References
- 1Attali, Y. 2004. Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. The National Council on Measurement in Education.
April 12–16 2004 , San Diego, USA. - 2Beaumont, C, O’Doherty, M and Shannon, L. 2011. Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6): 671–687. DOI: 10.1080/03075071003731135
- 3Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- 4Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 219–233. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572132
- 5Court, K. 2014. Tutor feedback on draft essays: Developing students’ academic writing and subject knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3): 327–345. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.706806
- 6Davis, F. 1986.
A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results . Thesis (PhD). Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. - 7Davis, F, Bagozzi, R and Warshaw, P. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8): 982–1002. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- 8Gibbs, G and Simpson, C. 2005. Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1: 3–31.
- 9Hattie, J and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1): 81–112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
- 10Irons, A. 2008. Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203934333
- 11Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for effective use of learning technologies. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Falmer. DOI: 10.4324/9780203304846
- 12MacLellan, E. 2001. Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4): 307–318. DOI: 10.1080/02602930120063466
- 13Matsumura, S and Hann, G. 2004. Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3): 403–415. DOI: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x
- 14Price, M, Handley, K, Millar, J and O’Donovan, B. 2010. ‘Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3): 277–289 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/02602930903541007
- 15Schroeder, J, Grohe, B and Pogue, R. 2008. The impact of Criterion writing evaluation technology on criminal justice student writing skills. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19(3): 432–445. DOI: 10.1080/10511250802476269
- 16Stevenson, M and Phakiti, A. 2014. The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19: 51–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
- 17Sutton, H. 2017. Don’t get lost in the noise: Craft emails students will read. Enrollment Management Report, 21(9): 6–7. DOI: 10.1002/emt.30364
- 18Warschauer, M and Grimes, D. 2008. Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1): 22–36. DOI: 10.1080/15544800701771580
- 19Whitelock, D, Twiner, A, Richardson, JT, Field, D and Pulman, S. 2014. ‘OpenEssayist: real-life testing of an automated feedback system for draft essay writing’. #design4learning: from blended learning to learning analytics in HE. DOI: 10.1145/2723576.2723599