Table 1
Numbers of participants allocated in different load situations.
| Consistent–high load | Consistent– low load | Inconsistent– high load | Inconsistent–low load | No load | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6th grade | 22 | 19 | 25 | 23 | 26 | 115 |
| 4th grade | 25 | 23 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 118 |
| Total | 47 | 42 | 45 | 48 | 51 | 233 |
Figure 1
Flow chart of no-load condition.
Figure 2
Flow chart of consistent/high-load condition.
Figure 3
Flow chart of consistent/low-load condition.
Figure 4
Flow chart of inconsistent/high-load condition.
Figure 5
Flow chart of inconsistent/low-load condition.
Figure 6
Reaction time of strategy execution in different strategy use conditions and load situations. C–H: consistent-high load; C–L: consistent-low load; IC–H: inconsistent-high load; IC–L; inconsistent-low load; NO: no load.
Figure 7
Reaction time of strategy execution in different grades and load situations. C–H: consistent-high load; C–L: consistent-low load; IC–H: inconsistent-high load; IC–L; inconsistent-low load; NO: no load.
Figure 8
Adaptability of strategy choice in 4th and sixth- grade children under different load situations. C–H: consistent-high load; C–L: consistent-low load; IC–H: inconsistent-high load; IC–L; inconsistent-low load; NO: no load.