References
- 1Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2016). Retrieval practice can eliminate list-method directed forgetting. Memory and Cognition, 44, 15–23. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0539-x
- 2Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87, 659–701. DOI: 10.3102/0034654316689306
- 3Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L.,
III . (2017). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory, 25, 764–771. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579 - 4Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940–945. DOI: 10.1037/a0029199
- 5Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 264–269. DOI: 10.1037/a0021324
- 6Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2016). Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children. Developmental Science, 19, 992–998. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12340
- 7Aslan, A., Zellner, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2010). Working memory capacity predicts listwise directed forgetting in adults and children. Memory, 18, 442–450. DOI: 10.1080/09658211003742698
- 8Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., & Roediger, H. L.,
III . (2006). Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 21, 19–31. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.19 - 9Bäuml, K.-H. T., & Kliegl, O. (2013). The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 39–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.006
- 10Bertilsson, F., Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Stenlund, T., & Jonsson, B. (2017). The testing effect and its relation to working memory capacity and personality characteristics. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16, 241–259. DOI: 10.1891/1945-8959.16.3.241
- 11Brewer, G. A., & Unsworth, N. (2012). Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 407–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.009
- 12Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563–1569. DOI: 10.1037/a0017021
- 13Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D., Davis, S. D., & Szpunar, K. K. (2018). Testing potentiates new learning across a retention interval and a lag: A strategy change perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 83–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.007
- 14Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D. (2018). Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 1111–1146. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000166
- 15Cho, K. W., Neely, J. H., Crocco, S., & Vitrano, D. (2017). Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1211–1235. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1175485
- 16Coane, J. H. (2013). Retrieval practice and elaborative encoding benefit memory in younger and older adults. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 95–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.04.001
- 17Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196772
- 18Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005
- 19Delaney, P. F., & Sahakyan, L. (2007). Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1074–1082. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193479
- 20Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. DOI: 10.1177/1529100612453266
- 21Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Wordgen: A tool for word selection and non-word generation in Dutch, German, English, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 488–499. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195595
- 22Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- 23Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (in press). Retrieval-based learning in children. Current Directions in Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/0963721418806673
- 24Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
- 25Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 226–236. DOI: 10.1037/a0020919
- 26Garcia-Marques, L., Nunes, L. D., Marques, P., Carneiro, P., & Weinstein, Y. (2015). Adapting to test structure: Letting testing teach what to learn. Memory, 23, 365–380. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889166
- 27Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- 28Hogan, R. M., & Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562–567. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80029-4
- 29Izawa, C. (1971). The test trial potentiating model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 200–224. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(71)90012-5
- 30Karpicke, J. D. (2017).
Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress . In: J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487–514). Oxford: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9 - 31Karpicke, J. D., Blunt, J. R., & Smith, M. A. (2016). Retrieval-based learning: Positive effects of retrieval practice in elementary school children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 350. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00350
- 32Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L.,
III . (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479. DOI: 10.1080/09658210802647009 - 33Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, R. W. (2014).
Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account . In: B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 61, 237–284. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1 - 34Kliegl, O., Abel, M., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2018). A (preliminary) recipe for obtaining a testing effect in preschool children: Two critical ingredients. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1446. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01446
- 35Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002
- 36Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
- 37Lipowski, S. L., Pyc, M. A., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2014). Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children. Developmental Psychology, 50, 994–1000. DOI: 10.1037/a0035202
- 38McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L.,
III , McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222–243. DOI: 10.1037/a0017619 - 39Meyer, A. N., & Logan, J. M. (2013). Taking the testing effect beyond the college freshman: Benefits for lifelong learning. Psychology and Aging, 28, 142–147. DOI: 10.1037/a0030890
- 40Minear, M., Coane, J. H., Boland, S. C., Cooney, L. H., & Albat, M. (2018). The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1474–1486. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000486
- 41Moreira, B. F. T., Pinto, T. S. S., Starling, D. S. V., & Jaeger, A. (2019). Retrieval practice in classroom settings: a review of applied research. Frontiers in Education, 4, 5. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00005
- 42Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- 43Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süß, H. M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence--their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61
- 44Parsons, S., Kruijt, A., & Fox, E. (2018, April 5). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive behavioural measurements. Preprint on PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6ka9z
- 45Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2014). Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 286. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286
- 46Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2019). Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 34, 242–250. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000307
- 47Pastötter, B., Eberle, H., Aue, I., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2017). Retrieval practice fails to insulate episodic memories against interference after stroke. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1074. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01074
- 48Pastötter, B., Engel, M., & Frings, C. (2018). The forward effect of testing: Behavioral evidence for the reset-of-encoding hypothesis using serial position analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1197. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01197
- 49Pastötter, B., Kliegl, O., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2012). List-method directed forgetting: The forget cue improves both encoding and retrieval of postcue information. Memory & Cognition, 40, 861–873. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0206-4
- 50Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 37, 287–297. DOI: 10.1037/a0021801
- 51Pastötter, B., Tempel, T., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2017). Long-term memory updating: The reset-of-encoding hypothesis in list-method directed forgetting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2076. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02076
- 52Pastötter, B., Weber, J., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2013). Using testing to improve learning after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology, 27, 280–285. DOI: 10.1037/a0031797
- 53Roediger, H. L.,
III , & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 - 54Roediger, H. L.,
III , & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x - 55Roediger, H. L.,
III , & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x - 56Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. DOI: 10.1037/a0037559
- 57Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101. DOI: 10.2307/1412159
- 58Sumowski, J. F., Chiaravalloti, N., & Deluca, J. (2010). Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: Clinical application of the testing effect. Neuropsychology, 24, 267–272. DOI: 10.1037/a0017533
- 59Sumowski, J. F., Wood, H. G., Chiaravalloti, N., Wylie, G. R., Lengenfelder, J., & DeLuca, J. (2010). Retrieval practice: A simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16, 1147–1150. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617710001128
- 60Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Expectation of a final cumulative test enhances long-term retention. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1007–1013. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193473
- 61Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1392–1399. DOI: 10.1037/a0013082
- 62Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (2018). Feedback increases benefits but not costs of retrieval practice: Retrieval-induced forgetting is strength-independent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 636–642. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1450-9
- 63Tse, C. S., & Pu, X. (2012). The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 253–264. DOI: 10.1037/a0029190
- 64Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
- 65Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, A. J., et al. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 58–76. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
- 66Wahlheim. (2015). Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information. Memory & Cognition, 43, 27–38. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0455-5
- 67Wahlheim, C. N., Alexander, T. R., & Kane, M. J. (2019). Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 47, 619–642. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00893-w
- 68Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<;101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E
- 69Weinstein, Y., Gilmore, A. W., Szpunar, K. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2014). The role of test expectancy in the build-up of proactive interference in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1039–1048. DOI: 10.1037/a0036164
- 70Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Szpunar, K. K. (2011). Testing protects against proactive interference in face–name learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 183, 518–523. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x
- 71Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L. (2014). Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 10–16. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12093
- 72Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2011). The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1140–1147. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7
- 73Yang, C., Chew, S.-J., Sun, B., & Shanks, D. R. (2019). The forward effects of testing transfer to different domains of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 809–826. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000320
- 74Yang, C., Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: A review of the FTE. npj Science of Learning, 3, 8. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y