References
- 1Alexander, RJ. 2008. Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. 4th Edition. York: Dialogos.
- 2Bakhtin, MM. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
- 3Beach, P, Favret, E and Minuk, A. 2021. Online teacher professional development in Canada: A review of the research. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(2). DOI: 10.21432/cjlt27948
- 4Bransford, JD, Brown, AL and Cocking, RR. 2000. How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- 5British Educational Research Association [BERA]. 2018. Ethical guidelines for educational research. 4th edition. London: BERA. Available at
https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 (Last accessed 24 May 2024). - 6Buchanan, R. 2015. Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 21(6): 700–719. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329
- 7Creswell, JW. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- 8Day, C and Sachs, J. 2004.
Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development . In: Day, C and Sachs, J (eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Glasgow: Open University Press. pp. 3–32. - 9Derri, V, Vasiliadou, O and Kioumourtzoglou, E. 2015. The effects of a short-term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behaviour and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2): 234–262. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2014.947024
- 10Dusdal, J and Powell, JJW. 2021. Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: A sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2): 235–245. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scab010
- 11Eddles-Hirsch, K. 2015. Phenomenology and educational research. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8): 251–260.
- 12Giorgi, A. 1985. Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
- 13Hartshorne, R, Baumgartner, E, Kaplan-Rakowski, R, Mouza, C and Ferdig, RE. 2020. Special issue editorial: Preservice and inservice professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28: 137–147.
- 14Husserl, E. 1999 [1907]. The Idea of phenomenology. Trans. Lee Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7386-3
- 15Lay, CD, Allman, B, Cutri, RM and Kimmons, R. 2020. Examining a decade of research in online teacher professional development. Frontiers in Education, 20. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.573129
- 16Lieberman, A and Miller, L. 2008. Teachers in professional communities: Improving teaching and learning. Teachers College Press.
- 17Littleton, K and Mercer, N. 2013. Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203809433
- 18Liyanagunawardena, T, Williams, S and Adams, A. 2013. The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers, 33.
https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/32452/1/In-depth_33_1.pdf . DOI: 10.11114/jets.v1i2.96 - 19Loughran, JJ. 2004.
A history and context of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices . In: Loughran, J, Hamilton, ML, LaBoskey, VK and Russell, T (eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 7–39. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_1 - 20Luneta, K. 2012. Designing continuous professional development programmes for teachers: A literature review. Africa Education Review, 9(2): 360–379. DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2012.722395
- 21Major, L, Warwick, P, Rasmussen, I, Ludvigen, S and Cook, V. 2018. Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5): 1995–2028. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y
- 22Mercer, J. 2007. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/03054980601094651
- 23Mercer, N, Hennessy, S and Warwick, P. 2019. Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some implications of a continuing line of inquiry for developing dialogic teaching practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
- 24Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781412995658
- 25Pinnegar, S and Hamilton, M. 2009.
The self, the other, and practice in self-study of teaching and teacher education practices research . In: Hamilton, ML and Pinnegar, S (eds.), Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. Self study of teaching and teacher education practices (vol. 8). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9512-2_2 - 26Quota, M, Cobo, C, Wilichowski, T and Patil, A. 2022. Effective teacher professional development using technology: Technology-based strategies from across the globe to enhance teaching practices: A guidance note. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available at
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099835106172233833/P1742520d4de390610b784047359e0cefc7 (Last accessed 24 May 2024). - 27Rienties, B, Divjak, B, Eichhorn, M, Iniesto, F, Saunders-Smits, G, Svetec, B, Tillmann, A and Zizak, M. 2023. Online professional development across institutions and borders. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1):
30 . DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00399-1 - 28Ryoo, J, Goode, J and Margolis, J. 2015. It takes a village: Supporting inquiry- and equity-oriented computer science pedagogy through a professional learning community. Computer Science Education, 25(4): 351–370. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1130952
- 29Samaras, A and Freese, A. 2009.
Looking back and looking forward: An historical overview of the self-study school . In: Lasonde, CA and Galman, S (eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1163/9789087906900_002 - 30Sawyer, RD. 2001. Teacher decision-making as a fulcrum for teacher development: Exploring structures of growth. Teacher Development, 5(1): 39–58. DOI: 10.1080/13664539700200133
- 31Sentance, S. 2016. A holistic approach to teacher professional development in computing. Available at
https://suesentance.net/2016/08/12/a-holistic-approach-to-teacher-professional-development-in-computing/ (Last accessed 24 May 2024). - 32Shor, I and Freire, P. 1987. What is the ‘dialogical method’ of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3): 11–31. DOI: 10.1177/002205748716900303
- 33Wegerif, R. 2013. Dialogic: Education for the internet age. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203111222
- 34Wegerif, R, Doney, J, Richards, A, Mansour, N, Larkin, S and Jamison, I. 2017. Exploring the ontological dimension of dialogic education through an evaluation of the impact of internet mediated dialogue across cultural difference. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 20: 80–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.003
- 35Wenger-Trayner, B and Wenger-Trayner, E. 2015. Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Available at
https://www.wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/ (Last accessed 24 May 2024). - 36Yurkofsky, MM, Blum-Smith, S and Brennan, K. 2019. Expanding outcomes: Exploring varied conceptions of teacher learning in an online professional development experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002