Evaluating the Network: A Workflow for Tracking Twitter Interactions Using Social Networking Analysis

Bik H M Dove A D M Goldstein M C Helm R R MacPherson R Martini K Warneke A McClain C ‘Ten simple rules for effective online outreach’ PLOS Computational Biology 2015 11 4 e1003906 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003906

Bik H M Goldstein M C ‘An introduction to social media for scientists’ PLOS Biology 2013 11 4 e1001535 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535

boyd D Crawford K ‘Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon’ Information, communication & society 2012 15 5 662 679 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

boyd D M Ellison N B ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship’ Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2007 13 1 210 230 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Bruns A Stieglitz S ‘Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter’ Journal of Technology in Human Services 2012 30 3 4 160 185 10.1080/15228835.2012.744249

Carrigan M Social media for academics 2016 London Sage

Darling E Shiffman D Cȏté I Drew J ‘The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication’ Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 2013 6 1 2 43 10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f

Department of Higher Education and Training (South Africa) Speech by the Minister of Higher Education and Training, DR BE Nzimande, to parliament 2015 2015 Oct 27

Durland M M Fredericks K A ‘An introduction to social network analysis’ New Directions for Evaluation 2005 107 5 13 10.1002/ev.157

Ford K C Veletsianos G Resta P ‘The Structure and Characteristics of #PhDChat, an Emergent Online Social Network’ Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2014 2014 1 10.5334/2014-08

Fredericks K A ‘Using social network analysis in evaluation: A report to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’ 2013 Princeton, NJ Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Freeman L C Scott J Carrington P J ‘The development of social network analysis – with an emphasis on recent events’ The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis 2011 London Sage 26 39

Gaffney D Puschmann C Weller K Bruns A Burgess J Mahrt M Puschmann C ‘Data collection on Twitter’ Twitter and Society 2013 New York Peter Lang 55 67

Gonzalez-Bailon S Wang N Rivero A Borge-Holthoefer J Moreno Y ‘Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks’ Social Networks 2014 38 16 27 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004

Goodier S Czerniewicz L Academics’ online presence: a four-step guide to taking control of your visibility 2014 Cape Town University of Cape Town

Granovetter M S ‘The strength of weak ties’ American Journal of Sociology 1973 78 6 1360 1380 10.1086/225469

Haines V A Godley J Hawe P ‘Understanding interdisciplinary collaborations as social networks’ American Journal of Community Psychology 2011 47 1–2 1 11 10.1007/s10464-010-9374-1

Hansen D Shneiderman B Smith M A Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world 2010 Burlington, MA Morgan Kaufmann

Hawksey M About – TAGS 2014 [online]. Available at: https://tags.hawksey.info/ (Accessed 13 September 2016)

Hawksey M TAGSExplorer 2016 [online]. Available at: http://hawksey.info/tagsexplorer/ [Accessed 13 September 2016]

Haythornthwaite C ‘Social networks and internet connectivity effects’ Information, Communication & Society 2005 8 2 125 147 10.1080/13691180500146185

Hodgkinson-Williams C Research into Open Educational Resources for Development in post-secondary education in the Global South (ROER4D) Proposal 2013 Cape Town ROER4D

Hogan B Fielding N G Lee R M Blank G ‘Analyzing social networks via the internet’ The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods 2008 London Sage 141 160 10.4135/9780857020055.n8

Hoppe B Reinelt C ‘Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks’ The Leadership Quarterly 2010 21 4 600 619 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004

Jongbloed B Vossensteyn H ‘University funding and student funding: international comparisons’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2016 32 4 576 595 10.1093/oxrep/grw029

Kimmons R Veletsianos G ‘Education scholars’ evolving uses of twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform’ British Journal of Educational Technology 2016 47 3 445 464 10.1111/bjet.12428

Knight C G Kaye L K ‘To tweet or not to tweet?’ A comparison of academics’ and students’ usage of Twitter in academic contexts’ Innovations in Education And Teaching International 2016 53 2 145 155 10.1080/14703297.2014.928229

Letierce J Passant A Decker S Breslin J ‘Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages’ Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line 26–27 April 2010 2010 Raleigh, NC, USA

Li J Greenhow C ‘Scholars and social media: tweeting in the conference backchannel for professional learning’ Educational Media International 2015 52 1 1 14 10.1080/09523987.2015.1005426

Luke D A Harris J K ‘Network analysis in Public Health: History, methods, and applications’ Annual Review of Public Health 2007 28 69 93 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144132

Mahrt M Weller K Peters I Weller K Bruns A Burgess J Mahrt M Puschmann C ‘Twitter in Scholarly Communication’ Twitter and Society 2013 New York Peter Lang 399 410

Marin A Wellman B Scott J Carrington P J ‘Social network analysis: An introduction’ The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis 2011 London Sage 11 25

Mollett A Moran D Dunleavy P Using Twitter in university research, Teaching and Impact Activities 2011 London London School of Economics and Political Science Public Policy Group

Moreno M Goniu N Moreno P Diekema D ‘Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations’ Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking 2013 16 9 708 713 10.1089/cyber.2012.0334

Palmer S ‘Characterisation of the use of Twitter by Australian Universities’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2013 35 4 333 344 10.1080/1360080X.2013.812029

Patton M Q Utilization-focused Evaluation 2008 Thousand Oaks, California Sage

Ramírez R Brodhead D Utilization Focused Evaluation: A Primer for Evaluators 2013 Penang Southbound

ROER4D ROER4D infographic 2013 Cape Town ROER4D [online]. Available from: http://roer4d.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ROER4D-Infographic-2-pages-23.3.2015.pdf [Accessed 23 November 2016]

Rogers R Weller K Bruns A Burgess J Mahrt M Puschmann C ‘Debanalising Twitter: The transformation of an object of study’ Twitter and Society 2013 New York Peter Lang 55 67

Smith M Ceni A Milic-Frayling N Schneiderman B Mendes Rodrigues E Leskovec J Dunne C NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016 2010 California Social Media Research Foundation

Smith M A Shneiderman B Milic-Frayling N Mendes Rodrigues E Barash V Dunne C Capone T Perer A Gleave E ‘Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL’ Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies 25–27 June 2009 2009 University Park, PA, USA 255 264 10.1145/1556460.1556497

Social Media Research Foundation NodeXL: Network overview, discovery and exploration for Excel 2014 [online]. Available from: http://nodexl.codeplex.com/releases/view/117659 [Accessed 13 September 2016]

Townsend L Wallace C Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics 2016 [online]. Available from: http://www.dotrural.ac.uk/socialmediaresearchethics.pdf [Accessed 5 December 2017]

Twitter Company 2016a [online]. Available from: https://about.twitter.com/company [Accessed 24 November 2016]

Twitter Tweet Activity Dashboard 2016b [online]. Available from: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20171990 [Accessed 24 November 2016]

Veletsianos G Kimmons R ‘Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter?’ The Internet and Higher Education 2016 30 1 10 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.002

Wasserman S Faust K Social Network Analysis 1994 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Zimmer M ‘But the data is already public’: on the ethics of research in Facebook Ethics in Information Technology 2010 12 4 313 325 10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5