Have a personal or library account? Click to login
JIME Virtual Special Collection – 2012 to 2022: The Decade of the MOOC Cover

JIME Virtual Special Collection – 2012 to 2022: The Decade of the MOOC

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2022 (2022): Issue 1
By: Katy Jordan and  Fereshte Goshtasbpour  
Open Access
|May 2022

References

  1. 1Adam, T. 2020. Between social justice and decolonisation: Exploring South African MOOC designers’ conceptualisations and approaches to addressing injustices. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.557
    Back to article
  2. 2Bali, M, Cronin, C and Jhangiani, RS. 2020. Framing Open Educational Practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.565
    Back to article
  3. 3Beaven, T, Comas-Quinn, A, Hauck, M, del os Arcos, B and Lewis, T. 2013. The Open Translation MOOC: Creating online communities to transcend linguistic barriers. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3: 18–32. DOI: 10.5334/2013-18
    Back to article
  4. 4Beer, N. 2019. Designing a rubric to measure elements of transformative learning in online learning: A case study of a FutureLearn MOOC. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.506
    Back to article
  5. 5Brown, M. 2021. What are the main trends in online learning? A helicopter view of possible futures. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2): 118–143. http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/605
    Back to article
  6. 6Conde Gafaro, B. 2019. Exploring self-regulated language learning with MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.527
    Back to article
  7. 7Corbeil, J, Khan, B and Corbeil, M. 2019. MOOCs revisited: Still transformative or passing fad? Asian Journal of University Education, 14(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207738.pdf
    Back to article
  8. 8Dalsgaard, C and Gislev, T. 2019. Embracing dropouts in MOOCs: Exploring potentials of invisible learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.498
    Back to article
  9. 9Daniel, J. 2012. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. DOI: 10.5334/2012-18
    Back to article
  10. 10EdSurge. 8 September 2015. Udacity, Coursera and edX now claim over 24 million students. [online]. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-09-08-udacity-coursera-and-edx-now-claim-over-24-million-students (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  11. 11Estebas-Vilaplana, E and Solans, M. 2020. The role of a pronunciation LMOOC in higher education studies. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.589
    Back to article
  12. 12Ferguson, R, Scanlon, E and Harris, L. 2016. Developing a strategic approach to MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.439
    Back to article
  13. 13Hillaire, G, Iniesto, F and Rienties, B. 2019. Humanising text-to-speech through emotional expression in online courses. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.519
    Back to article
  14. 14Hodge, R. 2016. Adapting a MOOC for research: Lessons learned from the first presentation of literature and mental health: Reading for wellbeing. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.428
    Back to article
  15. 15HolonIQ. 2020. The MOOC decade. 380 million students later. HolonIQ [online]. https://www.holoniq.com/notes/the-mooc-decade.-380-million-students-later./
    Back to article
  16. 16Iniesto, F, McAndrew, P, Minocha, S and Coughlan, T. 2016. Accessibility of MOOCs: Understanding the provider perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.430
    Back to article
  17. 17Iniesto, F, Tabuenca, B, Rodrigo, C and Tovar, E. 2021. Challenges to achieving a more inclusive and sustainable open education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.679
    Back to article
  18. 18Lambert, SR. 2015. Reluctant mathematician: Skills-based MOOC scaffolds wide range of learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.bb
    Back to article
  19. 19León Urrutia, M, Fielding, S and White, S. 2016. Professional development through MOOCs in higher education institutions: Challenges and opportunities for PhD students working as mentors. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.427
    Back to article
  20. 20Levine, A. 2013. A MOOC or not a MOOC- DS106 questions the form. Alan Levine’s Pubs [online]. https://cogdogpapers.trubox.ca/2013/a-mooc-or-not-a-mooc-ds106-questions-the-form/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  21. 21Lockridge, RL, Levine, A and Funes, M. 2014. A DS106 thing happened on the way to the 3M tech forum. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2: 1–8. DOI: 10.5334/jime.ag
    Back to article
  22. 22Meri-Yilan, S. 2020. The online interface and social inclusion: A MOOC study in Turkey. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.558
    Back to article
  23. 23Miyazoe, T and Anderson, T. 2013. Interaction equivalency in an OER, MOOCS and informal learning era. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2. DOI: 10.5334/2013-09
    Back to article
  24. 24Okada, A and Sherborne, T. 2018. Equipping the next generation for responsible research and innovation with Open Educational Resources, Open Courses, Open Communities and Open Schooling: An impact case study in Brazil. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.482
    Back to article
  25. 25Pappano, L. 2012. The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=1 (Last accessed:13 April 2022)
    Back to article
  26. 26Read, T and Barcena, E. 2021. The role of activeness for potentiating learning in LMOOCs for vulnerable groups. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.628
    Back to article
  27. 27Rodés, V, Porta, M, Garófalo, L and Enríquez, CR. 2021. Teacher education in the emergency: A MOOC-inspired teacher professional development strategy grounded in critical digital pedagogy and pedagogy of care. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.657
    Back to article
  28. 28Scanlon, E, McAndrew, P and O’Shea, T. 2015. Designing for educational technology to enhance the experience of learners in distance education: How Open Educational Resources, learning design and Moocs are influencing learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.al
    Back to article
  29. 29Shah, D. 2014. MOOCs in 2014: Breaking down the numbers. EdSurge [online]. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2014-12-26-moocs-in-2014-breaking-down-the-numbers (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  30. 30Shah, D. 2015. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2015. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  31. 31Shah, D. 2016. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2016. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2016/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  32. 32Shah, D. 2017. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2017. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  33. 33Shah, D. 2018. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2018. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2018/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  34. 34Shah, D. 2019. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2019. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2019/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  35. 35Shah, D. 2020. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2020. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2020/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  36. 36Shah, D. 2021a. By the numbers: MOOCS in 2021. Class Central [online]. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2021/ (Last accessed:13 April 2022).
    Back to article
  37. 37Shah, D. 2021b. A decade of MOOCs: A review of stats and trends for large-scale online courses in 2021. EdSurge [online]. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2021-12-28-a-decade-of-moocs-a-review-of-stats-and-trends-for-large-scale-online-courses-in-2021 (Last accessed:11 April 2022)
    Back to article
  38. 38Sharples, M, Delgado Kloos, C, Dimitriadis, Y, Garlatti, S and Specht, M. 2015. Mobile and accessible learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.ai
    Back to article
  39. 39United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations [online]. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (Last accessed:14 April 2022)
    Back to article
  40. 40Weller, M. 2015. MOOCs and the Silicon valley narrative. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.am
    Back to article
  41. 41White, S and White, S. 2016. Learning designers in the ‘Third Space’: The socio-technical construction of MOOCs and their relationship to educator and learning designer roles in HE. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.429
    Back to article
  42. 42Xu, M, Deng, J and Zhao, T. 2020. On status quo, problems, and future development of translation and interpreting MOOCs in China—A mixed methods approach. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1: 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/jime.551
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.757 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2022
Published on: May 25, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Massive open online courses,
MOOC,
open education,
online education

© 2022 Katy Jordan, Fereshte Goshtasbpour, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 2022 (2022): Issue 1Next article