Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping “A Situation of Open Education”: Using Collaborative Relational Mapping to Explore Motivations and Constraint Among Open Educators Cover

Mapping “A Situation of Open Education”: Using Collaborative Relational Mapping to Explore Motivations and Constraint Among Open Educators

By: Tanya Elias  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. 1Anderson, T and Dron, J. 2011. Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3): 8097. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  2. 2Baggaley, J. 2012. Harmonizing global education. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203817636
  3. 3Bayne, S, Knox, J and Ross, J. 2015. Editorial: Open education: The need for a critical approach. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(3): 247250. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1065272
  4. 4Clarke, AE. 2003. Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4): 553576. DOI: 10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
  5. 5Clarke, AE, Friese, C and Washburn, RS. 2018. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. 6Cronin, C. 2017. Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(5): 1534. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
  7. 7Edwards, R. 2015. Knowledge infrastructures and the inscrutability of openness in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3). DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1006131
  8. 8Elias, T. 2019. Troubling “technologies”: Exploring the global learning XPRIZE using the frameworks of Skinner and Foucault. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 6(1): 1.
  9. 9Ellingson, LL. 2014. “The truth must dazzle gradually”: Enriching relationship research using a crystallization framework. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(4): 442450. DOI: 10.1177/0265407514523553
  10. 10Franklin, U. 1999. The real world of technology. Toronto, Canada: House of Anansi Press.
  11. 11Garrison, DR. 1997. Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1): 1833. DOI: 10.1177/074171369704800103
  12. 12Garrison, DR and Anderson, TD. 1999. Avoiding the industrialization of research universities: Big and little distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2): 4863. DOI: 10.1080/08923649909527024
  13. 13Lambert, SR. 2018. Changing our (dis) course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3): 225244.
  14. 14Kanuka, H. 2008. Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 91.
  15. 15Kanuka, H and Conrad, D. 2003. The name of the game: Why “distance education” says it all. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(4): 385.
  16. 16Koseoglu, S and Bozkurt, A. 2018. An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4): 441461. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
  17. 17Knox, J. 2014. Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2): 164177. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
  18. 18Lee, K. 2015. Discourses and realities of online higher education: A history of [discourses of] online education in Canada’s Open University. University of Toronto (Canada).
  19. 19Mackintosh, W, McGreal, R and Taylor, J. 2011. Open education resources (OER) for assessment and credit for students project: Towards a logic model and plan for action. Athabasca University.
  20. 20Mackness, J and Bell, F. 2015. Rhizo14: A rhizomatic learning cMOOC in sunlight and in shade. Open Praxis, 7(1): 2538. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.173
  21. 21Nascimbeni, F and Burgos, D. 2016. In search for the open educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to increase openness adoption among university educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 17(6): 117. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2736
  22. 22Peters, O. 1994. Otto Peters on distance education: The industrialization of teaching and learning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  23. 23Rosecrance, RN. 1999. The rise of the virtual state: Wealth and power in the coming century. New York: Basic Books.
  24. 24Stracke, CM, Downes, S, Conole, G, Burgos, D and Nascimbeni, F. 2019. Are MOOCs open educational resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs. Open Praxis, 11(4): 331341. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1010
  25. 25Tomasko, RM. 2006. Bigger isn’t always better: The new mindset for real business growth. ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands: Amacom Books.
  26. 26Tur, G, Havemann, L, Marsh, D, Keefer, JM and Nascimbeni, F. 2020. Becoming an open educator: Towards an open threshold framework. Research in Learning Technology, 28. DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2338
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.671 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 12, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2021
Published on: Dec 13, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Tanya Elias, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.