Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Scholarship from the Periphery: Insights from Researchers in Chile on Academia.edu and ResearchGate Cover

Digital Scholarship from the Periphery: Insights from Researchers in Chile on Academia.edu and ResearchGate

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2024 (2024): Issue 1
By: Rocío Knipp  
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. 1Academia.edu. 2023. About. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/about (Last accessed 20 June 2023).
    Back to article
  2. 2Andrea, BA, Miguel, N-T, Frank, G-R, Ramiro, C and Andrés, BP. 2022. Visibility of scientific production and digital identity of researchers through digital technologies. Education Sciences, 12(12). DOI: 10.3390/educsci12120926
    Back to article
  3. 3Araneda-Guirriman, C and Sepúlveda-Páez, G. 2021. Reflexiones sobre los desafíos que enfrentan las académicas en el contexto del capitalismo académico. Formación Universitaria, 14(5): 75–84. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-50062021000500075
    Back to article
  4. 4Arboledas-Lérida, L. 2021. On the coercive nature of research impact metrics: The case study of Altmetrics and science communication. Social Epistemology, 35(5): 461–474. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2021.1919237
    Back to article
  5. 5Artigas, W and Casanova, I. 2020. Influencia de las redes sociales académicas en la construcción de la identidad digital latinoamericana. Anales de Documentación, 23(2): 1–13. DOI: 10.6018/analesdoc.397551
    Back to article
  6. 6Basantes-Andrade, A, Naranjo-Toro, M, Guerra-Reyes, F, Carrascal, R and Benavides-Piedra, A. 2022. Visibility of scientific production and digital identity of researchers through digital technologies. Education Sciences, 12(12): 926. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12120926
    Back to article
  7. 7Bernasconi, A, Berríos Cortés, P, Guzmán, P, Véliz, D and Celis, S. 2021. La profesión académica en Chile: Perspectivas desde una encuesta internacional. Calidad en la Educación, 54: 46–72. DOI: 10.31619/caledu.n54.923
    Back to article
  8. 8Brunner, JJ. 2017. La economía política del capitalismo académico: El caso de Chile. In: Lavados, H and Durán, A, (eds.), Desafíos para el desarrollo universitario en Chile. Valencia: Tirant Humanidades. pp. 159–211.
    Back to article
  9. 9Campos Freire, F, Rivera, D and Rodríguez, C. 2014. La presencia e impacto de las universidades de los países andinos en las redes sociales digitales. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 69: 571–592. DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2014-1025
    Back to article
  10. 10Carrigan, M and Jordan, K. 2022. Platforms and institutions in the post-pandemic university: A case study of social media and the impact agenda. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2): 354–372. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x
    Back to article
  11. 11Chiappa, R and Labraña, J. 2023. Doctorate education in Chile: The race to increase the production of doctorate holders and the obsession of quantifying quality. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5): 632–645. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2237959
    Back to article
  12. 12Chugh, R, Grose, R and Macht, SA. 2021. Social media usage by higher education academics: A scoping review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1): 983–999. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10288-z
    Back to article
  13. 13Constantino, GD, Raffaghelli, JE and Teijeiro, M. 2015. Profesión Académica Digital (Digital Scholarship): Transformaciones del trabajo académico en clave de redes sociales. Virtual Educa – Seminario Sistemas y Ambientes Educativos –15 June. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3942.4168
    Back to article
  14. 14D’Alessandro, S, Miles, M, Martínez-López, F, Anaya-Sánchez, R, Esteban-Millat, I and Torrez-Meruvia, H. 2020. Promote or perish? A brief note on academic social networking sites and academic reputation. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5–6): 405–411. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1697104
    Back to article
  15. 15Delfanti, A. 2021. The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media. Social Studies of Science, 51(2): 259–276. DOI: 10.1177/0306312720966649
    Back to article
  16. 16Denzin, N and Lincoln, Y. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
    Back to article
  17. 17Desrochers, N, Paul-hus, A, Haustein, S, Mongeon, P, Quan-haase, A, Bowman, TD, Pecoskie, J and Tsou, A. 2018. Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science. Social Science Information, 57(2): 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/0539018417752089
    Back to article
  18. 18Djonov, E and Van Leeuwen, T. 2018. Social media as semiotic technology and social practice: The case of ResearchGate’s design and its potential to transform social practice. Social Semiotics, 28(5): 641–664. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504715
    Back to article
  19. 19Dobele, AR and Wastell, E. 2019. Self-promotion and academic branding: Career progression strategy. In EDULEARN19 Proceedings, p. 9034. https://library.iated.org/view/DOBELE2019SEL.
    Back to article
  20. 20Dorantes y Aguilar, GL. 2019. La práctica de producir y difundir contenidos académicos en, por y para la red entre los académicos de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas Sociales, 64(236). DOI: 10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.236.64576
    Back to article
  21. 21Duarte, C. 2022. Separar para construir. Análisis cualitativo de información. Social Ediciones: Universidad de Chile.
    Back to article
  22. 22Duffy, BE and Pooley, JD. 2017. “Facebook for academics”: The convergence of self-branding and social media logic on Academia.edu. Social Media and Society, 3(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117696523
    Back to article
  23. 23Fardella, C, Sisto, V and Jiménez, F. 2017. La transformación de la universidad y los dispositivos de cuantificación. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 34(3): 435–448. DOI: 10.1590/1982-02752017000300011
    Back to article
  24. 24García-Peñalvo, FJ. 2018. Identidad digital como investigadores. La evidencia y la transparencia de la producción científica. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19: 7–28. DOI: 10.14201/eks2018192728
    Back to article
  25. 25Greenhow, C, Gleason, B and Staudt Willet, KB. 2019. Social scholarship revisited: Changing scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3): 987–1004. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12772
    Back to article
  26. 26Guzmán-Valenzuela, C and Barnett, R. 2013. Academic fragilities in a marketised age: The case of Chile. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(2): 203–220. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2013.776006
    Back to article
  27. 27Guzmán-Valenzuela, C and Martínez, M. 2016. Tensiones en la construcción de identidades académicas en una universidad chilena. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 42(3): 191–206. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-07052016000400010
    Back to article
  28. 28Hall, R. 2013. Educational technology and the enclosure of academic labour inside public higher education. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(3): 52–82. Available at: http://www.jceps.com/index.php?pageID=article&articleID=297.
    Back to article
  29. 29Hammarfelt, B, Rijcke, D and Rushforth. 2016. Quantified academic selves: The gamification of research through social networking services. Information Research, 21(2).
    Back to article
  30. 30Haustein, S. 2016. Grand challenges in Altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics,108(1): 413–23. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9
    Back to article
  31. 31Haustein, S, Costas, R and Larivière, V. 2015. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0120495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
    Back to article
  32. 32Herman, E. 2018. Scholarly reputation. FEMS microbiology letters, 365(18). DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny200
    Back to article
  33. 33Ivancheva, M and Garvey, B. 2022. Putting the university to work: The subsumption of academic labour in UK’s shift to digital higher education. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37: 381–397. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12237
    Back to article
  34. 34Jordan, K. 2014. Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v19i11.4937
    Back to article
  35. 35Jordan, K and Weller, M. 2018. Academics and social networking sites: Benefits, problems and tensions in professional engagement with online networking. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1): 1, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.5334/jime.448
    Back to article
  36. 36Kandiko, CB, Coate, K and de St Croix, T. 2018. Mid-career academic women and the prestige economy. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3): 533–548. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1411337
    Back to article
  37. 37Kjellberg, S and Haider, J. 2019. Researchers’ online visibility: Tensions of visibility, trust and reputation. Online Information Review, 43(3): 426–439. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-07-2017-0211
    Back to article
  38. 38Lupton, D. 2014. ‘Feeling better connected’: Academics’ use of social media. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
    Back to article
  39. 39Lupton, D, Mewburn, I and Thomson, P. 2018. The digital academic. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Back to article
  40. 40Manca, S and Ranieri, M. 2016. “Yes, for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social media in academic practices. Internet and Higher Education, 29: 63–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.004
    Back to article
  41. 41Marquina, M. 2020. Between the global and the local: The study of the academic profession from a Latin American perspective. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 1(1): 63–75.
    Back to article
  42. 42Marquina, M. 2021. La profesión académica latinoamericana: La mirada de José Joaquín Brunner/The Latin American academic profession: The perspective of José Joaquín Brunner. Revista de Educación, 24(2): 269–280
    Back to article
  43. 43Monteiro-Krebs, L, Zaman, B, Geerts, D and Caregnato, SE. 2023. Every word you say: Algorithmic mediation and implications of data-driven scholarly communication. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2): 1003–1012. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01468-1
    Back to article
  44. 44Muscanell, N and Utz, S. 2017. Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(5): 744–759. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185
    Back to article
  45. 45Muñoz-García, AL. 2019. Intellectual endogamy in the university: The neoliberal regulation of academic work. Learning and Teaching, 12(2): 24–43. DOI: 10.3167/latiss.2019.120203
    Back to article
  46. 46Ortega, JL. 2018. Disciplinary differences of the impact of altmetric. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(7). DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny049
    Back to article
  47. 47Pearce, N, Weller, M, Scanlon, E and Ashleigh, M. 2010. Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work, Education, 16(1). DOI: 10.37119/ojs2010.v16i1.44
    Back to article
  48. 48Raffaghelli, JE and Manca, S. 2018. Exploring the geographies of academic social network sites from a socio-technical perspective: An investigation of scientific literature in Spanish. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Networked Learning. pp. 409–416.
    Back to article
  49. 49Researchgate. 2022. Why we’re removing the RG Score (and what’s next). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/researchgate-updates/removing-the-rg-score (Last accessed 29 June 2023).
    Back to article
  50. 50Researchgate. 2023. About us. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/about (Last accessed 2 July 2023).
    Back to article
  51. 51Robinson-García, N, van Leeuwen, T and Ràfols, I. 2018. Using Altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impacts: From hits to networks. Science & Public Policy, 45(6): 815–826. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy024
    Back to article
  52. 52Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. New York, NY: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    Back to article
  53. 53Salmons, J. 2017. Using social media in data collection: Designing studies with the Qualitative E-Research Framework. In: Quan-Haase, A and Sloan, L, (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. London: SAGE. pp. 177–196. DOI: 10.4135/9781473983847.n12
    Back to article
  54. 54Saura, G and Bolívar, A. 2019. Sujeto académico neoliberal: Cuantificado, digitalizado y bibliometrificado. REICE, 17(4): 9. DOI: 10.15366/reice2019.17.4.001
    Back to article
  55. 55SCImago. n.d. SJR – SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. Available at: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?region=Latin%20America&year=2022 (Last accessed 29 July 2023).
    Back to article
  56. 56Simbürger, E and Neary, M. 2016. Taxi professors: Academic labour in Chile – a critical practical response to the politics of worker identity. Workplace, 48–73.
    Back to article
  57. 57Slaughter, S and Leslie, LL. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Back to article
  58. 58Sugimoto, CR, Work, S, Larivière, V and Haustein, S. 2017. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9): 2037–2062. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23833
    Back to article
  59. 59Thelwall, M, Haustein, S, Larivière, V and Sugimoto, C. 2013. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5): 1–7. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
    Back to article
  60. 60Thelwall, M and Kousha, K. 2014. ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23236
    Back to article
  61. 61Uribe-Tirado, A and Alhuay-Quispe, J. 2019. Visibilidad e impacto altmétrico de los investigadores de la Universidad de Antioquia: Metodología aplicable a universidades. Transinformação, 31. DOI: 10.1590/2318-0889201931e190016
    Back to article
  62. 62Van Noorden, R. 2010. Metrics: A profusion of measures. Nature, 465(7300): 864–6. DOI: 10.1038/465864a
    Back to article
  63. 63Van Noorden, R. 2014. Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513): 126–129. DOI: 10.1038/512126a
    Back to article
  64. 64Veletsianos, G and Kimmons, R. 2012. Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers and Education, 58(2): 766–774. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001
    Back to article
  65. 65Weller, M. 2011. The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781849666275
    Back to article
  66. 66Yammine, S, Liu, C, Jarreau, P and Coe, I. 2018. Social media for social change in science. Science, 13(6385): 162–163. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat7303
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.856 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 3, 2023
Accepted on: Jan 22, 2024
Published on: May 7, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
digital scholarship,
academic social networking sites,
Academia.edu,
ResearchGate,
academic profession,
academic capitalism

© 2024 Rocío Knipp, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2024 (2024): Issue 1Next article