References
- 1Boyd, LG. 2017. Using technology-enabled learning networks to achieve practical improvement outcomes. MRes thesis, The Open University.
- 2Bradbury, H. (ed.) 2015. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
- 3Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. Available at:
http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735 [Last accessed 7 June 2019]. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - 4Carvalho, L and Goodyear, P. (eds.) 2014. The Architecture of Productive Learning Networks. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203591093
- 5Coghlan, D and Brannick, T. 2014. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organisation. London: Sage.
- 6Coghlan, D and Shani, AB. 2008.
Insider Action Research: The Dynamics of Developing New Capabilities . In: Reason, P and Bradbury, H (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Action Research, 643–655. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607934.n56 - 7Conole, G. 2012. Designing for Learning in an Open World. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0
- 8Engeström, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1): 133–56. DOI: 10.1080/13639080020028747
- 9Fresen, JW and Boyd, LG. 2005. Caught in the web of quality. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(3): 317–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.12.002
- 10Glaser, BG. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley California: Sociology Press.
- 11Glaser, BG. 2005. The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley California: Sociology Press.
- 12Glaser, BG and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
- 13Lipshitz, R, Friedman, VJ and Popper, M. 2007. Demystifying Organisational Learning. Thousand Oaks California: Sage.
- 14Meyer, J and Land, R. (eds.) 2006. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203966273
- 15Nguyen, Q, Rienties, B, Toetenel, L, Ferguson, F and Whitelock, D. 2017. Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behaviour, 76: 703–714. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028
- 16Open University. 2018. Teaching and Learning Tricky Topics. Available at
https://www.open.edu/openlearn/education-development/learning/teaching-and-learning-tricky-topics/content-section-0?active-tab=description-tab [Last accessed 7 June 2019]. - 17Rashman, L, Withers, E and Hartley, J. 2009. Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4): 463–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00257.x
- 18Sannino, A and Engeström, Y. 2017. Co-generation of societally impactful knowledge in Change Laboratories. Management Learning, 48(1): 80–96. DOI: 10.1177/1350507616671285
- 19Shani, AB and Docherty, P. 2008.
Learning by design: Key mechanisms in organisation development . In: Cummings, T (ed.), Handbook of Organisation Development, 499–518. Thousand Oaks California: Sage. - 20Sloep, P. 2016.
Design for Networked Learning . In: Gros, B (eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies, 41–58. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Available athttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-47724-3_3 [Last accessed 7 June 2019]. - 21Urquhart, C. 2013. Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781526402196
- 22Urquhart, C, Lehmann, H and Myers, MD. 2010. ‘Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems’, Information Systems Journal, 20(4): 357–381. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
- 23Wenger, E, McDermott, R and Snyder, W. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- 24Wenger, E, Trayner, B and de Laat, M. 2011. ‘Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework’. Rapport 18. Ruud de Moor Centrum: Open University of the Netherlands. Available at
http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/publications/evaluation-framework/ [Last accessed 7 June 2019]. - 25Wenger-Trayner, B. 2014. Strategic evaluation of network activities. Available at
http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/publications/strategic-evaluation-of-network-activities/ [Last accessed 7 June 2019]. - 26Wenger-Trayner, E, Fenton-O’Creevy, M, Kubiak, C, Hutchinson, S and Wenger-Trayner, B. (eds.) 2015. Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315777122