Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reflecting Reality, Amplifying Bias? Using Metaphors to Teach Critical AI Literacy Cover

Reflecting Reality, Amplifying Bias? Using Metaphors to Teach Critical AI Literacy

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2025 (2025): Issue 1
By: Jasper Roe,  Mike Perkins and  Leon Furze  
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. 1Alger, CL. 2009. ‘Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5): 743–751. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.004
    Back to article
  2. 2Anderson, SS. 2023. ‘“Places to stand”: Multiple metaphors for framing ChatGPT’s corpus’. Computers and Composition, 68:, 102778. DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102778
    Back to article
  3. 3Avila, J and Pandya, JZ. 2012. ‘This issue’. Theory into Practice, 51(1): 1–3. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41331065. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2012.636321
    Back to article
  4. 4Bali, M. 1 April 2023. What I mean when I say critical AI literacy. Reflecting Allowed. Available at: https://blog.mahabali.me/educational-technology-2/what-i-mean-when-i-say-critical-ai-literacy/
    Back to article
  5. 5Batten, AJ. 2012. ‘Metaphors we teach by: The language of “learning outcomes”’. Teaching Theology & Religion, 15(1): 16–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9647.2011.00756.x
    Back to article
  6. 6Bender, EM, Gebru, T, McMillan-Major, A and Shmitchell, S. 2021. ‘On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?’ Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445922
    Back to article
  7. 7Bozkurt, A, Xiao, F, Lambert, S, Pazurek, A, Crompton, H, Koseoglu, S, Farrow, R, Bond, M, Nerantzi, C, Honeychurch, S, Bali, M, Dron, J, Mir, K, Stewart, B, Costello, E, Mason, J, Stracke, C, Romero-Hall, E and Jandric, P. 2023. ‘Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape’. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1): 53–130. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7636568
    Back to article
  8. 8Campolo, A and Crawford, K. 2020. ‘Enchanted determinism: Power without responsibility in artificial intelligence’. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6: 1–19. DOI: 10.17351/ests2020.277
    Back to article
  9. 9Carbonell, J, Sánchez-Esguevillas, A and Carro, B. 2016. ‘The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of the artificial intelligence’. Futures, 84: 145–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.019
    Back to article
  10. 10Carter, S and Pitcher, R. 2010. ‘Extended metaphors for pedagogy: Using sameness and difference’. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5): 579–589. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.491904
    Back to article
  11. 11Chiu, TKF, Ahmad, Z, Ismailov, M and Sanusi, IT. 2024. ‘What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them’. Computers and Education Open, 6: 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
    Back to article
  12. 12Clarken, RH. 1997. Five metaphors for educators. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED407408
    Back to article
  13. 13Crawford, K. 2021. The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/9780300252392
    Back to article
  14. 14Djonov, E and van Leeuwen, T. 2018. ‘The power of semiotic software: A critical multimodal perspective’. In: Flowerdew, JJ and Richardson, JE (eds.) The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315739342-39
    Back to article
  15. 15Donoghue, D. 2014. Metaphor. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
    Back to article
  16. 16Driessens, O and Pischetola, M. 2024. ‘Danish university policies on generative AI: Problems, assumptions and sustainability blind spots’. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 40(76): 31–52. DOI: 10.7146/mk.v40i76.143595
    Back to article
  17. 17Ferreira, GM dos S, Lemgruber, MS and Cabrera, TL. 2023. ‘From didachography to AI: Metaphors teaching is automated by’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2023(1). DOI: 10.5334/jime.798
    Back to article
  18. 18Furze, L. 2024. AI metaphors we live by: The language of artificial intelligence. Leon Furze. Available at: https://leonfurze.com/2024/07/19/ai-metaphors-we-live-by-the-language-of-artificial-intelligence/
    Back to article
  19. 19Garcia, A and Nichols, TP. 2021. ‘Digital platforms aren’t mere tools—they’re complex environments’. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(6): 14–19. Complementary Index. DOI: 10.1177/0031721721998148
    Back to article
  20. 20Gibbs Jr, RW. 2008. ‘Metaphor and thought: The state of the art’. In: Gibbs Jr, RW (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–13. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002
    Back to article
  21. 21Gozzi Jr, R. 1994. ‘A note on the metaphorically charged discourse of early artificial intelligence’. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(3): 233–240. DOI: 10.1207/s15327868ms0903_5
    Back to article
  22. 22Gupta, A, Atef, Y, Mills, A and Bali, M. 2024. ‘Assistant, parrot, or colonizing loudspeaker? ChatGPT metaphors for developing critical AI literacies’. Open Praxis, 16(1): 37–53. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.631
    Back to article
  23. 23Hager, P. 2008. ‘Learning and metaphors’. Medical Teacher, 30(7): 679–686. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802148899
    Back to article
  24. 24Haidet, P, Jarecke, J, Yang, C, Teal, C, Street, R and Stuckey, H. 2017. ‘Using jazz as a metaphor to teach improvisational communication skills’. Healthcare, 5(3): 41. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare5030041
    Back to article
  25. 25Hermann, I. 2023. ‘Artificial intelligence in fiction: Between narratives and metaphors’. AI & SOCIETY, 38(1): 319–329. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6
    Back to article
  26. 26Hunger, F. 2023. Unhype artificial ’intelligence’! A proposal to replace the deceiving terminology of AI. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7524493
    Back to article
  27. 27Ichien, N, Stamenković, D and Holyoak, KJ. 2024. ‘Large language model displays emergent ability to interpret novel literary metaphors’. Metaphor and Symbol, 39(4): 296–309. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2024.2380348
    Back to article
  28. 28Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (1. publ. in paperback 2008, updated with a new afterword [Repr.]). New York University Press.
    Back to article
  29. 29Jin, F, Sun, L, Pan, Y and Lin, CH. 2025. ‘High heels, compass, Spider-Man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing’. Computers & Education, 105248. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248
    Back to article
  30. 30Kövecses, Z. 2020. ‘A brief outline of “Standard” Conceptual Metaphor Theory and some outstanding issues’. In: Kövecses, Z (ed.) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1017/9781108859127.002
    Back to article
  31. 31Knight, J, Dooly, M and Barberà, E. 2020. ‘Getting smart: Towards critical digital literacy pedagogies’. Social Semiotics, 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2020.1836815
    Back to article
  32. 32Lakoff, G and Johnson, M. 2003. Metaphors we live by. With a new afterword. University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3637992.html
    Back to article
  33. 33Laupichler, MC, Aster, A, Schirch, J and Raupach, T. 2022. ‘Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review’. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3: 100101. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
    Back to article
  34. 34Long, D and Magerko, B. 2020. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376727
    Back to article
  35. 35Low, G. 2008. ‘Metaphor and education’. In: Gibbs Jr, RW (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 212–231. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.014
    Back to article
  36. 36McMullen, LM and Tay, D. 2023. ‘Research review of psychotherapists’ use of metaphors’. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 60(3): 255–265. DOI: 10.1037/pst0000473
    Back to article
  37. 37Miao, F, Shiohira, K and Lao, N. 2024. AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389154
    Back to article
  38. 38Nicenboim, I, Venkat, S, Rustad, NL, Vardanyan, D, Giaccardi, E and Redström, J. 2023. ‘Conversation starters: How can we misunderstand AI better?’ Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–4. DOI: 10.1145/3544549.3583914
    Back to article
  39. 39Niemeier, S. 2017. ‘Teaching (in) metaphors’. In: Ervas, F, Gola, E and Rossi, MG (eds.) Metaphor in communication, science and education. De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 267–282. DOI: 10.1515/9783110549928-015
    Back to article
  40. 40Pager-McClymont, K and Papathanasiou, E. 2023. ‘“Metaphors we learn by”: Teaching essay structure and argumentation through conceptual metaphors’. English in Education, 57(4): 314–333. DOI: 10.1080/04250494.2023.2240353
    Back to article
  41. 41Pangrazio, L. 2016. ‘Reconceptualising critical digital literacy’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2): 163–174. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
    Back to article
  42. 42Perkins, M, Roe, J and Furze, L. 2024. The AI assessment scale revisited: A framework for educational assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09029.
    Back to article
  43. 43Rehak, R. 2021. ‘“Action” and ascription: On misleading metaphors in the debate about artificial intelligence and transhumanism’. In: Hofkirchner, W and Kreowski, H-J (eds.) Transhumanism: The proper guide to a posthuman condition or a dangerous idea? Springer International Publishing. pp. 155–165. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56546-6_11
    Back to article
  44. 44Roe, J. 2025. ‘Generative AI as cultural artifact: Applying anthropological methods to AI literacy’. Postdigital Science and Education, 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-025-00547-y
    Back to article
  45. 45Saban, A. 2006. ‘Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay’. Teaching Education, 17(4): 299–315. DOI: 10.1080/10476210601017386
    Back to article
  46. 46Sam, G and Catrinel, H. 2006. ‘On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails’. Mind & Language, 21(3): 360–378. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x
    Back to article
  47. 47Şentürk, R and Akol Göktaş, S. 2024. ‘Determining the metaphorical perceptions of German teacher candidates regarding the concept of artificial intelligence’. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 6(2): 322–350. DOI: 10.47806/ijesacademic.1527105
    Back to article
  48. 48Smith, AL, Greaves, F and Panch, T. 2023. ‘Hallucination or confabulation? Neuroanatomy as metaphor in large language models’. PLOS Digital Health, 2(11): e0000388. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000388
    Back to article
  49. 49Sperling, K, Stenberg, CJ, McGrath, C, Åkerfeldt, A, Heintz, F and Stenliden, L. 2024. ‘In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review’. Computers and Education Open, 6: 100169. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
    Back to article
  50. 50Stolpe, K and Hallström, J. 2024. ‘Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education’. Computers and Education Open, 6:, 100159. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
    Back to article
  51. 51Su, J, Ng, DTK and Chu, SKW. 2023. ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities’. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4: 100124. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
    Back to article
  52. 52The Royal Society and Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. 2018. Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter: AI narratives workshop findings [PDF]. Royal Society. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/ai-narratives/AI-narratives-workshop-findings.pdf
    Back to article
  53. 53Van Dijck, J. 2021. ‘Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance’. New Media & Society, 23(9): 2801–2819. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820940293
    Back to article
  54. 54van Es, K and Nguyen, D. 2024. ‘“Your friendly AI assistant”: The anthropomorphic self-representations of ChatGPT and its implications for imagining AI’. AI & SOCIETY. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02108-6
    Back to article
  55. 55Willison, S. 2 April 2023. Think of language models like ChatGPT as a “calculator for words”. Simon Willison’s Weblog. Available at: https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/2/calculator-for-words/
    Back to article
  56. 56Yan, Y, Sun, W and Zhao, X. 2024. ‘Metaphorical conceptualizations of generative artificial intelligence use by Chinese university EFL learners’. Frontiers in Education, 9. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1430494
    Back to article
  57. 57Ye, Z and Li, J. 2024. ‘Artificial intelligence through the lens of metaphor: Analyzing the EU AIA’. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance. DOI: 10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0016
    Back to article
  58. 58Zhu, R and Gopnik, A. 2023. ‘Preschoolers and adults learn from novel metaphors’. Psychological Science, 34(6): 696–704. DOI: 10.1177/09567976231165267
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.961 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 27, 2025
Published on: Aug 26, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Critical AI literacy,
artificial intelligence,
metaphors in education,
GenAI

© 2025 Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins, Leon Furze, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2025 (2025): Issue 1Next article