Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Education and Learning Design: Open Pedagogy in Praxis Cover

Open Education and Learning Design: Open Pedagogy in Praxis

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2019 (2019): Issue 1
By: Michael Paskevicius and  Valerie Irvine  
Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. 1Andrade, A, Ehlers, U-D, Caine, A, Carneiro, R, Conole, G, Kairamo, A-K, Koskinen, T, Kretschmer, T, Moe-Pryce, N, Mundin, P, Nozes, J, Reinhardt, R, Richter, T, Silva, G and Holmberg, C. 2011. Beyond OER: Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices. Open Educational Quality Initiative.
    Back to article
  2. 2Bali, M. 21 April 2017. Curation of Posts on Open Pedagogy #YearOfOpen. Available at https://blog.mahabali.me/whyopen/curation-of-posts-on-open-pedagogy-yearofopen/ [Accessed 5 February 2019].
    Back to article
  3. 3Banzato, M. 2012. A Case Study of Teachers’ Open Educational Practices. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 8(3). DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/650
    Back to article
  4. 4Bates, T. 2018. Canada. In: Qayyum, A and Zawacki-Richter, O (eds.), Open and Distance Education in Australia, Europe and the Americas, 49–62. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0298-5_6
    Back to article
  5. 5BCcampus. 2018. Open Textbook Stats. Available at https://open.bccampus.ca/open-textbook-stats/ [Accessed 16 July 2019].
    Back to article
  6. 6Beetham, H, Falconer, I, McGill, L and Littlejohn, A. 2012. Open Practices Briefing Paper. Available at https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing [Accessed 16 July 2019].
    Back to article
  7. 7Bliss, TJ, Robinson, T, Hilton, J and Wiley, D. 2013. An OER COUP: College Teacher and Student Perceptions of Open Educational Resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1). DOI: 10.5334/2013-04
    Back to article
  8. 8Blomgren, C. 2018. OER Awareness and Use: The Affinity Between Higher Education and K-12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
    Back to article
  9. 9Borthwick, K and Gallagher-Brett, A. 2014. ‘Inspiration, Ideas, Encouragement’: Teacher Development and Improved Use of Technology in Language Teaching Through Open Educational Practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2): 163–183. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2013.818560
    Back to article
  10. 10Carey, T, Davis, A, Ferreras, S and Porter, D. 2015. Using Open Educational Practices to Support Institutional Strategic Excellence in Teaching, Learning & Scholarship. Open Praxis, 7(2). DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.201
    Back to article
  11. 11Corbin, J and Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153
    Back to article
  12. 12Creswell, JW. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.
    Back to article
  13. 13Creswell, JW. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
    Back to article
  14. 14Cronin, C. 2017. Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
    Back to article
  15. 15Cronin, C and MacLaren, I. 2018. Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2): 127–143. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
    Back to article
  16. 16Davis, FD. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
    Back to article
  17. 17Deimann, M and Farrow, R. 2013. Rethinking OER and their use: Open education as Bildung. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3): 344–360. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1370
    Back to article
  18. 18de los Arcos, B, Farrow, R, Perryman, L-A, Pitt, R and Weller, M. 2014. OER Evidence Report 2013–2014. Available at http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/41866 [Accessed 16 July 2019].
    Back to article
  19. 19Ehlers, U-D. 2011. Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2): 1–10.
    Back to article
  20. 20Ehlers, U-D. 2013. Open Learning Cultures: A Guide to Quality, Evaluation, and Assessment for Future Learning. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Back to article
  21. 21Fischer, L, Hilton, J, Robinson, TJ and Wiley, DA. 2015. A Multi-Institutional Study of the Impact of Open Textbook Adoption on the Learning Outcomes of Post-Secondary Students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3): 159–172. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x
    Back to article
  22. 22Giorgi, A. 1997. The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2): 235–260. DOI: 10.1163/156916297X00103
    Back to article
  23. 23Glaser, BG. 1965. The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis. Social Problems, 12(4): 436–445. DOI: 10.2307/798843
    Back to article
  24. 24Government of Canada. 2016. Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. Retrieved from Government of Canada website. http://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_F6765465.html.
    Back to article
  25. 25Gray, DE. 2014. Doing Research in the Real World. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
    Back to article
  26. 26Hegarty, B. 2015. Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational Resources. Educational Technology, 4.
    Back to article
  27. 27Hein, SF and Austin, WJ. 2001. Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: A comparison. Psychological Methods, 6(1): 3–17. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.1.3
    Back to article
  28. 28Hilton, J. 2016. Open Educational Resources and College Textbook Choices: A Review of Research on Efficacy and Perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4): 573–590. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
    Back to article
  29. 29Hodgkinson-Williams, C and Gray, E. 2009. Degrees of Openness: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources at the University of Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 5(5): 101–116.
    Back to article
  30. 30Hood, N and Littlejohn, A. 2017. Knowledge Typologies for Professional Learning: Educators’ (re)generation of Knowledge When Learning Open Educational Practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z
    Back to article
  31. 31Horsburgh, D. 2003. Evaluation of Qualitative Research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2): 307–312. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x
    Back to article
  32. 32Jhangiani, R and Dastur, FN. 2018. As Good or Better than Commercial Textbooks: Students’ Perceptions and Outcomes from Using Open Digital and Open Print Textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1): 22. DOI: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5
    Back to article
  33. 33Jhangiani, R, Pitt, R, Hendricks, C, Key, J and Lalonde, C. 2016. Exploring Faculty Use of Open Educational Resources at British Columbia Post-Secondary Institutions. Available at https://bccampus.ca/files/2016/01/BCFacultyUseOfOER_final.pdf [Accessed 16 July 2019].
    Back to article
  34. 34Jung, E, Bauer, C and Heaps, A. 2017. Strategic Implementation of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions. Educational Technology, 57(2): 78–84.
    Back to article
  35. 35Kaatrakoski, H, Littlejohn, A and Hood, N. 2017. Learning Challenges in Higher Education: An Analysis of Contradictions Within Open Educational Practice. Higher Education, 74(4): 599–615. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
    Back to article
  36. 36Kimmons, R. 2016. Expansive Openness in Teacher Practice. Teachers College Record, 118(9): 1–34.
    Back to article
  37. 37Knox, J. 2013. The Limitations of Access Alone: moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1): 21–29. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36
    Back to article
  38. 38Kruger, D. 1988. An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology. 2nd ed. Juta Academic.
    Back to article
  39. 39Littlejohn, A and McGill, L. 2016. Ecologies of Open Resources and Pedagogies of Abundance. In: Kinshuk, BG and Maina, M (eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies, 115–130. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_7
    Back to article
  40. 40McGreal, R. 2017. Special Report on the Role of Open Educational Resources in Supporting the Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education Challenges and Opportunities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3541
    Back to article
  41. 41McGreal, R, Anderson, T and Conrad, D. 2015. Open Educational Resources in Canada 2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2404
    Back to article
  42. 42Nascimbeni, F and Burgos, D. 2016. In Search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a Definition and a Framework to Increase Openness Adoption Among University Educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2736
    Back to article
  43. 43OPAL. 2011. OEP Scape: The Open Educational Practice Landscape. Essen, Germany: ICDE Educational Quality Initiative.
    Back to article
  44. 44Ozdemir, O and Hendricks, C. 2017. Instructor and student experiences with open textbooks, from the California open online library for education (Cool4Ed). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1): 98–113. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-017-9138-0
    Back to article
  45. 45Paskevicius, M. 2017. Conceptualizing Open Educational Practices through the Lens of Constructive Alignment. Open Praxis, 9(2): 125. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.519
    Back to article
  46. 46Petrides, L, Jimes, C, Middleton-Detzner, C, Walling, J and Weiss, S. 2011. Open Textbook Adoption and Use: Implications for Teachers and Learners. Open Learning, 26(1): 39–49. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2011.538563
    Back to article
  47. 47Pitt, R. 2015. Mainstreaming Open Textbooks: Educator Perspectives on the Impact of OpenStax College open textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2381
    Back to article
  48. 48Rolfe, V. 2017. Striving Toward Openness: But What Do We Really Mean? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3207
    Back to article
  49. 49Schinske, J and Tanner, K. 2014. Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently). CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2): 159–166. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.CBE-14-03-0054
    Back to article
  50. 50Schneider, J and Hutt, E. 2014. Making the grade: a history of the A–F marking scheme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(2): 201–224. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2013.790480
    Back to article
  51. 51Seaman, JE and Seaman, J. 2019. Freeing the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2018. Available at https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf.
    Back to article
  52. 52Stagg, A. 2014. OER adoption: a continuum for practice. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 11(3): 151. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2102
    Back to article
  53. 53Stagg, A. 2017. The Ecology of the Open Practitioner: A Conceptual Framework for Open Research. Open Praxis, 9(4): 363–374. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.9.4.662
    Back to article
  54. 54Weller, M, de los Arcos, B, Farrow, R, Pitt, B and McAndrew, P. 2015. The Impact of OER on Teaching and Learning Practice. Open Praxis, 7(4). DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.227
    Back to article
  55. 55Wiley, D. 2 May 2017. OER-Enabled Pedagogy. Available at https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/5009 [Accessed 16 July 2019].
    Back to article
  56. 56Wiley, D and Hilton, JL, III. 2018. Defining OER-Enabled Pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.512 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 14, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 13, 2019
Published on: Sep 10, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Open educational practices,
open pedagogy,
learning design,
open and networked learning,
technology integrated learning,
digital literacy

© 2019 Michael Paskevicius, Valerie Irvine, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2019 (2019): Issue 1Next article