Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prediction During Within- and Cross-Language Phrase Comprehension: Evidence from Eye-Tracking Cover

Prediction During Within- and Cross-Language Phrase Comprehension: Evidence from Eye-Tracking

Open Access
|Sep 2026
Read online

References

  1. Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53(2), 285–311. 10.1353/lan.1977.0043
  2. Allan, K. (1978). Singularity and plurality in English noun phrases: A study in grammar and pragmatics. Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2016 Block 4. https://hdl.handle.net/1842/17129
  3. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
  4. Altmann, G. T., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
  5. Apfelbaum, K. S., Klein-Packard, J., & McMurray, B. (2021). The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 121, 104279. 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104279
  6. Bannon, J., Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2025). Is predicting during language processing worth it? Effects of cloze probability and semantic similarity on failed predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(1), 106–118. 10.1037/xlm0001347
  7. Barr, D. (n.d.). Clusterperm: Cluster-permutation tests for time-series data from factorial experiments (Version 0.1.0.9000) [R package]. GitHub. https://github.com/dalejbarr/clusterperm
  8. Barr, D. J. (2022, October 26). Reproducibly Analysing Visual-World Eyetracking Data. https://dalejbarr.github.io/vw-analysis/
  9. Chun, E., & Kaan, E. (2019). L2 Prediction during complex sentence processing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(2), 203–216. 10.1007/s41809-019-00038-0
  10. DeLong, K. A., & Kutas, M. (2020). Comprehending surprising sentences: sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(8), 1044–1063. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1708960
  11. Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2017). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930. 10.1017/S1366728916000547
  12. Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 641–655. 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6
  13. Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 1–20. 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90534-6
  14. Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1461–1469. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036756
  15. Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2015). How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(6), 768–780. 10.1080/23273798.2015.1016047
  16. Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2016). Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 213–219. 10.1017/S1366728915000486
  17. Grisoni, L., Boux, I. P., & Pulvermüller, F. (2024). Predictive brain activity shows congruent semantic specificity in language comprehension and production. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(12), e1723232023. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1723-23.2023
  18. Grisoni, L., Miller, T. M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). Neural correlates of semantic prediction and resolution in sentence processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(18), 4848–4858. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2800-16.2017
  19. Grisoni, L., Tomasello, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2021). Correlated brain indexes of semantic prediction and prediction error: Brain localization and category specificity. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1553–1568. 10.1093/cercor/bhaa308
  20. Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W. (2020). How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221–234. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1648840
  21. Huang, S., & Schiller, N. O. (2021). Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence regarding their representation and processing. Brain and Language, 214, 104889. 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104889
  22. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23–B32. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
  23. Huettig, F., Chen, J., Bowerman, M., & Majid, A. (2010). Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(1–2), 39–58. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1163/156853710X497167
  24. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
  25. Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017). On predicting form and meaning in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 635–652. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000315
  26. Kaan, E., & Grüter, T. (2021). Prediction in second language processing and learning: Advances and directions. In E. Kaan & T. Grüter (Eds.), Bilingual Processing and Acquisition: Vol. 12. Prediction in second language processing and learning (pp. 2–24). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bpa.12
  27. Kim, J., Wessel, J. R., & Hendrickson, K. (2023). Inhibition of lexical representations after violated semantic prediction. Cognition, 240, 105585. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105585
  28. Krautz, A. E., & Keuleers, E. (2022). LinguaPix database: A megastudy of picture-naming norms. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 941–954. 10.3758/s13428-021-01651-0
  29. Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 533–572. 10.1080/01690969308407587
  30. Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Rabagliati, H., & Pickering, M. J. (2021). The role of language production in making prediction during comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(12), 2193–2209. 10.1177/17470218211028438
  31. Lehrer, A. (1986). English classifier constructions. Lingua, 68(2–3), 109–148. 10.1016/0024-3841(86)90001-X
  32. Liao, C. H., & Chan, S. H. (2016). Direction matters: Event-related brain potentials reflect extra processing costs in switching from the dominant to the less dominant language. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 40, 79–97. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.004
  33. Martin, C. D., Branzi, F. M., & Bar, M. (2018). Prediction is Production: The missing link between language production and comprehension. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1079. 10.1038/s41598-018-19499-4
  34. Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
  35. McMurray, B. (2023). I’m not sure that curve means what you think it means: Toward a [more] realistic understanding of the role of eye-movement generation in the Visual World Paradigm. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 30(1), 102–146.
  36. Mitsugi, S. (2020). Generating prediction based on semantic categories in a second language: A case of numeral classifiers in Japanese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(3), 323–349. 10.1515/iral-2017-0118
  37. Momenian, M., Vaghefi, M., Sadeghi, H., Momtazi, S., & Meyer, L. (2024). Language prediction in monolingual and bilingual speakers: an EEG study. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 6818. 10.1038/s41598-024-57426-y
  38. Ness, T., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2018). Lexical inhibition due to failed prediction: Behavioral evidence and ERP correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1269–1285. 10.1037/xlm0000525
  39. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior research methods, 51(1), 195–203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  40. Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. 10.1037/bul0000158
  41. Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A. J., Van Rij, J., & Järvikivi, J. (2018). Visual world paradigm data: From preprocessing to nonlinear time-course analysis. In Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017: Proceedings of the 9th KES International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies (KES-IDT 2017)–Part II 9 (pp. 268–277). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-59424-8_25
  42. Roembke, T. C., & McMurray, B. (2016). Observational word learning: Beyond propose-but-verify and associative bean counting. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 105–127.
  43. Roembke, T. C., & McMurray, B. (2025). Unlearning Incorrect Associations in Word Learning: Evidence From Eye-Tracking. Cognitive Science, 49(6), e70077. 10.1111/cogs.70077
  44. Rommers, J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018). Lingering expectations: A pseudo-repetition effect for words previously expected but not presented. NeuroImage, 183, 263–272. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.023
  45. Ryskin, R., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2023). Prediction during language comprehension: what is next? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 27(11),1032–1052. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.003
  46. Sánchez-Meléndez, H. O., Hendrickson, K., Choo, Y., & Wessel, J. R. (2024). Lexical inhibition after semantic violations recruits a domain-general inhibitory control mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(1), 249–262. 10.1037/xge0001642
  47. Tong, J., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2025a). The influence of prediction on bilingual language production: evidence from semantic classifier congruency. Psychological Research, 89(6), 1–17. 10.1007/s00426-025-02204-2
  48. Tong, J., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2025b). Within-language and cross-languages prediction: evidence from semantic classifier congruency. International Journal of Bilingualism, Advance online publication. 10.1177/13670069251353414
  49. Wang, M., Chen, Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2019). Lexico-syntactic features are activated but not selected in bare noun production: Electrophysiological evidence from overt picture naming. Cortex, 116, 294–307. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.014
  50. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 1–14. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1
  51. Yin, H., & Pickering, M. J. (2026). Predicting words across languages depends on language context: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 146, 104701. 10.1016/j.jml.2025.104701
  52. Zhang, J.-J., & Liu, H.-Y. (2009). The lexical access of individual classifiers in language production and comprehension. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(7), 580–593. 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00580
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.518 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 47
Submitted on: Aug 13, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2026
Published on: Sep 21, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jing Tong, Tanja C. Roembke, Wolfgang Scharke, Iring Koch, Andrea M. Philipp, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.