References
- Albers, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. Journal of experimental social psychology, 74, 187–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004
- Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2019). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious Mixed Models. ArXiv:1506.04967 [Stat].
http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967 - Baylor, C., Hula, W., Donovan, N. J., Doyle, P. J., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. (2011). An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 243–259. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0079)
- Betts, H. N. (2018).
Retuning lexical-semantic representations on the basis of recent experience [Doctoral, UCL (University College London)] . In Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London). (pp. 1–232).https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10049908/ - Bishop, D. V. (1983).
Test for reception of grammar . Published by the author and available from Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester, M13 9PL. - Blott, L. M., Hartopp, O., Nation, K., & Rodd, J. M. (2022). Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: Evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives. PeerJ, 10,
e14070 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14070 - Blott, L. M., Rodd, J. M., Ferreira, F., & Warren, J. E. (2020). Recovery from misinterpretations during online sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000936
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.16, retrieved 06 June 2020 from
https://www.praat.org . - Brock, J., Sukenik, N., & Friedmann, N. (2017). Individual differences in autistic children’s homograph reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Autism & developmental language impairments, 2, 2396941517714945. DOI: 10.1177/2396941517714945
- Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of cognition, 1(1). DOI: 10.5334/joc.10
- Byers-Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C., & Savalei, V. (2022). Six solutions for more reliable infant research. Infant and Child Development, 31(5),
e2296 . DOI: 10.1002/icd.2296 - Cave, C. B. (1997). Very Long-Lasting Priming in Picture Naming. Psychological Science, 8(4), 322–325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00446.x
- Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
- Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65–70. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90026-3
- Dagerman, K. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Harm, M. W. (2006). Aging and the use of context in ambiguity resolution: Complex changes from simple slowing. Cognitive Science, 30(2), 311–345. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_46
- Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 561. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.561
- Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological science in the public interest, 11(2), 53–79. DOI: 10.1177/1529100610387081
- Der, G., Batty, G. D., & Deary, I. J. (2009). The association between IQ in adolescence and a range of health outcomes at 40 in the 1979 US National Longitudinal Study of Youth. Intelligence, 37(6), 573–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.12.002
- Dolean, D. D., Lervåg, A., Visu-Petra, L., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2021). Language skills, and not executive functions, predict the development of reading comprehension of early readers: Evidence from an orthographically transparent language. Reading and Writing, 34(6), 1491–1512. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10107-4
- Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. Acta psychologica, 30, 412–431. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1
- Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 429–446. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90066-6
- Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: The current state of the literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 13–37. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7
- Egan, J. P. (1975). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. Academic Press.
- Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2006).
Structural Equation Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data . In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 283–299). American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/11383-020 - Engelhardt, P. E., Nigg, J. T., & Ferreira, F. (2017). Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An individual differences investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1263–1281. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785
- Enkavi, A. Z., Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Mazza, G. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5472–5477. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818430116
- Evans, W. S., Caplan, D., Ostrowski, A., Michaud, J., Guarino, A. J., & Waters, G. (2015). Working memory and the revision of syntactic and discourse ambiguities. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 69(1), 136. DOI: 10.1037/cep0000037
- Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133–141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00274.x
- Forbach, G. B., Stanners, R. F., & Hochhaus, L. (1974). Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 2(2), 337–339. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209005
- Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
- Foss, D. J., Bever, T. G., & Silver, M. (1968). The comprehension and verification of ambiguous sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 4(5), 304–306. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210520
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less Skilled Readers Have Less Efficient Suppression Mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4(5), 294–298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00567.x
- Gernsbacher, M. A., Robertson, R. R. W., & Werner, N. K. (2001).
The costs and benefits of meaning . In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 119–137). American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10459-007 - Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 430. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.430
- Gilbert, R. A., & Rodd, J. M. (2022). Dominance Norms and Data for Spoken Ambiguous Words in British English. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 4. DOI: 10.5334/joc.194
- Goh, S. K. Y., Griffiths, S., Norbury, C. F., & the SCALES Team. (2021). Sources of variability in the prospective relation of language to social, emotional, and behavior problem symptoms: Implications for developmental language disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(6), 676–689. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000691
- Goodhew, S. C., & Edwards, M. (2019). Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.008
- Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
- Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
- Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley.
- Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). Simr: an R package for power analysis of generalised linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = simr. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12504 - Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- Holmboe, K. (2022). We need to talk about validity—A commentary on ‘Six solutions for more reliable infant research’ from the viewpoint of an early executive functions researcher. Infant and Child Development, 31(5),
e2352 . DOI: 10.1002/icd.2352 - Hopkins, K. A., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1995). Scope of word meaning activation during sentence processing by young and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 21(2), 123–142. DOI: 10.1080/03610739508254273
- Johnson, C. J., Beitchman, J. H., & Brownlie, E. B. (2010). Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: Family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(1), 51–65. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0083)
- Kadem, M., Herrmann, B., Rodd, J. M., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2020). Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation. Trends in Hearing, 24. DOI: 10.1177/2331216520964068
- Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. (2004). Eye-fixation patterns of high-and low-span young and older adults: down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 157. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.157
- Khanna, M. M., & Boland, J. E. (2010). Children’s use of language context in lexical ambiguity resolution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 160–193. DOI: 10.1080/17470210902866664
- Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006
- Kliegl, R., Wei, P., Dambacher, M., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. (2011). Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238
- Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. DOI: 10.1007/BF02288391
- Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
- Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
- Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., Swaab, T. Y., & Gordon, P. C. (2006). Reading Words in Discourse: The Modulation of Lexical Priming Effects by Message-Level Context. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5(3), 107–127. DOI: 10.1177/1534582306289573
- Lee, C.-L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms: Differential age effects. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 960–972. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01158.x
- Lenth, R. V. (2021).
Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R Package Emmeans Version 1.6. 0] . Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). - Little, T. D. (2013).
Longitudinal structural equation modeling . Guilford press. - Lord, F. M. (1963).
Elementary models for measuring change . In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press. - MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive psychology, 24(1), 56–98. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K
- MacGregor, L. J., Rodd, J. M., Gilbert, R. A., Hauk, O., Sohoglu, E., & Davis, M. H. (2020). The neural time course of semantic ambiguity resolution in speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(3), 403–425. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01493
- Maciejewski, G., Rodd, J. M., Mon-Williams, M., & Klepousniotou, E. (2020). The cost of learning new meanings for familiar words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 188–210. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1642500
- Malyutina, S., & den Ouden, D. B. (2016). What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis) interpretations in younger and older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 880–906. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1045530
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 741–760. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8
- McNeish, D., Dumas, D. G., & Grimm, K. J. (2020). Estimating new quantities from longitudinal test scores to improve forecasts of future performance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(6), 894–909. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1691484
- Miguel-Abella, R. S., Pérez-Sánchez, M. Á., Cuetos, F., Marín, J., & González-Nosti, M. (2022). SpaVerb-WN—A megastudy of naming times for 4562 Spanish verbs: Effects of psycholinguistic and motor content variables. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2640–2664. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01734-y
- Milne, A. E., Bianco, R., Poole, K. C., Zhao, S., Oxenham, A. J., Billig, A. J., & Chait, M. (2021). An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1551–1562. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0
- Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Individual Differences in Contextual Facilitation: Evidence from Dyslexia and Poor Reading Comprehension. Child Development, 69(4), 996–1011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06157.x
- Norbury, C. F. (2005). Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(2), 142–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.003
- Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1993). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(2), 251–271. DOI: 10.1007/BF01067833
- Parsons, S. (2021). splithalf: Robust estimates of split half reliability. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3041. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03041
- Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/2515245919879695
- Ratcliff, R., & Childers, R. (2015). Individual differences and fitting methods for the two-choice diffusion model of decision making. Decision, 2(4), 237. DOI: 10.1037/dec0000030
- Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 527–544. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1025
- Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
- Rodd, J. M. (2018).
Lexical Ambiguity . In M. G. Gaskell & S.-A. Rueschemeyer. (Eds.), Oxford Academic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.5 - Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 411–427. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619885860
- Rodd, J. M. (2022).
Word-meaning access: The one-to-many mapping from form to meaning . In A. Papafragou, J. C. Trueswell, & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.1 - Rodd, J. M., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2005). The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: FMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1261–1269. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi009
- Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Dissociating frontotemporal contributions to semantic ambiguity resolution in spoken sentences. Cerebral Cortex, 22(8), 1761–1773. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr252
- Rodd, J. M., Longe, O. A., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2010). The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1324–1335. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.035
- Rodd, J. M., Lopez Cutrin, B., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.08.002
- Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of educational measurement (pp. 335–343). DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00211.x
- Rouder, J., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). Why Most Studies of Individual Differences With Inhibition Tasks Are Bound To Fail [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5
- Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452–467. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
- RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio. Retrieved from
http://www.rstudio.com/ - Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
- Schubert, A. L., Frischkorn, G. T., Hagemann, D., & Voss, A. (2016). Trait characteristics of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Intelligence, 4(3), 7. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence4030007
- Schuch, S., Philipp, A. M., Maulitz, L., & Koch, I. (2021). On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect. Psychological Research (pp. 1–27). DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01627-x
- Scott, G. G., Keitel, A., Becirspahic, M., Yao, B., & Sereno, S. C. (2019). The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1258–1270. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3
- Siew, C. S. Q., Yi, K., & Lee, C. H. (2021). Syllable and letter similarity effects in Korean: Insights from the Korean Lexicon Project. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104170
- Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x
- Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
- Stark, C. E. L., & McClelland, J. L. (2000). Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 945–972. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.945
- Staub, A. (2021). How reliable are individual differences in eye movements in reading? Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104190. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104190
- Taylor, J. E., Beith, A., & Sereno, S. C. (2020). LexOPS: An R package and user interface for the controlled generation of word stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 2372–2382. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01389-1
- Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
- Tse, C.-S., Chan, Y.-L., Yap, M. J., & Tsang, H. C. (2022). The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words. Behavior Research Methods. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-02022-z
- Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2011). Individual differences methods for randomized experiments. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 298. DOI: 10.1037/a0023349
- Twilley, L. C., Dixon, P., Taylor, D., & Clark, K. (1994). University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs. Memory & cognition, 22(1), 111–126. DOI: 10.3758/BF03202766
- Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983).
Strategies of discourse comprehension . New York: Academic Press. - van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
- Vitello, S., & Rodd, J. M. (2015). Resolving Semantic Ambiguities in Sentences: Cognitive Processes and Brain Mechanisms. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(10), 391–405. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12160
- Vitello, S., Warren, J. E., Devlin, J. T., & Rodd, J. M. (2014). Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(JULY). DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530
- Vuong, L. C., & Martin, R. C. (2014). Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(3), 312–325. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.836231
- Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013).
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition (CELF-5) . Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson. - Woodcock, R. W. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Technical Report.