Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Visual Search Task Reveals Categorical Representation of Topological Spatial Relations Between Objects Cover

Visual Search Task Reveals Categorical Representation of Topological Spatial Relations Between Objects

Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

Figures & tables

Figure 1

Stimulus Sets. Each row shows the stimuli of one experiment, and any two adjacent columns form a stimulus pair. Exp 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, and 2c: Pairs 1, 3, and 5 differed in relative distance, not in inside/outside relation or connectedness. Pairs 2 and 4 differed in topological properties (i.e., inside vs. outside, connected vs. unconnected). (i.e., Exp 1a: The small circles were white in the experiment, presented in gray for display reasons here). Exp 1c: The inside/outside topological category boundary was removed.

Figure 2

Experiment task flow. In the trial flow (target-absent trials), participants were expected to press the identical button as the visual stimuli in the four quadrants were the same. In the two trials on the right (target-present trials), participants were expected to press the different button as the stimulus in one quadrant differed from the rest: local geometric differences (all inside relations or all outside relations) and topological property differences (difference in inside/outside relations). The visual stimuli do not appear aligned in the square array due to the random jitter in the experiments.

Figure 3

Results from experiments. Exp 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b and 2c, panels a-f. (a) Exp 1a: A small white circle and a large black circle were adopted to test inside/outside relations. The small circles were white in the experiment, presented in gray for display reasons here. (b) Exp 1b: A closed circle and a bar were adopted to exclude the influence of occlusion in Exp 1a. (c) Exp 1c: The inside/outside topological category boundary was removed. (d) Exp 2a: Two bars were adopted to test connectivity defined by overlapping. (e) Exp2b: Two arc stimuli were adopted to test connectivity defined by touching. (f) Exp 2c: Two triangles were adopted to examine connectivity with a larger touching area. Exp 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, and 2c: Most participants showed a W-shape pattern between different conditions, with faster response times for topological differences (red dots) than for nontopological differences (blue dots). Exp 1c: Most participants showed a V-shape pattern between different conditions, and the response time increased with the distance between the two objects (blue dots). Each dot represents the results of one participant.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.523 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 51
Submitted on: May 4, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2026
Published on: Oct 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jintao Song, Li Zheng, Zhentao Zuo, Tiangang Zhou, Yan Zhuo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.