References
- 1Adam, K. C. S., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2017). Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cognitive Psychology, 97, 79–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.07.001
- 2Barrouillet, P., Gorin, S., & Camos, V. (2021). Simple spans underestimate verbal working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 633–665. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000957
- 3Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01003922
- 4Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 1011–1025. DOI: 10.1177/1745691620906415
- 5Cowan, N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2013). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 731–747. DOI: 10.1037/a0029687
- 6Cowan, N., Hardman, K., Saults, J. S., Blume, C. L., Clark, K. M., & Sunday, M. A. (2016). Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 169–185. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000163
- 7Cowan, N., Rouder, J. N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2012). Models of verbal working memory capacity: What does it take to make them work? Psychological Review, 119, 480–499. DOI: 10.1037/a0027791
- 8Endress, A. D., & Potter, M. C. (2014). Large capacity temporary visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 548–565. DOI: 10.1037/a0033934
- 9Hardman, K. O., Vergauwe, E., & Ricker, T. J. (2017). Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 30–54. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000290
- 10JASP Team. (2020). JASP version 0.14.1 (computer software). Downloaded from
https://jasp-stats.org/ - 11Lee, C. L., & Estes, W. K. (1981). Item and order information in short term memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 149–169. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.149
- 12Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279281. DOI: 10.1038/36846
- 13Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 347–56. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3655
- 14Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. DOI: 10.1037/h0043158
- 15Mickes, L., Seale-Carlisle, T. M., & Wixted, J. T. (2013). Rethinking familiarity: Remember/Know judgments in free recall. Journal of memory and language, 68(4), 333–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.001
- 16Nosofsky, R. M., & Donkin, C. (2016). Qualitative contrast between knowledge-limited mixed-state and variable-resources models of visual change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1507–1525. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000268
- 17Oberauer, K. (2018). On the automaticity of familiarity in short-term recognition: A test of the dual-process assumption with the PRP paradigm. Journal of Cognition, 1, 20, 1–19, DOI: 10.5334/joc.21
- 18Oberauer, K. (2019). Working memory capacity limits memory for bindings. Journal of Cognition, 2, 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/joc.86
- 19Oberauer, K., & Lin, H. Y. (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124, 21–59. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000044
- 20Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S.,. Hitch, G. J., Hurlstone, M., Ma, W. J., Morey, C. C., Nee, D. E., Schweppe, J., Vergauwe, E., & Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(9), 885–958. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000153
- 21Poirier, M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence on the Influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 384–404. DOI: 10.1080/14640749508401396
- 22Pratte, M. S., Park, Y. E., Rademaker, R. L., & Tong, F. (2017). Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 6–17. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000302
- 23Rhodes, S., Cowan, N., Hardman, K. O., & Logie, R. H. (2018). Informed guessing in change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1023–1035. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000495
- 24Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 67–88. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2701
- 25Schurgin, M. W., Wixted, J. T., & Brady, T. F. (2020). Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1156–1172. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0
- 26Vergauwe, E., Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2014). The impact of storage on processing: How is information maintained in working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 1072–1095. DOI: 10.1037/a0035779
- 27Wolfe, J. M. (2012). Saved by a log: How do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search? Psychological Science, 23, 698–703. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612443968