Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Self-Regulation of Learning and the Co-Design of Personalized Learning Pathways in Higher Education: A Theoretical Model Approach Cover

Self-Regulation of Learning and the Co-Design of Personalized Learning Pathways in Higher Education: A Theoretical Model Approach

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2022 (2022): Issue 1
By: Sofía Villatoro Moral and  Barbara de-Benito Crosseti  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. 1Anderson, T and Shattuck, J. 2012. Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1): 16–25. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
    Back to article
  2. 2Bain, K and Zimmerman, J. 2009. Understanding great teaching. Peer Review, 11(2).
    Back to article
  3. 3Barroso, J, Cabero-Almenara, J and Vázquez, A. 2012. La formación desde la perspectiva de los entornos personales de aprendizaje (PLE). Apertura, 4(1). DOI: 10.21071/edmetic.v2i1.2857
    Back to article
  4. 4Bovill, C. 2017. A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
    Back to article
  5. 5Bovill, C. 2020. Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6): 1023–1037. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
    Back to article
  6. 6Bovill, C, Felten, P and Cook-Sather, A. 2014. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (2): Practical guidance for academic staff and academic developers. International Consortium for Educational Development Conference. June. Available at www.iced2014.se/proceedings/1146_BovillFeltenCook-Sather.pdf.
    Back to article
  7. 7Cabero-Almenara, J, Arancibia, ML and Del Prete, A. 2019. Technical and didactic knowledge of the moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1). DOI: 10.7821/naer.2019.1.327
    Back to article
  8. 8Cabero-Almenara, J, Barroso, J, Palacios, A and Llorente, C. 2020. Marcos de competencias digitales para docentes universitarios: Su evaluación a través del coeficiente competencia experta. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 23(3). DOI: 10.6018/reifop.414501
    Back to article
  9. 9Cabero-Almenara, J and Llorente, M. 2013. La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC). Eduweb, 7(2).
    Back to article
  10. 10Coffey, JW, Cañas, AJ, Hill, G, Carff, R, Reichherzer, T and Suri, N. 2003. Knowledge modeling and the creation of El-Tech: A performance support and training system for electronic technicians. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(4). DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00089-7
    Back to article
  11. 11Darder, A, De Benito, B, Salinas, J and Cañas, A. 2010. Construcción y validación de un itinerario de aprendizaje sobre diseño y producción de materiales didácticos multimedia. In 4th Concept Mapping Conference, October 5–7.
    Back to article
  12. 12Daura, T. 2013. El contexto como factor del aprendizaje autorregulado en la educación superior. Educación y Educadores, 16(1): 109–125. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=83428614006. DOI: 10.5294/edu.2013.16.1.7
    Back to article
  13. 13De-Benito, B, Darder, A and Salinas, J. 2012. Los itinerarios de aprendizaje mediante mapas conceptuales como recurso para la representación del conocimiento. Edutec: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 39. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2012.39.372
    Back to article
  14. 14De-Benito, B, Moreno, J and Villatoro, S. 2020. Entornos tecnológicos en el codiseño de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje en la enseñanza superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 74: 73–93. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1843
    Back to article
  15. 15De-Benito, B and Salinas, JM. 2016. La investigación basada en diseño en tecnología educativa. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación En Tecnología Educativa, 260631. DOI: 10.6018/riite2016/260631
    Back to article
  16. 16De-Benito, B, Salinas, J and Darder, A. 2013. Itinerarios en la creación de entornos enseñanza-aprendizaje significativos. Informe de Recerca, 5. http://ibdigital.uib.es/greenstone/collect/IRIEInformesRecercaVolums/index/assoc/05_Itine.dir/05_Itinerarios.pdf.
    Back to article
  17. 17De los Santos, PJ, Moreno, AJ, Marín, JA and Costa, RS. 2020. The term equity in education: A literature review with scientific mapping in Web of Science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10): 3526. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103526
    Back to article
  18. 18Díaz, JP, Ruiz, AK and Egüez, C. 2021. Impacto de las TIC: Desafíos y oportunidades de la educación superior frente al COVID-19. Revista Científica UISRAEL, 8(2): 113–134. DOI: 10.35290/rcui.v8n2.2021.448
    Back to article
  19. 19EDUCAUSE. 2020. 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/3/2020_horizon_report_pdf.pdf.
    Back to article
  20. 20Fernández, R and Alhama, L. 2018. Interdisciplinary experimental learning exercise between graphic and interior design.: How to build and experience, approximations to the visual realm and the physical space. In: Rosa, CJ and Jiménez, AGM (eds.), Educational innovation in architecture and engineering: Advances in final projects and thesis. Málaga: RU Books. pp. 196–201. Available at https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/extart?codigo=6775920.
    Back to article
  21. 21Gros, B. 2019. La investigación sobre el diseño participativo de entornos digitales de aprendizaje. Universidad de Barcelona, 1–70. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24298.06087
    Back to article
  22. 22Gros, B and Noguera, I. 2013. Mirando el futuro: Evolución de las tendencias tecnopedagógicas en educación superior. Campus Virtuales, 2(2).
    Back to article
  23. 23Hernández, RM. 2017. Impacto de las TIC en la educación: Retos y perspectivas. Propósitos y Representaciones, 5(1). DOI: 10.20511/pyr2017.v5n1.149
    Back to article
  24. 24Jovanović, J, Gašević, D, Dawson, S, Pardo, A and Mirriahi, N. 2017. Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 33. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
    Back to article
  25. 25Kinzie, J and Kuh, G. 2017. Reframing student success in college: Advancing know-what and know-how. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(3): 19–27. DOI: 10.1080/00091383.2017.1321429
    Back to article
  26. 26Lannoy, A and Procaccia, M. 2001. L’utilisation du jugement d’experts en sûreté de fonctionnement. Paris: Editions TEC & DOC.
    Back to article
  27. 27Magolda, MBB and Astin, AW. 1993. What “doesn’t” matter in college? What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. Educational Researcher, 22(8): 32. DOI: 10.2307/1176821
    Back to article
  28. 28McCombs, BL. 1989. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In: Zimmerman, BJ and Schunk, DH (eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Springer series in cognitive development. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 51–83. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_3
    Back to article
  29. 29Minguillón, J, Mor, E, Santanach, F and Ortiz, LG. 2005. Personalización del proceso de aprendizaje usando learning objects reutilizables. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 1–10.
    Back to article
  30. 30Mor, Y, Ferguson, R and Wasson, B. 2015. Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2). DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12273
    Back to article
  31. 31Moreno, A-J, Soler, R, Marín, JA and López, J. 2021. Flipped learning y buenas prácticas docentes en educación secundaria. Comunicar, 29(68).
    Back to article
  32. 32OECD. 2019. OECD Skills Outlook 2019. DOI: 10.1787/df80bc12-en
    Back to article
  33. 33Panadero, E and Alonso-Tapia, J. 2014. ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Revisión del modelo cíclico de Zimmerman sobre autorregulación del aprendizaje. Anales de Psicologia, 30(2). DOI: 10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
    Back to article
  34. 34Pastor, X, Lozano, R and Gros, B. (coordinadores.) 2017. El aprendizaje basado en la indagación y el codiseño experiencia aplicada en el grado de ingeniería biomédica cuadernos de docencia universitaria. Barcelona: Ediciones OCTAEDRO. Available at www.octaedro.com.
    Back to article
  35. 35Reeves, TC. 2006. Design research from the technology perspective. In: van den Akker, J, Gravemeijer, K, McKenney, S and Nieveen, N (eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge. pp. 86–109.
    Back to article
  36. 36Richey, RC and Klein, JD. 2014. Design and development research. In: Spector, JM, Merrill, MD, Elen, J and Bishop, MJ (eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer. pp. 141–150.
    Back to article
  37. 37Robertson, M and Al-Zahrani, A. 2012. Self-efficacy and ICT integration into initial teacher education in Saudi Arabia: Matching policy with practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 287: 1136–1151. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.793
    Back to article
  38. 38Salinas, J. 2000. El rol del profesorado en el mundo digital. En: del Carmen, L (ed.), Simposio sobre la formación inicial de los profesionales de la educación. Barcelona: Universitat de Girona. pp. 305–320.
    Back to article
  39. 39Salinas, J and De-Benito, B. 2020. Construction of personalized learning pathways through mixed methods. Comunicar, 28(65): 99–111. DOI: 10.3916/C65-2020-03
    Back to article
  40. 40Sanders, EB-N and Stappers, PJ. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1). DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
    Back to article
  41. 41Sargent, J and Casey, A. 2020. Flipped learning, pedagogy and digital technology: Establishing consistent practice to optimise lesson time. European Physical Education Review, 26(1). DOI: 10.1177/1356336X19826603
    Back to article
  42. 42Schunk, DH and Zimmerman, BJ. (eds.) 1994. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Back to article
  43. 43UNESCO. 2020. Covid-19 impact on education data: COVID-19 education disruption and response. https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response.
    Back to article
  44. 44Vidal, R. 2006. The future workshop: Democratic problem solving. Journal of Economic Analysis Working Papers (EAWP), 5: 1–25.
    Back to article
  45. 45Villatoro, S and De-Benito, B. 2021. An approach to co-design and self-regulated learning in technological environments. Systematic review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2). DOI: 10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
    Back to article
  46. 46Villatoro, S and De-Benito, B. 2022. La inclusión del uso de itinerarios de aprendizaje en educación superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 79: 95–113. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2022.79.2365
    Back to article
  47. 47Viveros, S and Sánchez, L. 2018. Los modelos pedagógicos y los factores de desarrollo social, tecnológico y científico que los determinan: Un análisis del contexto colombiano. Conrado, 14(Supl. 1): 318–326. Available at http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S199086442018000500318&lng=es&tlng=es.
    Back to article
  48. 48Zheng, J, Xing, W, Zhu, G, Chen, G, Zhao, H and Xie, C. 2020. Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers and Education, 143. Available at https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071284409&doi=10.1016%2Fj.compedu.2019.103669&partnerID=40&md5=0fa2d253de47363646e284542cf03135.
    Back to article
  49. 49Zimmerman, BJ. 2001. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In: Zimmerman, BJ and Schunk, DH (eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. pp. 1–37.
    Back to article
  50. 50Zimmerman, BJ and Moylan, AR. 2009. Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In: Hacker, DJ, Dunlosky, J and Graesser, AC (eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. Routledge. pp. 299–315.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.749 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2022
Published on: Sep 12, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Learning Co-design,
Personalized Learning Pathways,
Higher Education,
Self-regulated Learning

© 2022 Sofía Villatoro Moral, Barbara de-Benito Crosseti, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2022 (2022): Issue 1Next article