Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective Cover

Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2020 (2020): Issue 1
By: Maha Bali,  Catherine Cronin and  Rajiv S. Jhangiani  
Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. 1Bali, M. 23 August 2016. I don’t own my domain, I rent it #DoOO. Reflecting allowed [online]. Available from: https://blog.mahabali.me/educational-technology-2/i-dont-own-my-domain-i-rent-it-dooo/.
    Back to article
  2. 2Bali, M. 14 June 2019. The other side of student empowerment in a digital world #FOEcast – join me June 24 to chat. Reflecting allowed [online]. Available from: https://blog.mahabali.me/uncategorized/the-other-side-of-student-empowerment-in-a-digital-world-foecast-join-me-june-24-to-chat/.
    Back to article
  3. 3Bali, M. April 2017. What is open pedagogy anyway? Year of open [online]. Available from: https://www.yearofopen.org/april-open-perspective-what-is-open-pedagogy/.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bali, M and Caines, A. December 2018. A call for promoting ownership, equity, and agency in faculty development via connected learning. The International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-018-0128-8
    Back to article
  5. 5Bali, M, Caines, A, Hogue, RJ, DeWaard, HJ and Friedrich, C. 2019. Intentionally equitable hospitality in hybrid video dialogue: The context of Virtually Connecting. eLearning Mag (special issue). DOI: 10.1145/3329488.3331173.
    Back to article
  6. 6Bali, M, Crawford, M, Jessen, RL, Signorelli, P and Zamora, M. 2015. What makes a cMOOC community endure? Multiple participant perspectives from diverse MOOCs. Educational Media International, 52(2): 100–115. DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2015.1053290
    Back to article
  7. 7Bali, M and Koseoglu, S. 26 August 2016. Self as OER. The Chronicle of Higher Education ProfHacker [online]. Available from: https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/self-as-oer-selfoer/62679.
    Back to article
  8. 8Beckingham, S. 2018. Using Social Media to Learn from Conferences. In: Popovic, C (ed.), Learning from Academic Conferences. Leiden: Brill|Sense. DOI: 10.1163/9789004373013_010
    Back to article
  9. 9Bowles, K. 10 April 2019. A quilt of stars: time, work and open pedagogy. OER19: recentering open [online] Available from: https://oer19.oerconf.org/sessions/welcome-from-the-co-chairs-and-keynote-by-kate-bowles/#gref.
    Back to article
  10. 10Brown, M and Croft, B. 2020. Social annotation and an inclusive praxis for open pedagogy in the college classroom. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1): 8, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.5334/jime.561
    Back to article
  11. 11Burtis, M. 16 August 2016. Making and Breaking Domain of One’s Own: Rethinking the Web in Higher Ed. Hybrid pedagogy [online]. Available from: http://hybridpedagogy.org/making-breaking-rethinking-web-higher-ed/.
    Back to article
  12. 12Cape Town Open Education Declaration. 2007. Cape Town open education declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration.
    Back to article
  13. 13Cronin, C. 2017. Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
    Back to article
  14. 14Cronin, C and MacLaren, I. 2018. Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in open educational practices. Open Praxis, 10(2). DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
    Back to article
  15. 15Czerniewicz, L and Walji, S. 2017. MOOCs, community orientation and reclaiming the social justice agenda. In: de los Arcos, B (ed.), GO-GN: Global OER Graduate Network [online]. Available from http://go-gn.net/webinars/webinar-moocs-community-orientation-and-reclaiming-the-social-justice-agenda/.
    Back to article
  16. 16DeRosa, R and Jhangiani, R. 2017. Open pedagogy. In: Mays, E (ed.), A Guide to Making Open Textbooks with Students. Rebus Community for Open Textbook Creation. PressBooks. Available from: https://press.rebus.community/makingopentextbookswithstudents/.
    Back to article
  17. 17Equity Unbound. Undated. About [online]. Available from: http://unboundeq.creativitycourse.org/about/.
    Back to article
  18. 18Fraser, N. 2005. Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36, Nov/Dec. Available from: https://newleftreview-org.libproxy.aucegypt.edu/issues/II36/articles/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world.
    Back to article
  19. 19Geser, G. (eds.) 2007. Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap 2012. Salzburg, Austria: Salzburg Research & EduMedia Group. Available from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v4i1.295
    Back to article
  20. 20Gilliard, C and Culik, H. 24 May 2016. Digital redlining, access, and privacy. Common sense education [online]. Available from: https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/digital-redlining-access-and-privacy.
    Back to article
  21. 21Greenstein, S and Zhu, F. 2014. Do experts or collective intelligence write with more bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia. White paper, Harvard Business School.
    Back to article
  22. 22Hodgkinson-Williams, CA and Trotter, H. 2018. A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the Global South. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3): 204–224. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/312.
    Back to article
  23. 23Ito, M, Gutiérrez, K, Livingstone, S, Penuel, B, Rhodes, J, Salen, K, Schor, J, Sefton-Green, J and Watkins, C. 2013. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/.
    Back to article
  24. 24Jhangiani, RS. 12 January 2017. Why have students answer questions when they can write them? [online]. Available from https://thatpsychprof.com/why-have-students-answer-questions-when-they-can-write-them/.
    Back to article
  25. 25Jhangiani, RS. 2019. Delivering on the promise of open educational resources: Pitfalls and strategies. In: Zhang, K, Bonk, CJ, Reeves, TC and Reynolds, TH (eds.), MOOCs and open education across emerging economies: Challenges, successes, and opportunities, 56–62. New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780429398919-7
    Back to article
  26. 26Jhangiani, RS and DeRosa, R. 2018. Welcome to the open pedagogy notebook [online]. Available from http://openpedagogy.org/.
    Back to article
  27. 27Kalir, J. 2018. Equity-oriented design in open education. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5): 357–367. DOI: 10.1108/IJILT-06-2018-0070
    Back to article
  28. 28Kalir, J and Perez, F. 2019. The marginal syllabus: Educator learning and web annotation across sociopolitical texts and contexts. In: Reid, A (ed.), Marginalia in modern learning contexts. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6axnk
    Back to article
  29. 29Knox, J. 2013. The limitations of access alone: Moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1): 21–29. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36
    Back to article
  30. 30Koseoglu, S and Bozkurt, A. 2018. An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4): 441–461. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
    Back to article
  31. 31Lambert, SR. 2018. Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). Available from: https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/290/334.
    Back to article
  32. 32Ludemann, PM and McMakin, D. 2014. Perceived helpfulness of peer editing activities: First-year students’ views and writing performance outcomes. Psychology Teaching & Learning, 13: 129–136. DOI: 10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.129
    Back to article
  33. 33Okuno, E. 16 November 2018. Equity doesn’t mean all. FakeQuity [online]. Available from: https://fakequity.com/2018/11/16/equity-doesnt-mean-all/.
    Back to article
  34. 34Paskevicius, M and Irvine, V. 2019. Practicalities of implementing open pedagogy in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 6(23). DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0110-5
    Back to article
  35. 35Reagle, J and Rhue, L. 2011. Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5(2011): 1138–1158. Available from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777.
    Back to article
  36. 36Rikard, A. 10 August 2015. Do I own my domain if you grade it? EdSurge [online]. Available from: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-08-10-do-i-own-my-domain-if-you-grade-it.
    Back to article
  37. 37Ross, J, Sinclair, C, Knox, J, Bayne, S and Macleod, H. 2014. Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1): 56–68. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/ross_0314.pdf.
    Back to article
  38. 38Seraphin, SB, Grizzell, JA, Kerr-German, A, Perkins, MA, Grzanka, PR and Hardin, EE. 2019. A conceptual framework for non-disposable assignments: Inspiring implementation, innovation, and research. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1): 84–97. DOI: 10.1177/1475725718811711
    Back to article
  39. 39Siemens, G. 2004. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1). Available from: http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm Republished here: https://lidtfoundations.pressbooks.com/chapter/connectivism-a-learning-theory-for-the-digital-age/ [Last accessed 3 December 2018].
    Back to article
  40. 40Simonite, T. 22 October 2013. The decline of Wikipedia. MIT Technology Review [online]. Available from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/.
    Back to article
  41. 41Stewart, B. 14 April 2015. In public: The shifting consequences of Twitter scholarship. Hybrid Pedagogy [online]. Available from: https://hybridpedagogy.org/in-public-the-shifting-consequences-of-twitter-scholarship/.
    Back to article
  42. 42Watters, A. 26 April 2017. Un-annotated. [online] Available from: http://hackeducation.com/2017/04/26/no-annotations-thanks-bye.
    Back to article
  43. 43Zamora, M and Bali, M. In press. Network. Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models and Experiments, Modern Language Association (MLA). First draft, with open peer review comments. Available from: https://digitalpedagogy.mla.hcommons.org/keywords/network/.
    Back to article
  44. 44Zamora, M, Bali, M, Mehran, P and Cronin, C. No date. Equity Unbound as critical intercultural praxis. In: Koseoglu, S, Veletsianos, G and Rowell, C (eds.), Critical Digital Pedagogy – Broadening Horizons, Bridging Theory and Practice. Athabasca University Press.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2020
Published on: May 11, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Open educational practices,
social justice,
open education,
open pedagogy

© 2020 Maha Bali, Catherine Cronin, Rajiv S. Jhangiani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 2020 (2020): Issue 1Next article