More with written feedback: improving learner satisfaction and reflection with the LEAF (Learner-Engaged Analysis of Feedback) method. Academic Medicine. 2021;96(10):
1425 . DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004046 - Charmaz K.
Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods . In: Developing grounded theory. Routledge; 2016. pp. 127–93. - Miller DA. Methods for change: Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT). Methods for Change Volume 2: Impactful social science methodologies for 21st century problems. 2023:1–9.
- Charmaz K. Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology; 2017. DOI: 10.4135/9781526405555.n14
- Charmaz K. The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative inquiry. 2017;23(1):34–45. DOI: 10.1177/1077800416657105
- Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, et al. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence-and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine. 2015;90(12):1698–706. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
- Deci EL, Ryan RM, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. 1985:11–40. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2
- Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM.
Diffusion of innovations . In: An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Routledge; 2014. pp. 432–48. - Ryan RM, Kuhl J, Deci EL. Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and psychopathology. 1997;9(4):701–28. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579497001405
- Lyness JM, Lurie SJ, Ward DS, Mooney CJ, Lambert DR. Engaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicine. BMC medical education. 2013;13(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-151
- Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 2008;49(3):
182 . DOI: 10.1037/a0012801 - Watling C. When I say… learning culture. Medical Education. 2015;6(49):556–7. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12657
- Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Medical Education. 2013;47(8):842–50. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12235
- Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Medical education. 2013;47(6):585–94. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12150
- Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage; 2006.
- Watling CJ, Lingard L. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Medical Teacher. 2012;34(10):850–61. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.704439
- Bringer JD, Johnston LH, Brackenridge CH. Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software to develop a grounded theory project. Field methods. 2006;18(3):245–66. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X06287602
- Blair E, Zinkhan GM. Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2006;34(1):4–7. DOI: 10.1177/0092070305283778
- O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(2):190–7. DOI: 10.1177/1468794112446106
- Ramani S, Könings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CP. Meaningful feedback through a sociocultural lens. Medical Teacher. 2019;41(12):1342–52. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1656804
- Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical teacher. 2016;38(8):769–86. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
- Williams P.
Organisational culture: definitions, distinctions and functions . In: Handbook of research methods for organisational culture. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2022. pp. 5–22. DOI: 10.4337/9781788976268.00008 - Nassar AK, Reid S, Kahnamoui K, Tuma F, Waheed A, McConnell M. Burnout among academic clinicians as it correlates with workload and demographic variables. Behavioral Sciences. 2020;10(6):
94 . DOI: 10.3390/bs10060094 - Zetkulic M, Sargeant J. Who Pays the High Price of Failing to Integrate Evidence-Based Feedback Processes in Medical Education? Academic Medicine. 2024;99(8):
819 . DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005768 - Lip A, Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. What does “Timely” Mean to Residents? Challenging Feedback Assumptions in Postgraduate Education. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2023;12(1):
218 . DOI: 10.5334/pme.1052 - Risinamhodzi DT, Heymann R, editors. Lack of adoption of education technology on an instant student and lecturer feedback system. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);
2020 :IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125291 - Wood J. Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2022;47(3):327–46. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544
- Calderwood SJ. Surveillance Digitisation, Performativity, and Teacher-Student Relationships in a Blended Learning Setting. Postdigital Science and Education. 2025:1–25. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-024-00537-6
- Laufer M, Deacon B, Mende MA, Schäfer LO. Leading with trust: How university leaders can foster innovation with educational technology through organizational trust. Innovative Higher Education. 2025;50(1):303–27. DOI: 10.1007/s10755-024-09733-5
- Russell C. Academic freedom. Routledge; 2002. DOI: 10.4324/9780203003633
- Snow JL, Dismuke C, Carter H, Larson An, Holloway S. The emotional work of being a teacher educator and persisting through a pandemic. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2023;127:
104098 . DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104098 - Taxer JL, Becker-Kurz B, Frenzel AC. Do quality teacher–student relationships protect teachers from emotional exhaustion? The mediating role of enjoyment and anger. Social Psychology of Education. 2019;22(1):209–26. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-018-9468-4
- Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical education. 2014;48(7):713–23. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12407
- Long Z, Buzzanell PM, Anderson LB, Batra JC, Kokini K, Wilson RF.
Episodic, network, and intersectional perspectives: Taking a communicative stance on mentoring in the workplace . In: Communication yearbook 38. Routledge; 2014. pp. 387–422.