Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Moral Foundations Questionnaire and Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale: Assessing the Factorial Structure of the Dutch Translations Cover

Moral Foundations Questionnaire and Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale: Assessing the Factorial Structure of the Dutch Translations

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. 1Akhtar, N., Francis, L. J., Village, A., Sailer, A. B., Hasan, S. S., & McKenna, U. (2023). Testing the Moral Foundations Questionnaire within a Muslim society: a study among young adults in Pakistan. Journal of Religious Education, 71(1), 118. DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00195-z
  2. 2Andersen, M. L., Zuber, J. M., & Hill, B. D. (2015). Moral foundations theory: an exploratory study with accounting and other business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 525538. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2362-x
  3. 3Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2022). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. PsyArXiv Preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/q6c9r
  4. 4Atari, M., Lai, M. H. C., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries. Proc. R. Soc. B, 287, 20201201. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201
  5. 5Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238246. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  6. 6Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118619179
  7. 7Byrne, B. M. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155175. DOI: 10.1177/0022022102250225
  8. 8Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203807644
  9. 9Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456466. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
  10. 10Curry, O. S., Chesters, M. J., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
  11. 11Davis, D. E., Rice, K., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., DeBlaere, C., Worthington, E. L., & Choe, E. (2016). The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in Black samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, e23e30. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000056
  12. 12Davies, C. L., Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45(6), 431436. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000201
  13. 13Doğruyol, B., Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019). The five-factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non-WEIRD cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109547
  14. 14Du, J. (2019). Validation of the moral foundations questionnaire with three chinese ethnic groups. Social Behavior and Personality, 47, 111. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.8009
  15. 15Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. The Guilford Press.
  16. 16Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Herzliya series on personality and social psychology. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 1131). American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/13091-001
  17. 17Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2012). Moral Foundations Theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55130. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
  18. 18Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 10291046. DOI: 10.1037/a0015141
  19. 19Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366385. DOI: 10.1037/a0021847
  20. 20Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin Books, Ltd.
  21. 21Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98116. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
  22. 22Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus: Special Issue on Human Nature, 133, 5566. DOI: 10.1162/0011526042365555
  23. 23Harper, C. A., & Hogue, T. E. (2019). The role of intuitive moral foundations in Britain’s vote on EU membership. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(2), 90103. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2386
  24. 24Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021). Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 13031329. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12452
  25. 25Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 6183. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
  26. 26Horn, L.-T., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement equivalence in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117144. DOI: 10.1080/03610739208253916
  27. 27Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 155. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  28. 28Iurino, K., & Saucier, G. (2020). Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment, 27, 365372. DOI: 10.1177/1073191118817916
  29. 29Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PlosOne, 7(8), e42366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
  30. 30Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14(1), 623. DOI: 10.1037/a0014694
  31. 31Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (Fourth edition). The Guilford Press.
  32. 32Leitgöb, H., Eifler, S., & Weymeirsch, J. (2020). Ein Instrument zur Erfassung allgemeiner Moralvorstellungen (ALLMOR). Soziologische Forschungsberichte, 17. Katholische Universität, Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. http://www.ku.de/ggf/soziologie/eichstaetter-beitraege-zur-soziologie/
  33. 33Lubke, G. H., & Dolan, C. V. (2003). Can unequal residual variances across groups mask differences in residual means in the common factor model? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 175192. DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_1
  34. 34MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  35. 35MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  36. 36Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Pyschometrika, 58, 525543. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294825
  37. 37Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S69-S77. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294825
  38. 38Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2012). Measuring attitudes toward immigration in Europe. The cross-cultural validity of the ESS immigration scales. ASK. Research & Methods, 21, 529.
  39. 39Moreira, L. V., de Souza, M. L., & Guerra, V. M. (2019). Validity evidence of a Brazilian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 35. DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772e35513
  40. 40Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s Guide. Seventh Edition.
  41. 41Nilsson, A. (2023). Measurement invariance of Moral Foundations across population strata. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(2), 163173. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2074853
  42. 42Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 2832 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2074853
  43. 43Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.
  44. 44Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 7190. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  45. 45Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt, P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and Health, (pp. 119169). Routledge.
  46. 46Steiger, J. H. (2007), “Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling,” Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 89398. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
  47. 47Tamul, D., Elson, M., Ivory, J. D., Hotter, J. C., Lanier, M., Wolf, J., & Martinez-Carrillo, N. I. (2020). Moral Foundations’ methodological foundations: a systematic analysis of reliability in research using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/shcgv
  48. 48Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 110. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291170
  49. 49Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 470. DOI: 10.1177/109442810031002
  50. 50Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., Lek, K., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2015). Editorial: measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01064
  51. 51Vecina, M. L. (2014). The Five Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale in men in court-mandated treatment for violently abusing their partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 4651. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.021
  52. 52Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus (Second edition). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781119422730
  53. 53Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 126. DOI: 10.1177/014662168500900101
  54. 54Yalç;ındağ, B., Özkan, T., Cesur, S., Yilmaz, O., Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Biten, A. F., & Sunar, D. (2019). An investigation of moral foundations theory in Turkey using different measures. Current Psychology, 38, 440457. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4
  55. 55Yilmaz, O., Harma, M., Bahçekapili, H. G., & Cesur, S. (2016). Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149154. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090
  56. 56Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021). Remapping the foundations of morality: well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. PlosOne, 16(10), e0258910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258910
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1188 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 20, 2023
Published on: Jul 24, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Ann de Buck, Lieven J. R. Pauwels, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.