Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Organizational Justice and Perceived Organizational Support: Impact on Negative Work-Home Interference and Well-being Outcomes Cover

Organizational Justice and Perceived Organizational Support: Impact on Negative Work-Home Interference and Well-being Outcomes

Open Access
|Oct 2015

Figures & Tables

figures/Fig01_web.jpg
Figure 1

Hypothesized theoretical model.

Table 1

Fit indices for measurement models. Note. N = 509. Jppa = passive procedural justice; Jpac = active procedural justice; Jdis = distributive justice; Jinter = interpersonal justice; Jinfo = informational justice; χ2 = Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square; df = degrees of freedom; NNFI = Non-Normed Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation; Δχ2 = chi-square difference tests between the eleven-factor model and alternative models. ***p < .001.

Modelsχ2dfχ2 / dfNNFICFIRMSEAΔχ2 (Δdf)Model comparisons
111-factor model1071.14***4402.43.97.98.05––––
210-factor model : Jpac with Jppa1736.50***4503.86.94.95.08665.36(10)***1 VS 2
310-factor model : Jpac with Jdis2141.46***4504.76.93.94.091070.32(10)***1 VS 3
410-factor model : Jpac with Jinter2807.16***4506.24.91.92.101736.02(10)***1 VS 4
510-factor model : Jpac with Jinfo2273.44***4505.05.93.94.0101202.30(10)***1 VS 5
610-factor model : Jppa with Jdis1430.25***4503.18.96.97.07359.11(10)***1 VS 6
710-factor model : Jppa with Jinter1739.61***4503.86.95.96.08668.47(10)***1 VS 7
810-factor model : Jppa with Jinfo1568.36***4503.48.95.96.07497.22(10)***1 VS 8
910-factor model : Jdis with Jinter2658.59***4505.91.91.93.111587.45(10)***1 VS 9
1010-factor model : Jdis with Jinfo2015.60***4504.48.94.95.09944.46(10)***1 VS 10
1110-factor model : Jinter with Jinfo1259.75***4502.80.97.97.06188.61(10)***1 VS 11
Table 2

Descriptive statistics and inter-correlations among variables. Note. N = 509. POS = perceived organizational support; NegWHI = negative work-home interference. Correlations among variables are provided below the diagonal and Cronbach’s alphas are provided on the diagonal. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001. Absence of means and standard deviations for rhythm of work, age, presence of children between 6–12 years old, and overtime because the answers were beforehand categorized in the questionnaire.

VariablesMSD123456789101112131415161718
1Rhythm of work
2Age−.11*
3Number of children1.211.05−.28***.40***
4Children of 6–12 years old−.06.02.34***
5Organizational tenure12.909.19−.11*.78***.39***.12**
6Tenure in the department9.528.35−.04.60***.24***.05.76***
7Overtime.04−.02−.04−.04.08.05
8Active procedural justice 12.19.93.01−.03−.08−.07-.02−.13**−.04(.91)
9Passive procedural justice 12.84.71−.04−.07−.01−.13**-.08−.08−.10*.38***(.86)
10Distributive justice 12.65.78−.07−.07.02−.06-.07−.15**−.15***.43***.58***(.92)
11Interpersonal justice 13.40.73−.07−.06.07.02-.05−.09−.10*.25***.40***.35***(.92)
12Informational justice 13.06.71−.02−.05.00−.01-.05−.07−.16***.34***.48***.49***.78***(.90)
13POS12.56.64−.06−.05−.02−.03-.07−.14**−.16***.35***.45***.46***.43***.49***(.86)
14NegWHI21.01.60.14**−.06−.11**−.06-.01−.01.33***−.11*−.34***−.37***−.27***−.29***−.35***(.90)
15Job engagement32.80.48−.03−.05.01−.05-.10*−.07.01.10*.17***.07.20***.19***.25***−.13**(.78)
16Job strain31.80.52.06−.04−.14**−.07.02.04.21***−.15***−.30***−.32***−.28***−.29***−.31***.68***−.23***(.86)
17Job satisfaction13.52.90−.03−.05.06.02-.06−.07−.18***.20***.34***.33***.32***.36***.40***−.49***.47***−.56***(.89)
18Intention to quit12.16.98.05−.19***−.18***−.07-.15***−.07.20***−.13**−.21***−.23***−.28***−.29***−.33***.43***−.25***.45***−.57***(.91)

[i] 1 Ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

2 Ranges from 0 (never) to 3 (always).

3 Ranges from 1 (never) to 4 (always).

Table 3

Fit indices for structural models. Note. N = 509. Jppa = passive procedural justice; Jpac = active procedural justice; Jdis = distributive justice; Jinter = interpersonal justice; Jinfo = informational justice; POS = perceived organizational support; NegWHI = negative work-home interference; OJ = organizational justice; χ2 = Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square; df = degrees of freedom; NNFI = Non-Normed Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation. ***p < .001.

Modelsχ2dfχ2 / dfNNFICFIRMSEAΔχ2 (Δdf)Model comparisons
Model 1: theoretical model (with Jpac and Jppa separated)2427.426903.52.94.95.07
Model 2: Model 1 + Path between POS and job satisfaction2411.166893.50.94.95.0716.26(1)***Model 1 vs Model 2
Model 3: Model 2 + Path between POS and job engagement2399.336883.49.94.95.0711.83(1)***Model 2 vs Model 3
Model 4: Model 3 + Path between POS and intention to quit2372.306873.45.94.95.0727.03(1)***Model 3 vs Model 4
Model 5: Model 4 + Path between POS and job strain2368.666863.45.94.95.073.64(1)Model 4 vs Model 5
Model 6: Model 4 + Path between Jppa and NegWHI2360.216863.44.94.95.0712.09(1)***Model 4 vs Model 6
Model 7: Model 6 + Path between Jdis and NegWHI2346.996853.43.94.95.0713.22(1)***Model 6 vs Model 7
Model 8: Model 7 + Path between Jppac and NegWHI2344.086843.43.94.95.072.91(1)Model 7 vs Model 8
Model 9: Model 7 + Path between Jinter and NegWHI2345.486843.43.94.95.071.51(1)Model 7 vs Model 9
Model 10: Model 7 + Path between Jinfo and NegWHI2346.256843.43.94.95.07.74(1)Model 7 vs Model 10
figures/Fig02_web.jpg
Figure 2

Completely standardized path coefficients for the retained model (Model 7). For the sake of clarity, only structural relationships are shown. POS = perceived organizational support; NegWHI = negative work-home interference; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Table 4

Indirect pathways using bootstrapping (hypotheses 1 and 2). Note. N = 509. NegWHI = negative work-home interference; 10,000 bootstrap samples.

Indirect effect: x → m → yBootstrappingPercentile 95% CI
EffectSELowerUpper
Active procedural justice → Perceived organizational support → NegWHI−.0125.0058−.0274−.0036
Passive procedural justice → Perceived organizational support → NegWHI−.0225.0099−.0481−.0077
Distributive justice → Perceived organizational support → NegWHI−.0211.0097−.0453−.0065
Interpersonal justice → Perceived organizational support → NegWHI−.0155.0095−.0388−.0009
Informational justice → Perceived organizational support → NegWHI−.0263.0121−.0564−.0077
Perceived organizational support → NegWHI → Job engagement.0093.0070−.0019.0263
Perceived organizational support → NegWHI → Job strain−.0848.0256−.1375−.0374
Perceived organizational support → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0858.0280.0368.1477
Perceived organizational support à NegWHI à Intention to quit−.0782.0264−.1368−.0331
Table 5

Indirect pathways using bootstrapping (Ancillary analyses: double mediation). Note. N = 509. POS = perceived organizational support; NegWHI = negative work-home interference; SE = Standard Error; CI=Confidence Interval; 10,000 bootstrap samples.

Indirect effect: x → m1 → m2 → yBootstrappingPercentile 95% CI
EffectSELowerUpper
Active procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job engagement.0008.0007−.0001.0027
Active procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job strain−.0069.0033−.0153−.0019
Active procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0069.0034.0020.0162
Active procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Intention to quit−.0063.0032−.0151−.0018
Passive procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job engagement.0014.0011−.0001.0049
Passive procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job strain−.0124.0056−.0264−.0039
Passive procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0125.0058.0042.0276
Passive procedural justice → POS → NegWHI → Intention to quit−.0114.0055−.0269−.0036
Distributive justice → POS → NegWHI → Job engagement.0013.0011−.0001.0047
Distributive justice → POS → NegWHI → Job strain−.0117.0056−.0255−.0033
Distributive justice → POS → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0118.0058.0036.0271
Distributive justice → POS → NegWHI → Intention to quit−.0108.0054−.0248−.0030
Interpersonal justice → POS → NegWHI → Job engagement.0009.0009−.0001.0041
Interpersonal justice → POS → NegWHI → Job strain-.0085.0055−.0225−.0004
Interpersonal justice → POS → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0086.0056.0007.0236
Interpersonal justice → POS → NegWHI → Intention to quit−.0079.0051−.0217−.0003
Informational justice → POS → NegWHI → Job engagement.0016.0014−.0001.0059
Informational justice → POS → NegWHI → Job strain−.0145.0068−.0326−.0045
Informational justice → POS → NegWHI → Job satisfaction.0147.0070.0046.0340
Informational justice → POS → NegWHI → Intention to quit−.0134.0066−.0318−.0042
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bk | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Published on: Oct 7, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Audrey Babic, Florence Stinglhamber, Isabelle Hansez, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.