References
- 1Agarwal, A. 2016. The global MOOC moment: Massive open online courses, though controversial, are improving lives all over the world. US News. Available at
www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-02-01/the-global-mooc-moment . - 2Aimin, L. 2013. The study of second language acquisition under socio-cultural theory. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(5): 162–167. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-5-3
- 3Bali, M. 2020. Pedagogy of care: Covid-19 edition. Reflecting Allowed (BLOG), Available at
https://blog.mahabali.me/educational-technology-2/pedagogy-of-care-covid-19-edition/ . - 4Barcena, E, Martín-Monje, E and Read, T. 2015. Potentiating the human dimension in Language MOOCs. Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs, EMOOCs, 2015, 46–54. Available at:
https://bit.ly/3wSyCIi . - 5Barcena, E, Read, T and Sedano, B. 2020. An approximation to inclusive language in LMOOCs based on appraisal theory. Open Linguistics, 6(1): 38–67. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2020-0003
- 6Barkanyi, Z. 2021. Motivation, self-efficacy beliefs and speaking anxiety in language MOOCs. ReCALL – Researching Massive Open Online Courses for language teaching and learning, 33(2): 143–160. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344021000033
- 7Basco, LM and Han, SH. 2016. Self-esteem, motivation, and anxiety of Korean university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(6): 1069–1078. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.0706.02
- 8Brown, HD. 1994. Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- 9Castrillo, MD and Sedano, B. 2021. Joining forces towards social inclusion: Language MOOC design for refugees and migrants through the lens of Maker culture. CALICO Journal, 38(1): 79–102. DOI: 10.1558/cj.40900
- 10Compton, LK. 2009. Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1): 73–99. DOI: 10.1080/09588220802613831
- 11Cortes, KE. 2004. Are refugees different from economic immigrants? Some empirical evidence on the heterogeneity of immigrant groups in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2): 465–480. DOI: 10.1162/003465304323031058
- 12Daniel, J. 2012. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. DOI: 10.5334/2012-18
- 13Dávila, LT. 2017. Newly arrived immigrant youth in Sweden negotiate identity, language & literacy. System, 67: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.04.001
- 14de Waard, I, Gallagher, MS, Zelezny-Green, R, Czerniewicz, L, Downes, S, Kukulska-Hulme, A and Willems, J. 2014. Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. In Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, 33–42. Available here:
https://bit.ly/3iaiopz . - 15Eurobarometer (Special). 2006. Europeans and their Languages. European Commission.
- 16Godwin-Jones, R. 2018. Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2): 8–27.
- 17Goodridge, P. 2017. Second-language acquisition and motivation: A literature review. The Journal of Undergraduate Research at the University of Tennessee, 8(1): 8.
- 18Kothari, CR. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
- 19Lantolf, JP, Thorne, SL and Poehner, ME. 2015. Sociocultural theory and second language development. Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, 1: 207–226.
- 20Marcos-Llinás, M and Garau, MJ. 2009. Effects of language anxiety on three proficiency-level courses of Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign language annals, 42(1): 94–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01010.x
- 21Martin, JR and White, PJ. 2005. The language of evaluation appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- 22Martín-Monje, E and Barcena, E. (eds.) 2014. Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open. DOI: 10.2478/9783110420067
- 23Marzouki, OF, Idrissi, MK and Bennani, S. 2017. Effects of social constructivist mobile learning environments on knowledge acquisition: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(1). DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v11i1.5982
- 24Nusbaum, EA. 2013. Vulnerable to exclusion: The place for segregated education within conceptions of inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(12): 1295–1311. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2013.826292
- 25Peirce, BN. 1995. Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL quarterly, 29(1): 9–31. DOI: 10.2307/3587803
- 26Read, T, Sedano, B and Barcena, E. 2018. Tailoring language MOOC design for migrants and refugees. In Technological Innovation for Specialized Linguistic Domains: Languages for Digital Lives and Cultures Proceedings of TISLID, 18, 383–396. Mauritius:
Éditions universitaires européennes . - 27Robson, C. 2002. Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
- 28Sallam, M, Martín-Monje, E and Li, Y. 2020. Research trends in language MOOC studies: A systematic review of the published literature (2012–2018). Computer Assisted Language Learning. Available at
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668 . DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668 - 29Sam, SIFL, Rustamova, AE, Qudratova, DR and Kudratov, LF. 2020. Psychological factors of learning foreign language pronunciation. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2): Part II. 22–24.
- 30Schreiber-Barsch, S. 2018.
Global citizenship education and globalism . In The palgrave handbook of global citizenship and education, 113–131. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5_8 - 31Shimray, SR and Ramaiah, CK. 2019. Use of internet through mobile devices: A survey. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 56(2): 100–105. DOI: 10.17821/srels/2019/v56i2/141631
- 32Silver, L, Smith, A, Johnson, C, Taylor, K, Jiang, J, Monica, A and Rainie, L. 2019. Use of smartphones and social media is common across most emerging economies. Pew Research Center. Available at
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2019/03/PI_2019.03.07_Mobile-Connectivity_FINAL.pdf . - 33Su, Y, Zheng, C, Liang, JC and Tsai, CC. 2018. Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.3548
- 34Suhendi, A. 2018. Constructivist learning theory: The contribution to foreign language learning and teaching. KnE Social Sciences, 87–95. DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921
- 35Traxler, J, Barcena, E and Read, T. 2019.
Refugees from MENA learning languages: Progress, principles and proposals . In: Reinders, H, Coombe, C, Littlejohn, A and Tafazoli, D (eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching, 19–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13413-6_2 - 36Tuncer, U. 2009.
How do monolingual and bilingual language learners differ in use of learning strategies while learning a foreign language? Evidences from Mersin University, 852–856. Amsterdam: Elsvier. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.153 - 37van de Pol, J, Volman, M and Beishuizen, J. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3): 271–296. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
- 38Vorobyeva, A. 2018. Language acquisition through massive open online courses (MOOCs): Opportunities and restrictions in educational university environment. XLinguae, 11(2): 136–146. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.11
- 39Wearing, M. 2011. Strengthening youth citizenship and social inclusion practice—The Australian case: Towards rights based and inclusive practice in services for marginalized young people. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4): 534–540. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.012
- 40Yates, L. 2011. Interaction, language learning and social inclusion in early settlement. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4): 457–471. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2011.573068