Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Working Memory Capacity and Efficiency Processes to Understand Working Memory Training Outcomes in Primary School Children Cover

Exploring Working Memory Capacity and Efficiency Processes to Understand Working Memory Training Outcomes in Primary School Children

Open Access
|Feb 2024

Figures & Tables

joc-7-1-348-g1.png
Figure 1

Adaptive working memory training activities: Backwards Span Digits activity (A) and Following Instructions Objects activity (B) modified from Lau et al. (2023). Note, ISI = interstimulus interval.

joc-7-1-348-g2.png
Figure 2

Working memory measures used to calculate performance, maximum span and processing speed: Backwards Span – Digits version (A) and Letters version (B), Following Instructions – Objects version (C) and Letters version (D), and N-back (E), modified from Lau et al. (2023). Note. ISI = inter stimulus interval.

Table 1

Child Characteristics at Baseline.

WORKING MEMORY TRAINING GROUP (n = 52)ACTIVE CONTROL GROUP (n = 36)GROUP DIFFERENCE p
Age in years, mean (SD)9.43 (1.31)8.84 (1.07)0.02
Female sex, n (%)23 (44.20)16 (44.44)0.95
Primary caregiver highest level of education, n (%)0.70
      Completed high school2 (3.85)1 (2.78)
      University bachelor degree/diploma23 (44.23)16 (44.44)
      University postgraduate degree6 (11.54)7 (19.44)
      Not reported21 (40.39)12 (33.33)
Secondary caregiver highest level of education, n (%)0.50
      Did not complete high school0 (0.00)1 (2.78)
      Completed high school4 (6.35)1 (2.78)
      University bachelor degree/diploma19 (30.16)14 (38.89)
      University postgraduate degree12 (19.05)6 (16.67)
      Not reported28 (44.44)14 (38.89)
ADHD-RS-5 (raw score), mean (SD)19.25 (9.06)12.16 (10.96)0.36
Raven’s SPM (raw score), mean (SD)234.77 (9.11)30.53 (9.77)0.60

[i] Note: 1One child in the control had ratings of clinical concern for ADHD-RS-5 and 2one child in each group had scores of clinical concern for the Raven’s SPM. Regressions and Chi-square tests were used to test group differences at baseline. Analyses adjusted for baseline age when testing group differences in scores for ADHD-RS-5 and Raven’s SPM. Abbreviations: ADHD-RS-5, ADHD Rating Scale-5 Home Version (18 items of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms rated on a 4-point scale by caregivers of children 5–17 years yield a total score ranging 0–54 with higher scores indicate greater symptoms. Scores >93rd percentile indicate clinical concern). Raven’s SPM, Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (a measure of fluid intelligence for individuals 6.5–80 years comprising five sets of 12 puzzles where the individual must identify the missing piece with the total score ranging 0–60 with higher scores indicating better fluid intelligence. Scores <7th percentile indicate clinical concern).

Table 2

Working Memory Scores at Baseline, Immediately Post-Intervention and 6-months Post-Intervention.

WORKING MEMORY TRAINING GROUPACTIVE CONTROL GROUPpf2WORKING MEMORY TRAINING GROUPACTIVE CONTROL GROUPpf2WORKING MEMORY TRAINING GROUPACTIVE CONTROL GROUPpf2
BACKWARDS SPAN DIGITS, MEAN (SD)
BASELINEIMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Performance7.60 (3.08)6.62 (3.19)0.480.017.59 (4.20)6.51 (3.80)0.940.009.00 (4.63)8.03 (3.38)0.880.00
Maximum Span3.56 (0.85)3.24 (1.02)0.260.013.53 (1.14)3.20 (1.11)0.800.004.00 (1.44)3.60 (1.06)0.560.00
Basic Processing Speed1396.20 (368.87)1492.85 (618.72)0.980.001468.11 (479.21)1643.09 (473.68)0.500.011219.15 (323.48)1348.80 (331.11)0.520.01
Cognitive Processing Speed1672.74 (488.10)1450.39 (497.74)0.020.081906.80 (1534.72)1698.71 (886.39)0.710.001425.57 (439.33)1398.37 (342.74)0.490.01
BACKWARDS SPAN LETTERS, MEAN (SD)
BASELINEIMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Performance5.50 (2.44)5.00 (2.19)0.860.006.39 (3.30)5.66 (2.42)0.900.006.78 (2.83)5.91 (2.36)0.390.01
Maximum Span2.88 (0.81)2.72 (0.88)0.910.003.16 (1.12)2.97 (0.79)0.600.003.34 (0.82)3.06 (0.73)0.310.01
Basic Processing Speed1933.59 (634.04)1894.79 (515.96)0.250.021657.46 (499.58)1968.76 (614.34)0.120.031709.85 (561.23)1827.99 (472.22)0.920.00
Cognitive Processing Speed1871.48 (553.58)1872.35 (654.26)0.940.001812.67 (385.60)1833.66 (504.96)0.940.001703.80 (472.43)1594.43 (440.50)0.120.04
FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS OBJECTS, MEAN (SD)
BASELINEIMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Performance7.12 (2.19)5.72 (2.31)0.050.057.06 (2.42)5.80(2.32)0.150.037.44 (3.06)6.69 (2.45)0.750.00
Maximum Span2.33 (0.62)1.89 (0.58)0.010.082.37 (0.76)1.94 (0.68)0.090.042.48 (0.86)2.26 (0.70)0.690.00
Basic Processing Speed4820.88 (1445.40)5269.37 (1759.51)0.630.003478.83 (924.57)4222.04 (1422.01)0.030.063443.72 (984.84)3766.26 (1092.09)0.640.00
Cognitive Processing Speed3199.25 (933.99)4240.08 (1968.37)0.010.122713.86 (860.50)3044.82 (939.46)0.430.012696.12 (698.30)3045.40 (1265.15)0.250.02
FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS LETTERS, MEAN (SD)
BASELINEIMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Performance6.56 (1.41)5.66 (2.04)0.090.036.21 (2.13)5.71 (2.22)0.680.006.06 (2.08)5.66 (1.75)0.590.00
Maximum Span2.00 (0.34)1.83 (0.57)0.310.012.25 (0.64)1.86 (0.49)0.010.082.00 (0.61)1.97 (0.57)0.890.00
Basic Processing Speed3225.83 (1552.82)4111.80 (2748.91)0.200.023251.00 (1515.78)3598.16 (1623.54)0.790.002491.87 (845.85)2855.11 (984.83)0.370.01
Cognitive Processing Speed2662.68 (763.73)3636.20 (2199.47)0.090.082809.44 (1480.79)3023.95 (1353.23)0.870.002369.98 (755.84)2228.71 (513.51)0.250.03
N-BACK, MEAN (SD)
BASELINEIMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Performance13.19 (5.04)10.06 (5.55)0.060.0414.80 (4.11)11.50 (5.38)0.020.0716.10 (3.59)14.00 (4.34)0.080.04
Cognitive Processing Speed1332.78 (329.55)1425.74 (417.39)0.230.021330.68 (321.82)1408.47 (374.46)0.460.011223.22 (283.39)1341.29 (360.36)0.280.01

[i] Note: p Group difference p-value, f2 Cohen’s effect size (small = 0.02, medium = 0.15, large = 0.35). Regressions and Chi-square tests were used to test group differences in working memory measures. Analyses adjusted for baseline age when testing group differences in scores.

Table 3

Moderated Multiple Regression Results for Change in Working Memory Performance From Baseline to Immediately and 6-months Post-intervention Predicted by Change in Maximum Span, Basic Processing Speed or Cognitive Processing Speed, and an Interaction Between the Change Score and Group.

OUTCOME MEASURE/PREDICTORB [95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS]βSEf2B [95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS]βSEf2
MAXIMUM SPAN
IMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Maximum span change3.01*** [2.40, 3.63]0.840.311.242.34*** [1.85, 2.83]0.730.251.14
Change * Group0.06 [–0.71, 0.82]0.010.380.000.70* [0.13, 1.28]0.180.290.07
Backwards Span Letters
Maximum span change1.91*** [1.38, 2.43]0.720.260.671.87*** [1.14, 2.60]0.640.370.33
Change * Group0.36 [–0.24, 0.96]0.110.300.020.57 [–0.27, 1.41]0.160.420.02
Following Instructions Objects
Maximum span change2.46*** [1.87, 3.05]0.780.300.882.71*** [2.09, 3.33]0.750.310.95
Change * Group–0.37 [–1.08, 0.34]–0.090.360.010.35 [–0.44, 1.14]0.070.400.01
Following Instructions Letters
Maximum span change2.78*** [2.13, 3.43]0.810.330.952.12*** [1.50, 2.74]0.620.310.59
Change * Group–0.27 [–1.11, 0.58]–0.060.420.010.36 [–0.56, 1.27]0.070.460.01
BASIC PROCESSING SPEED
IMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Basic processing speed change<–0.001 [–0.002, <0.001]–0.130.000.01<0.001 [–0.001, 0.002]0.080.000.01
Change * Group<–0.001 [–0.002, 0.002]–0.010.000.00–0.002 [–0.006, <0.001]–0.190.000.03
Backwards Span Letters
Basic processing speed change<–0.001 [–0.002, <0.001]–0.160.000.01<–0.001 [–0.002, <0.001]–0.140.000.01
Change * Group<0.001 [–0.001, 0.002]0.100.000.00<0.001 [–0.001, 0.001]0.040.000.00
Following Instructions Objects
Basic processing speed change<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.030.000.00<–0.001 [<0.001, <0.001]–0.210.000.03
Change * Group<0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]0.100.000.01<0.001 [<0.001, <0.001]0.080.000.00
Following Instructions Letters
Basic processing speed change<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.010.000.00<–0.001 [0.00, 0.00]–0.050.000.00
Change * Group<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.140.000.02<–0.001* [–0.001, <0.001]–0.260.000.07
COGNITIVE PROCESSING SPEED
IMMEDIATELY POST–INTERVENTION6–MONTHS POST INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Group (training group)0.001* [<0.001, 0.003]0.680.000.12<0.001 [–0.004, 0.004]0.000.000.00
Change * Group–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.420.000.05<0.001 [–0.004, 0.005]0.060.000.00
Backwards Span Letters
Cognitive processing speed change<–0.001 [–0.002, 0.001]–0.060.000.000.002* [<0.001, 0.003]0.480.000.13
Change * Group<0.001 [–0.002, 0.002]0.090.000.00–0.001 [–0.003, <0.001]–0.380.000.09
Following Instructions Objects
Cognitive processing speed change<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.120.000.01<–0.001* [–0.001, <0.001]–0.350.000.19
Change * Group<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.260.000.08<–0.001 [–0.001, <0.001]–0.050.000.00
Following Instructions Letters
Cognitive processing speed change<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.240.000.04<0.001 [<0.001, <0.001]0.100.000.01
Change * Group<–0.001 [<–0.001, <0.001]–0.150.000.02<–0.001 [–0.002, <0.001]–0.330.000.13
N-Back
Cognitive processing speed change–0.001 [–0.003, <0.001]–0.160.000.01–0.001 [–0.003, <0.001]–0.200.000.02
Change * Group0.001 [–0.002, 0.004]0.110.000.01<0.001 [–0.002, 0.003]0.070.000.00

[i] Note: B unstandardised beta (negative value for an interaction indicates the training group had a lower score), SE standard error of the estimate, β standardised beta, f2 Cohen’s effect size (small = 0.02, medium = 0.15, large = 0.35), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005. To apply Bonferroni corrections, significance levels of p = .004 (adjusting for 13 tests at each time-point) were calculated. Italics indicate non-significance after the Bonferroni correction was applied.

Table 4

Multiple Regression Results for Working Memory Performance, Capacity (Maximum Span) and Efficiency (Basic and Cognitive Processing Speeds) Scores Immediately and 6-months Post-intervention Predicted by Group, Covarying for Baseline Score and Age.

OUTCOME MEASURE/PREDICTORB [95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS]βSEf2B [95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS]βSEf2
PERFORMANCE
IMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Group (training group)–0.18 [–1.44, 1.08]–0.020.630.00–0.02 [–1.67, 1.63]0.000.830.00
Backwards Span Letters
Group (training group)–0.11 [–1.13, 0.91]–0.020.510.000.51 [–0.52, 1.55]0.090.520.01
Following Instructions Objects
Group (training group)0.42 [–0.48, 1.31]0.080.450.010.02 [–1.18, 1.23]0.000.610.00
Following Instructions Letters
Group (training group)0.01 [–0.94, 0.96]0.000.480.000.13 [–0.73, 1.00]0.030.430.00
N-Back
Group (training group)1.64 [–0.03, 3.32]0.170.840.051.14 [–0.55, 2.83]0.140.850.02
MAXIMUM SPAN
IMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Group (training group)–0.06 [–0.42, 0.30]–0.030.640.000.08 [–0.44, 0.61]0.030.260.00
Backwards Span Letters
Group (training group)–0.10 [–0.45, 0.25]–0.050.630.000.19 [–0.13, 0.50]0.120.160.02
Following Instructions Objects
Group (training group)0.19 [–0.10, 0.47]0.120.490.02–0.01 [–0.36, 0.34]–0.010.170.00
Following Instructions Letters
Group (training group)0.30* [ 0.04, 0.56]0.250.470.07–0.01 [–0.27, 0.25]–0.010.130.00
BASIC PROCESSING SPEED
IMMEDIATELY POST-INTERVENTION6-MONTHS POST-INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Group (training group)–65.08 [–252.30, 122.13]–0.07452.620.01–41.83 [–171.06, 87.39]–0.0664.920.01
Backwards Span Letters
Group (training group)–226.04* [–434.11, –17.96]–0.20477.610.069.70 [–195.00, 214.41]0.01102.840.00
Following Instructions Objects
Group (training group)–540.01* [–1039.64, –40.39]–0.22250.960.06–88.06 [–512.35, 336.23]–0.04213.160.00
Following Instructions Letters
Group (training group)107.11 [–540.03, 754.24]0.03324.990.00–99.75 [–461.82, 262.33]–0.05181.870.00
COGNITIVE PROCESSING SPEED
IMMEDIATELY POST–INTERVENTION6–MONTHS POST INTERVENTION
Backwards Span Digits
Group (training group)–91.20 [–1014.85, 832.46]–0.03458.590.00–30.22 [–275.03, 214.59]–0.04121.760.00
Backwards Span Letters
Group (training group)55.94 [–252.27, 364.15]0.06151.970.00218.41 [ –68.72, 505.55]0.24141.840.06
Following Instructions Objects
Group (training group)–285.76 [–955.32, 383.80]–0.15328.710.02–415.22 [–1132.04, 301.59]–0.19354.670.03
Following Instructions Letters
Group (training group)901.38 [ –506.28, 2309.03]0.26683.480.07237.42 [–217.56, 692.39]0.21219.940.05
N-Back
Group (training group)–41.20 [–191.82, 109.42]–0.0675.670.00–59.47 [–192.70, 73.77]–0.0966.960.01

[i] Note: B unstandardised beta (negative value for an interaction indicates the training group had a lower score), SE standard error of the estimate, β standardised beta, f2 Cohen’s effect size (small = 0.02, medium = 0.15, large = 0.35), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005. To apply Bonferroni corrections, significance levels of p = .003 (adjusting for 18 tests at each time-point) were calculated. Italics indicate non-significance after the Bonferroni correction was applied.

joc-7-1-348-g3.png
Figure 3

Mean highest span level trained on (and 95% CIs) for each training session in the adaptive working memory training group: Backwards Span Digits activity (A) and Following Instructions Objects activity (B).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.348 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jan 17, 2024
|
Published on: Feb 8, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Alexandra S. L. Tan, Regine C. Lau, Peter J. Anderson, Susan Gathercole, Mark A. Bellgrove, Joshua F. Wiley, Megan M. Spencer-Smith, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.