Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Visual Search Task Reveals Categorical Representation of Topological Spatial Relations Between Objects Cover

Visual Search Task Reveals Categorical Representation of Topological Spatial Relations Between Objects

Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

References

  1. Baker, N., & Elder, J. H. (2022). Deep learning models fail to capture the configural nature of human shape perception. Iscience, 25(9), 104913. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104913
  2. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. 10.1163/156856897X00357
  3. Burlinson, D. (2019). The role of symbol closure in visual encoding: From perception to visual analysis of synthetic and real-world data. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte].
  4. Burlinson, D., Subramanian, K., & Goolkasian, P. (2018). Open vs. closed shapes: New perceptual categories? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(1), 574–583. 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745086
  5. Cavanagh, P., Caplovitz, G. P., Lytchenko, T. K., Maechler, M. R., Tse, P. U., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2023). The Architecture of Object-Based Attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(5), 1643–1667. 10.3758/s13423-023-02281-7
  6. Chen, L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218(4573), 699–700. 10.1126/science.7134969
  7. Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12(4), 553–637. 10.1080/13506280444000256
  8. Chen, L. (2025). The Relationship between Cognition and Computation:” Global-first” Cognition versus Local-first Computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17970.
  9. Chen, Y. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). The perception of history: Seeing causal history in static shapes induces illusory motion perception. Psychological Science, 27(6), 923–930. 10.1177/0956797616628525
  10. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. 10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433
  11. Eidels, A., & Townsend, J. T. (2010). Systems factorial technology analysis of Pomerantz’s configural figures. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 215. 10.1167/5.8.215
  12. Elder, J. H. (2018). Shape from Contour: Computation and Representation. Annual Review of Vision Science, 4, 423–450. 10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034110
  13. Elder, J. H., Oleskiw, T. D., & Fruend, I. (2018). The role of global cues in the perceptual grouping of natural shapes. Journal of Vision, 18(12), 14. 10.1167/18.12.14
  14. Elder, J. H., & Zucker, S. W. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33(7), 981–991. 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90080-g
  15. Elder, J. H., & Zucker, S. W. (1994). A measure of closure. Vision Research, 34(24), 3361–3369. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90070-1
  16. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  17. Hafri, A., Bonner, M. F., Landau, B., & Firestone, C. (2024). A phone in a basket looks like a knife in a cup: Role-filler independence in visual processing. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 8, 766–794. 10.1162/opmi_a_00146
  18. Hafri, A., & Firestone, C. (2021). The perception of relations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 475–492. 10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.006
  19. Hafri, A., & Papeo, L. (2025). The past, present, and future of relation perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 51(5), 543–546. 10.1037/xhp0001310
  20. He, L., Zhang, J., Zhou, T., & Chen, L. (2009). Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 509–517. 10.3758/PBR.16.3.509
  21. He, L., Zhou, K., Zhou, T., He, S., & Chen, L. (2015). Topology-defined units in numerosity perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(41), E5647–E5655. 10.1073/pnas.1512408112
  22. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98(3), 352–376. 10.1037/0033-295x.98.3.352
  23. Kaiser, D., Quek, G. L., Cichy, R. M., & Peelen, M. V. (2019). Object vision in a structured world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 672–685. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.013
  24. Klein, F. (1893). A comparative review of recent researches in geometry. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 2(10), 215–249. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1893-00147-X
  25. Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C. B., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(4), 723–735. 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.723
  26. Lovett, A., & Forbus, K. (2009). Computing human-like qualitative topological relations via visual routines. Proceedings of the 23rd International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop.
  27. Lovett, A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2017). Topological relations between objects are categorically coded. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1408–1418. 10.1177/0956797617709814
  28. Papeo, L., Goupil, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2019). Visual search for people among people. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1483–1496. 10.1177/0956797619867295
  29. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. 10.1163/156856897x00366
  30. Pomerantz, J. R. (2003). Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 471–473. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.007
  31. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(4), 635–649. 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.635
  32. Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 422–435. 10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.422
  33. Sablé-Meyer, M., Ellis, K., Tenenbaum, J., & Dehaene, S. (2022). A language of thought for the mental representation of geometric shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 139, 101527. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101527
  34. Sablé-Meyer, M., Fagot, J., Caparos, S., van Kerkoerle, T., Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2021). Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(16), e2023123118. 10.1073/pnas.2023123118
  35. Song, J., Zhang, H., Zuo, Z., Zhou, T., & Zhuo, Y. (2025). Temporal order judgment reveals visual processing priorities for topological structure. Cognition, 263, 106203. 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106203
  36. Summerfield, C., Luyckx, F., & Sheahan, H. (2020). Structure learning and the posterior parietal cortex. Progress in Neurobiology, 184, 101717. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101717
  37. Wang, B., Zhou, T. G., Zhuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2007). Global topological dominance in the left hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 21014–21019. 10.1073/pnas.0709664104
  38. Wei, N., Zhou, T., Zhuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2021). Topological change induces an interference effect in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 21(10), 4. 10.1167/jov.21.10.4
  39. Wolfe, J. M. (2021). Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1060–1092. 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9
  40. Yang, Y. H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2020). Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search? Visual Cognition, 28(3), 218–238. 10.1080/13506285.2020.1779892
  41. Yousif, S. R., & Brannon, E. M. (2024). Intuitive network topology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(8), 2013–2027. 10.1037/xge0001606
  42. Yousif, S. R., & Brannon, E. M. (2025). Perceiving topological relations. Psychological Science, 36(2), 71–86. 10.1177/09567976241309615
  43. Yousif, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2019). The one-is-more illusion: Sets of discrete objects appear less extended than equivalent continuous entities in both space and time. Cognition, 185, 121–130. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.002
  44. Zhou, K., Luo, H., Zhou, T., Zhuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2010). Topological change disturbs object continuity in attentive tracking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50), 21920–21924. 10.1073/pnas.1010919108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.523 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 51
Submitted on: May 4, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2026
Published on: Oct 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jintao Song, Li Zheng, Zhentao Zuo, Tiangang Zhou, Yan Zhuo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.