Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Environments of Education 4.0 and complex thinking: Communicative Literacy to close the digital gender gap Cover

Digital Environments of Education 4.0 and complex thinking: Communicative Literacy to close the digital gender gap

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2024 (2024): Issue 1
By: Carlos Enrique George-Reyes,  Iris Cristina Peláez-Sánchez and  Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales  
Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. 1Abdul, S, Selamat, A, Krejcar, A, Maresova, P and Thanh, N. 2020. Digital learning demand for future education 4.0—case studies at Malaysia education institutions. Informatics, 7(2): 13. DOI: 10.3390/informatics7020013
    Back to article
  2. 2Abu-Shanab, E and Al-Jamal, N. 2015. Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1): 91–113. DOI: 10.1177/0971852414563201
    Back to article
  3. 3Afiani, I. 2018. Advancing women’s digital skills and economic empowerment through girls in tech Indonesia: A case study. SALASIKA: Indonesian Journal of Gender, Women, Child, and Social Inclusion’s Studies, 35(2): 21–32. DOI: 10.36625/sj.v1i1.39
    Back to article
  4. 4Aguilar Gavira, S and Barroso Osuna, JM. 2015. La triangulación de datos como estrategia en investigación educativa. Pixel-bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 47: 73–88. DOI: 10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i47.05
    Back to article
  5. 5Alozie, NO and Akpan-Obong, P. 2017. The digital gender divide: Confronting obstacles to women’s development in Africa. Development Policy Review, 35(2): 137–160. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12204
    Back to article
  6. 6Anacona, J, Millán, E and Gómez, C. 2019. Aplicación de los metaversos y la realidad virtual en la enseñanza. Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería, 13(25): 59–67. DOI: 10.31908/19098367.4015
    Back to article
  7. 7Ayala Pezzutti, RJ, Laurente Cárdenas, CM, Escuza Mesías, CD, Núñez Lira, LA and Díaz Dumont, JR. 2020. Mundos virtuales y el aprendizaje inmersivo en educación superior. Propósitos y representaciones, 8(1). DOI: 10.20511/pyr2020.v8n1.430
    Back to article
  8. 8Bala, S and Singhal, P. 2018. Gender digital divide in India: A case of inter-regional analysis of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(2): 173–192. DOI: 10.1108/JICES-07-2017-0046
    Back to article
  9. 9Banerjee, P. 2019. Gender digital divide – examining the reality. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(11 Special Issue): 214–219. DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.K1044.09811S19
    Back to article
  10. 10Barráez-Herrera, DP. 2022. Metaversos en el contexto de la educación virtual. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 13(1): 11–19. DOI: 10.37843/rted.v13i1.300
    Back to article
  11. 11Bikos, K, Stamovlasis, D and Tzifopoulos, M. 2018. Dimensions of digital divide and relationships with social factors: A study of Greek pre-service teachers. Themes in eLearning, 11(1): 23–34. http://earthlab.uoi.gr/tel/index.php/themeselearn/article/view/12.
    Back to article
  12. 12Blaschke, LM and Marín, VI. 2020. Applications of heutagogy in the educational use of e-portfolios. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(64). DOI: 10.6018/red.407831
    Back to article
  13. 13Brozzi, R, Forti, D, Rauch, E and Matt, DT. 2020. The advantages of Industry 4.0 applications for sustainability: Results from a sample of manufacturing companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). DOI: 10.3390/su12093647
    Back to article
  14. 14Busch, L. 2019. The digital gender divide: Confronting obstacles to inclusion. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1): 9–27. https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/digital-gender-divide-confronting-obstacles-inclusion.
    Back to article
  15. 15Chandra, A. 2022. Bridging the digital gender divide: Prerequisite for women empowerment. In: Bala, S and Singhal, P (eds.), Gender perspectives on Industry 4.0 and the impact of technology on mainstreaming female employment. IGI Global. pp. 31–44. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8594-8.ch002
    Back to article
  16. 16Chavez, B and Bayona, S. 2018. Virtual reality in the learning process. In Kacprzyk, J (ed.), Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 746: 1345–1356. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_129
    Back to article
  17. 17Choi, EY, Kim, Y, Chipalo, E, Lee, HY and Meeks, S. 2020. Does perceived ageism widen the digital divide? and does it vary by gender? Gerontologist, 60(7): 1213–1223. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa066
    Back to article
  18. 18Corneli, J, Jeffrey Danoff, C, Ricaurte, P and Snow Macdonald, L. 2015. Patterns of peeragogy. PLoP ’15: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, pp. 1–23.
    Back to article
  19. 19Cortés, F, Dal Peraro, M and Abriata, L. 2022. Online tools to easily build virtual molecular models for display in augmented and virtual reality on the web. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2022.108164
    Back to article
  20. 20de Andrés del Campo, S, Collado Alonso, R and García-Lomas Taboada, JI. 2020. Brechas digitales de género. Una revisión del concepto. Etic@net. Revista científica electrónica de Educación y Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, 20(1): 34–58. DOI: 10.30827/eticanet.v20i1.15521
    Back to article
  21. 21Elena-Bucea, A, Cruz-Jesus, F, Oliveira, T and Coelho, PS. 2021. Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4): 1007–1021. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9
    Back to article
  22. 22European Institute for Gender Equality. 2019. Gender equality and the digital world. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-and-digital-world.
    Back to article
  23. 23Floyd, LA. 2020. Canada’s CanCode Initiative and the gender gap in computer science education. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2020. https://lisaannefloyd.com/publications-and-media/. DOI: 10.1145/3328778.3372571
    Back to article
  24. 24Gebhardt, E, Thomson, S, Ainley, J and Hillman, K. 2019. Gender differences in computer and information literacy: An in-depth analysis of data from ICILS. Springer https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-26203-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26203-7_1
    Back to article
  25. 25Glasserman-Morales, LD, Ruíz-Ramírez, JA and Rocha, FJ. 2022. Transformando la educación superior mediante WebVR: Un caso de estudio. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 17(3): 230–34. DOI: 10.1109/RITA.2022.3191257
    Back to article
  26. 26Gorlach, K and Agic, D. 2019. Gender digital divide in Europe. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 11(1): 78–92. DOI: 10.30845/ijbht.v10n4p2
    Back to article
  27. 27Guo, H and Gao, W. 2022. Metaverse-powered experiential situational English-teaching design: An emotion-based analysis method. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859159
    Back to article
  28. 28Hackl, C. 2 May 2021. Defining the metaverse today. Forbes [online]. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/cathyhackl/2021/05/02/defining-the-metaverse-today/.
    Back to article
  29. 29Huang, YC, Backman, SJ, Backman, KF, McGuire, FA and Moore, DW. 2019. An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1): 591–611. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
    Back to article
  30. 30Huyer, S and Sikoska, T. 2018. Gender and the digital revolution. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260153.
    Back to article
  31. 31Ijiri, A. 2022. Immersive learning in virtual reality. International Conference on The Future of Education. https://conference.pixel-online.net/files/foe/ed0012/FP/7778-ICT5506-FP-FOE12.pdf.
    Back to article
  32. 32International Telecommunication Union. 2020. Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2020.pdf.
    Back to article
  33. 33Jiang, W and Luh, Y. 2017. Gender digital divide in a patriarchal society: What can we learn from Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition? Quality and Quantity, 51(6): 2555–2576. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0409-z
    Back to article
  34. 34Kerras, H, Sánchez-Navarro, JL, López-Becerra, EI and de-Miguel Gomez, MD. 2020. The impact of the gender digital divide on sustainable development: Comparative analysis between the European Union and the Maghreb. Sustainability, 12(8): 3347. DOI: 10.3390/su12083347
    Back to article
  35. 35Khamis, S and Vaughn, K. 2018. Gender and digital divides in the Arab region: Foundations for a research agenda. Information, Communication & Society, 21(9): 1267–1283. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1335854.
    Back to article
  36. 36Kovaliuk, T and Kobets, N. 2021. The concept of an innovative educational ecosystem of Ukraine in the context of the approach “Education 4.0 for Industry 4.0”. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
    Back to article
  37. 37Krchová, H and Höesová, KŠ. 2021. Selected determinants of digital transformation and their influence on the number of women in the ICT sector. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(4): 524–535. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(31)
    Back to article
  38. 38Kumari, M. 2023. Examining the impact of ICT and education in empowering women for self-reliance: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Applied Social Science, 10(5&6): 407–411. DOI: 10.36537/IJASS/10.5&;6/407-411
    Back to article
  39. 39Kuroda, R, Lopez, M, Sasaki, J and Settecase, M. 2019. The digital gender gap. (Policy Brief, W20 Japan 2019) EY. GSM Association.
    Back to article
  40. 40Kye, B, Han, N, Kim, E, Park, Y and Jo, S. 2021. Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
    Back to article
  41. 41Lee, K. 2019. Understanding the gender digital divide in developing countries: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 36: 13–23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585318301509.
    Back to article
  42. 42Li, L. 2020. Education supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4): 579–592. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2702
    Back to article
  43. 43Li, P and Lan, YJ. 2022. Digital Language Learning (DLL): Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism, 25(3): 361–378. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728921000353
    Back to article
  44. 44Ly, S, Saadé, R and Morin, D. 2017. Immersive learning: Using a web-based learning tool in a Phd course to enhance the learning experience. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 16: 227–246. DOI: 10.28945/3732
    Back to article
  45. 45Mare, A. 2021. Addressing digital and innovation gender divide: Perspectives from Zimbabwe. Entrepreneurship, technology commercialisation, and innovation policy in Africa, 33–54. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58240-1_3
    Back to article
  46. 46Martínez-Bravo, MC, Sádaba-Chalezquer, C and Serrano-Puche, J. 2021. Meta-marco de la alfabetización digital: Análisis comparado de marcos de competencias del Siglo XXI. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 2021(79): 76–110. DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2021-1508
    Back to article
  47. 47Martínez-Cantos, JL and Castaño, C. 2017. La brecha digital de género y la escasez de mujeres en las profesiones TIC. Panorama Social, 25: 49–65. https://www.funcas.es/wp-content/uploads/Migracion/Articulos/FUNCAS_PS/025art05.pdf.
    Back to article
  48. 48Masanet, M-J, Pires, F and Gómez-Puertas, L. 2021. Riesgos de la brecha digital de género entre los y las adolescentes. Profesional de la Informacion, 30(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2021.ene.12
    Back to article
  49. 49Masdoki, M and Din, R. 2021. Teaching 4.0 competency in higher learning institutions: A systematic mapping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10). DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.20.10.12
    Back to article
  50. 50Mateus, DL, Mangue, MV and Ortiz-Repiso, V. 2022. La alfabetización digital de mujeres hacia la inclusión digital y el cumplimento de la agenda 2030: Una comparación entre las políticas públicas de inclusión digital en Mozambique y España. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 27(2): 320–354. DOI: 10.1590/1981-5344/40004
    Back to article
  51. 51Matsumoto-Royo, K, Ramírez-Montoya, MS and Conget, P. 2021. Opportunities to develop lifelong learning tendencies in practice-based teacher education: Getting ready for education 4.0. Future Internet, 13(11). DOI: 10.3390/fi13110292
    Back to article
  52. 52Meta. 2022. Meta immersive learning. Create, learn and grow in the metaverse. https://about.facebook.com/immersive-learning/.
    Back to article
  53. 53Miranda, J, Navarrete, C, Noguez, J, Molina-Espinosa, JM, Ramírez-Montoya, MS, Navarro-Tuch, SA, Bustamante-Bello, MR, Rosas-Fernández, JB and Molina, A. 2021. The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 93. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278
    Back to article
  54. 54Nguyen, T. 2023. The 2023 Gartner Emerging Technologies and Trends Impact Radar shows product leaders where to capitalize on market opportunities. Gartner Inc. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/4-emerging-technologies-you-need-to-know-about?utm_medium=socialyutm_source=linkedinyutm_campaign=SM_GB_YOY_GTR_SOC_SF1_SM-SWGyutm_content=ysf263823822=1.
    Back to article
  55. 55Ozdamar-Keskin, N, Zeynep Ozata, F, Banar, K and Royle, K. 2015. Examining digital literacy competences and learning habits of open and distance learners. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1): 74–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105611.pdf. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/6140
    Back to article
  56. 56Pacheco, X and Rosales, E. 2022. TIC en la educación en contextos de disrupción tecnológica. Reciamuc, 6(1): 139–148. https://reciamuc.com/index.php/RECIAMUC/article/view/770/1153. DOI: 10.26820/reciamuc/6.(1).enero.2022.139-148
    Back to article
  57. 57Park, S and Kim, S. 2022. Identifying world types to deliver gameful experiences for sustainable learning in the metaverse. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). DOI: 10.3390/su14031361
    Back to article
  58. 58Pedraza, CI. 2021. La brecha digital de género como vértice de las desigualdades de las mujeres en el contexto de la pandemia por Covid-19. LOGOS Revista de Filosofía, 136(136): 9–22. DOI: 10.26457/lrf.v136i136.2873
    Back to article
  59. 59Peláez-Sánchez, IC, George Reyes, CE and Glasserman-Morales, LD. 2023. Gender digital divide in education 4.0: A systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion. Future in Educational Research. DOI: 10.1002/fer3.16
    Back to article
  60. 60Purwanto, A, Fahmi, K and Cahyono, Y. 2023. The benefits of using social media in the learning process of students in the digital literacy era and the education 4.0 era. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 2(2): 1–7. DOI: 10.4444/jisma.v2i2.296
    Back to article
  61. 61Qazi, A and Mujtaba, G. 2019. Digital gender divide: A comparison of women’s online behavior in Pakistan and the UK. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(2): 70–91. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1577221
    Back to article
  62. 62Radianti, J, Majchrzak, TA, Fromm, J and Wohlgenannt, I. 2020. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
    Back to article
  63. 63Radoff, J. 7 April 2021. The metaverse value chain. Medium [online]. https://medium.com/building-the-metaverse/the-metaverse-value-chain-afcf9e09e3a7.
    Back to article
  64. 64Rahma, RA, Sucipto, S, Affriyenni, Y and Widyaswari, M. 2021. Cybergogy as a digital media to facilitate the learning style of millennial college students. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2): 223–235. DOI: 10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5691
    Back to article
  65. 65Rai, A. 2019. Digital divide: How do women in South Asia respond? International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLC), 10(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.4018/IJDLDC.2019010101
    Back to article
  66. 66Ramírez-Montoya, MS, Castillo-Martínez, IM, Sanabria-ZJ and Miranda, J. 2022. Complex thinking in the framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation—A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1): 4. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc8010004
    Back to article
  67. 67Ramírez-Montoya, MS, McGreal, R and Obiageli-Agbu, JF. 2022. Horizontes digitales complejos en el futuro de la educación 4.0: Luces desde las recomendaciones de UNESCO. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 25(2): 09–21. DOI: 10.5944/ried.25.2.33843
    Back to article
  68. 68Revuelta, FI and Pedrera, MI. 2020. Retos y evidencias en la investigación con videojuegos en educación. Ediciones Octaedro, S. L.
    Back to article
  69. 69Rienties, B, Ferguson, R, Gonda, D, Hajdin, G, Herodotou, C, Iniesto, F, Llorens Garcia, A, Muccini, H, Sargent, J, Virkus, S and Isidori, MV. 2023. Education 4.0 in higher education and computer science: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education (Early Access). DOI: 10.1002/cae.22643
    Back to article
  70. 70Rocha Estrada, F, Ruiz-Ramirez, A, George-Reyes, C and Glasserman-Morales, L. 2022. Evaluation of a virtual campus adapted to WebVR Spaces: Assessments of teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 7: 918125. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.918125
    Back to article
  71. 71Rodríguez, MR and Jiménez, R. 2020. Inclusión digital de las mujeres en las políticas españolas de la sociedad de la información. Athenea Digital. Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social, 20(2): 1–26. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/556613.
    Back to article
  72. 72Rodríguez Portes, DL. 2018. Brecha digital de género entre estudiantes de la pucese. Rev. Hallazgos21, 3(3). https://revistas.pucese.edu.ec/hallazgos21/article/view/311/216.
    Back to article
  73. 73Rosalina, D, Yuliari, K, Setianingsih, D and Rizqi, MZ. 2021. Factors influencing the digital literacy competency of college students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. IJEBA: International Journal of Economics, Business and Applications, 6(2): 1–16. DOI: 10.31258/ijeba.6.2.81-92
    Back to article
  74. 74Rozo-García, F. 2020. Revisión de las tecnologías presentes en la industria 4.0. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 19(2): 177–191. DOI: 10.18273/revuin.v19n2-2020019
    Back to article
  75. 75Sabando, AV. 2021. Educación 4.0 y su impacto en el sistema educativo durante la pandemia y post pandemia Covid 19 en el Ecuador. Sinergias educativas, 7(1). http://portal.amelica.org/ameli/jatsRepo/382/3822817007/index.html.
    Back to article
  76. 76Sandoval, CH. 2021. Alfabetización digital como puente de exclusión social poscovid-19. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 11(1): 120–129. DOI: 10.37843/rted.v11i1.200
    Back to article
  77. 77Sarango-Lapo, CP, Mena, J and Ramírez-Montoya, MS. 2021. Evidence-based educational innovation model linked to digital information competence in the framework of education 4.0. Sustainability, 13(18): 10034. DOI: 10.3390/su131810034
    Back to article
  78. 78Sepúlveda, P and Morrison, A. 2020. Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4): 587–607. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981
    Back to article
  79. 79Singh, A and Pathak, RK. 2020. Gender digital divide in India: A study of socioeconomic factors. International Journal of Information Management, 52: 102049. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.002
    Back to article
  80. 80Stromberg, Z, Phelps, C, Smith, J and Moro, C. 2021. Teaching with disruptive technology: The use of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality (HoloLens) for disease education. In: Rea, PM (ed.), Biomedical Visualisation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1317. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61125-5_8
    Back to article
  81. 81Sumarsono, S. 2020. The paradigms of heutagogy and cybergogy in the transdisciplinary perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 52(3): 172–182. DOI: 10.23887/jpp.v52i3.22882
    Back to article
  82. 82Tajudin, MN, Suhaimi, NA, Adnan, M and Puteh, M. 2020. Promoting transformative mathematical learning through heutagogy, paragogy, and cybergogy approaches. Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(10): 481–497. DOI: 10.48080/jae.v17i10.4374
    Back to article
  83. 83Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C. 2010. Putting the human back in “human research methodology”: The researcher in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(4): 271–277. DOI: 10.1177/1558689810382532
    Back to article
  84. 84Trivedi, A. 2018. Digital divide and gender: A study of rural India. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 10(1): 44–61. http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/535.
    Back to article
  85. 85United Nations. 2020. Policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on women. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/policy_brief_on_covid_impact_on_women_9_apr_2020_updated.pdf.
    Back to article
  86. 86Vázquez, J, Cruz, M and Carlos, M. 2022. Social entrepreneurship and complex thinking: A bibliometric study. Sustainability, 14: 13187. DOI: 10.3390/su142013187
    Back to article
  87. 87Viladrich, C, Angulo-Brunet, A and Doval, E. 2017. A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Annals of Psychology, 33(3): 755–782. DOI: 10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
    Back to article
  88. 88Vodovozov, V, Zoja, R and Petlenkov, E. 2021. Challenges of active learning in view of integrated engineering education. Education Sciences, 11(2): 1–14. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11020043
    Back to article
  89. 89Wasilah, L, Insap, P and Sorour, S. 2021. Study on the influencing factors of the flexibility of university IT management in Education 4.0. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 30(2): 132–153. DOI: 10.1504/IJIL.2021.117219
    Back to article
  90. 90Wong, B and Kemp, PEJ. 2018. Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3): 301–316. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2017.1325443
    Back to article
  91. 91World Bank Group. 2020. Women, business and the law 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33738.
    Back to article
  92. 92Xia, R. 2023. Examining the optimal option for gender equality education in the digital era. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 12: 217–223. DOI: 10.54097/ehss.v12i.7639
    Back to article
  93. 93Zhang, P, Wang, L and Liu, C. 2020. The empowerment of singleton daughters: Exploring the gender digital divide among Chinese college students. Information Technology and People, 34(5): 1401–1418. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0350
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.833 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 25, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 29, 2023
Published on: Feb 15, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
communicative literacy,
educational innovation,
gender digital divide,
complex thinking,
immersive environments

© 2024 Carlos Enrique George-Reyes, Iris Cristina Peláez-Sánchez, Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2024 (2024): Issue 1Next article