Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ethics in Archaeological Lidar Cover
Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. 1Agapiou, A and Lysandrou, V. 2015. Remote sensing archaeology: Tracking and mapping evolution in European scientific literature from 1999 to 2015. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 4: 192200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.010
  2. 2Alcock, SE and Cherry, JF. 2016. Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  3. 3Atalay, S. 2006. Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3/4): 280310. DOI: 10.1353/aiq.2006.0015
  4. 4Atalay, S. 2012. Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  5. 5Balkansky, AK. 2006. Surveys and Mesoamerican Archaeology: The Emerging Macroregional Paradigm. Journal of Archaeological Research, 14(1): 5395. DOI: 10.1007/s10814-005-9001-0
  6. 6Begley, C. 2016. The Lost White City of Honduras Discovered Again (and Again). In: Card, JJ and Anderson, DS (eds.), Lost City, Found Pyramid: Alternative Archaeologies and Psuedoscientific Practices, 3545. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
  7. 7Bevan, A. 2015. The data deluge. Antiquity, 89(349): 14731484. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2015.102
  8. 8Bewley, RH, Crutchley, SP and Shell, CA. 2005. New light on an ancient landscape: lidar survey in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Antiquity, 79(305): 636647. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00114577
  9. 9Billman, BR and Feinman, GM. (eds.) 1999. Settlement Pattern Studies in the Americas: Fifty Years Since Virau: Fifty Years Since Viru. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
  10. 10Bing, J. 2009. Building Cyberspace: A Brief History of Internet. In: Bygrave, LA and Bing, J (eds.), Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, 848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561131.003.0002
  11. 11Brady, C, Barton, K and Seaver, M. 2013. Recent geophysical investigations and LiDAR analysis at the Hill of Slane, Co. Meath. Riocht na Midhe, 24: 134155.
  12. 12Campana, S. 2017. Drones in Archaeology. State-of-the-art and Future Perspectives. Archaeological Prospection, 24(4): 275296. DOI: 10.1002/arp.1569
  13. 13Canuto, MA, Estrada-Belli, F, Garrison, TG, Houston, SD, Acuña, MJ, Kováč, M, Marken, D, Nondédéo, P, Auld-Thomas, L, Castanet, C, Chatelain, D, Chiriboga, CR, Drápela, T, Lieskovský, T, Tokovinine, A, Velasquez, A, Fernández-Díaz, JC and Shrestha, R. 2018. Ancient lowland Maya complexity as revealed by airborne laser scanning of northern Guatemala. Science, 361(6409): eaau0137. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau0137
  14. 14Casana, J and Panahipour, M. 2014. Notes on a disappearing past: Satellite-based monitoring of looting and damage to archaeological sites in Syria. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 2(2): 128151. DOI: 10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.2.2.0128
  15. 15Chapin, M, Lamb, Z and Threlkeld, B. 2005. Mapping Indigenous Lands. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1): 619638. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429
  16. 16Chase, AF and Chase, DZ. 2017. Detection of Maya Ruins by LiDAR: Applications, Case Study, and Issues. In: Masini, N and Soldovieri, F (eds.), Sensing the Past: From artifact to historical site, 455468. Geotechnologies and the Environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_22
  17. 17Chase, AF, Chase, DZ, Fisher, CT, Leisz, SJ and Weishampel, JF. 2012. Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(32): 1291612921. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205198109
  18. 18Chase, AF, Chase, DZ, Weishampel, JF, Drake, JB, Shrestha, RL, Slatton, KC, Awe, JJ and Carter, WE. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2): 387398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.018
  19. 19Chase, AF, Reese-Taylor, K, Fernandez-Diaz, JC and Chase, DZ. 2016. Progression and Issues in the Mesoamerican Geospatial Revolution: An Introduction. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4(3): 219231. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.219
  20. 20Chase, AZ, Chase, DZ and Chase, AF. In Press. Ethics, New Colonialism, and Lidar Data: A Decade of Lidar in Mesoamerica. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, this Special Collection.
  21. 21Chevance, J-B, Evans, D, Hofer, N, Sakhouen, S and Chhean, R. 2019. Mahendraparvata: an early Angkor-period capital defined through airborne laser scanning at Phnom Kulen. Antiquity, 93(371): 13031321. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.133
  22. 22Coe, M and Evans, D. 2018. Angkor and the Khmer Civilization. London: Thames and Hudson.
  23. 23Cohen, AS and Solinis-Casparius, R. 2017. The micropolitics of public archaeology: Working with the ejido in Michoacán, Mexico. Journal of Social Archaeology, 17(3): 326348. DOI: 10.1177/1469605317724526
  24. 24Collins, HM and Evans, R. 2002. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235296. DOI: 10.1177/0306312702032002003
  25. 25Colwell, C. 2016. Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45(1): 113127. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937
  26. 26Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C and Ferguson, TJ. 2010. Intersecting magisteria: Bridging archaeological science and traditional knowledge. Journal of Social Archaeology, 10(3): 325346. DOI: 10.1177/1469605310377960
  27. 27Corsi, C, Slapšak, B and Vermeulen, F. (eds.) 2013. Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics: Non-invasive Survey of Complex Archaeological Sites. Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6
  28. 28Cowley, D, Banaszek, Ł, Geddes, G, Gannon, A, Middleton, M and Millican, K. In Prep. Making LiGHT Work of Large Area Survey. Developing Approaches to Rapid Archaeological Mapping and the Creation of Systematic National-scaled Heritage Data. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, this Special Collection.
  29. 29Cruz-Castillo, ON. 2015. Informe Exploración en La Mosquitia. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia.
  30. 30Davidson, W. 1991. Geographical perspectives on Spanish-Pech (Paya) Indian relationships, in sixteenth-century Northeast Honduras. In: Hurst Thomas, D (ed.), The Spanish borderlands in Pan-American perspective, 205226. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  31. 31Davis, HA. 1984. Approaches to ethical problems by archaeological organizations. In: Green, EL (ed.), Ethics and Values in Archaeology, 1321. New York: Free Press.
  32. 32Deering, C and Stoker, JM. 2014. Let’s agree on the casing of Lidar. LiDAR Magazine, 4(6): 4851.
  33. 33Doneus, M, Mandlburger, G and Doneus, N. In Press. Archaeological Filtering of Airborne Laser Scan Derived Point-Clouds in Difficult Environments. Journal of Computer Applications, this Special Collection.
  34. 34European Council. 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised). European Treaty Series 14. Strasbourg, France: European Council.
  35. 35Evans, D. 2013. The Real Significance of Mahendraparvata. The Diplomat, 28 November [online access at https://thediplomat.com/2013/11/the-real-significance-of-mahendraparvata/ last accessed 2 November 2019].
  36. 36Evans, D. 2016. Airborne laser scanning as a method for exploring long-term socio-ecological dynamics in Cambodia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 74: 164175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.05.009
  37. 37Evans, D and Fletcher, R. 2015. The landscape of Angkor Wat redefined. Antiquity, 89(348): 14021419. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2015.157
  38. 38Evans, DH, Fletcher, RJ, Pottier, C, Chevance, J-B, Soutif, D, Tan, BS, Im, S, Ea, D, Tin, T, Kim, S, Cromarty, C, De Greef, S, Hanus, K, Baty, P, Kuszinger, R, Shimoda, I and Boornazian, G. 2013. Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(31): 1259512600. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1306539110
  39. 39Feder, KL. 2014. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries. Science and Psuedoscience in Archaeology. 9th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  40. 40Fernandez-Diaz, JC and Cohen, AS. In Press. Whose data is it anyway? Lessons in data management and sharing from resurrecting and repurposing lidar data for archaeological research in Honduras. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, this Special Collection.
  41. 41Fernandez-Diaz, JC, Cohen, AS, González, AM and Fisher, CT. 2018. Shifting Perspectives and Ethical Concerns in the Era of Remote Sensing Technologies. SAA Archaeological Record, 18(2): 815.
  42. 42Fisher, CT, Cohen, AS, Fernandez Diaz, JC and Leisz, SJ. 2017. The Application of Airborne Mapping LiDAR for the Documentation of Ancient Cities and Regions. Quaternary International, 448: 129138. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.050
  43. 43Fisher, CT, Fernández-Diaz, JC, Cohen, AS, Neil Cruz, O, Gonzáles, AM, Leisz, SJ, Pezzutti, F, Shrestha, R and Carter, W. 2016. Identifying Ancient Settlement Patterns through LiDAR in the Mosquitia Region of Honduras. PLOS ONE, 11(8): e0159890. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159890
  44. 44Fisher, CT and Leisz, SJ. 2013. New Perspectives on Purépecha Urbanism Through the Use of LiDAR at the Site of Angamuco, Mexico. In: Comer, DC and Harrower, MJ (eds.), Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space, 199210. NY: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6074-9_16
  45. 45Forest, M, Costa, L, Combey, A, Dorison, A and Pereira, G. 2020. Testing Web Mapping and Active Learning to Approach Lidar Data. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 8(1): 2539. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2019.42
  46. 46Frank, RD, Kriesberg, A, Yakel, E and Daniel, IM. 2015. Looting Hoards of Gold and Poaching Spotted Owls: Data Confidentiality among Archaeologists & Zoologists. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1): 110. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010037
  47. 47Garrison, TG, Houston, S and Alcover Firpi, O. 2019. Recentering the rural: Lidar and articulated landscapes among the Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 53: 133146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.11.005
  48. 48González-Ruibal, A. 2009. Topography of terror or cultural heritage? The monuments of Franco’s Spain. In: Forebes, N, Page, R and Perez, G (eds.), Europe’s deadly century. Perspectives on 20th century conflict heritage, 6572. Swindon, UK: English Heritage.
  49. 49Green, LF, Green, DR and Neves, EG. 2003. Indigenous Knowledge and Archaeological Science: The Challenges of Public Archaeology in the Reserva Uaçá. Journal of Social Archaeology, 3(3): 366398. DOI: 10.1177/14696053030033005
  50. 50Haanappel, PPC. 2003. The law and policy of air space and outer space: A comparative approach. The Hague; New York: Kluwer Law International.
  51. 51Haney, WM. 2015. Protecting Tribal Skies: Why Indian Tribes Possess the Sovereign Authority to Regulate Tribal Airspace. American Indian Law Review, 40: 140.
  52. 52Hare, T, Masson, M and Russell, B. 2014. High-Density LiDAR Mapping of the Ancient City of Mayapán. Remote Sensing, 6(9): 90649085. DOI: 10.3390/rs6099064
  53. 53Hayes, TM. 2010. A challenge for environmental governance: Institutional change in a traditional common-property forest system. Policy Sciences, 43(1): 2748. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9083-5
  54. 54Herlihy, P. 1997. Indigenous Peoples and Biosphere Conservation in the Mosquitia Rain Forest Corridor Honduras. In: Stevens, S and Dean, TD (eds.), Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas, 99133. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  55. 55Holly, DH. 2015. Talking to the Guy on the Airplane. American Antiquity, 80(3): 615617. DOI: 10.1017/S0002731600003577
  56. 56Huggett, J. 2012. Promise and paradox: accessing open data in archaeology. In: Mills, C, Pidd, M and Ward, E (eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012. Series: Studies in the Digital Humanities. HRI Online Publications: Sheffield.
  57. 57Huggett, J. 2018. Reuse Remix Recycle: Repurposing Archaeological Digital Data. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(2): 93104. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.1
  58. 58Inomata, T, Triadan, D, Pinzón, F, Burham, M, Ranchos, J L, Aoyama, K and Haraguchi, T. 2018. Archaeological application of airborne LiDAR to examine social changes in the Ceibal region of the Maya lowlands. PLOS ONE, 13(2): e0191619. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191619
  59. 59Iriarte, J, Robinson, ME, De Souza, JG, Damasceno, A, da Silva, F, Nakahara, FR, Ranzi, A and Aragao, LE. In Prep. Geometry by Design: Contribution of Lidar to the Understanding of Settlement Patterns of the Mound Villages in SW Amazonia. Journal of Computer Applications, this Special Collection.
  60. 60ITU, United Nations. 2019. ITU, United Nations. Statistics, 15 October 2019. Available at https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx [Last accessed 23 February 2020].
  61. 61Kansa, SW and Kansa, EC. 2018 Data Beyond the Archive in Digital Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(2): 8992. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.7
  62. 62Khan, S, Aragão, L and Iriarte, J. 2017. A UAV–lidar system to map Amazonian rainforest and its ancient landscape transformations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(8–10): 23132330. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1295486
  63. 63Klassen, S, Weed, J and Evans, D. 2018. Semi-supervised machine learning approaches for predicting the chronology of archaeological sites: A case study of temples from medieval Angkor, Cambodia. PLOS ONE, 13(11): e0205649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205649
  64. 64Klein, TH, Goldstein, L, Gangloff, D and Lees, WB. 2018. The Future of American Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(1): 118. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2017.34
  65. 65Krieger, WH. 2014. Marketing Archaeology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(5): 923939. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-014-9497-9
  66. 66Lambers, K, Verschoof-van der Vaart, WB and Bourgeois, QPJ. 2019. Integrating Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Citizen Science in Dutch Archaeological Prospection. Remote Sensing, 11(7): 794. DOI: 10.3390/rs11070794
  67. 67Lanza, R de J, Escobar, MT, Moncada, MDC and Castellanos, RC. 1992. Los Pech (payas): una cultura olvidada. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Editorial Guaymuras.
  68. 68Lara-Pinto, G and Hasemann, G. 1991. Leyendas y arqueología: ¿cuántas ciudades blancas hay en la Mosquitia? In: Murphy, V (ed.), La Reserva de la Biósfera del Río Plátano, 1619. Tegucigalpa: Ventanas Tropicales.
  69. 69Leighton, M. 2016. Indigenous Archaeological Field Technicians at Tiwanaku, Bolivia: A Hybrid Form of Scientific Labor. American Anthropologist, 118(4): 742754. DOI: 10.1111/aman.12682
  70. 70Leisz, SJ. 2013. An Overview of the Application of Remote Sensing to Archaeology During the Twentieth Century. In: Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space, 1119. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology. Springer New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6074-9_2
  71. 71Lin, AY-M, Huynh, A, Lanckriet, G and Barrington, L. 2014. Crowdsourcing the Unknown: The Satellite Search for Genghis Khan. PLOS ONE, 9(12): e114046. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114046
  72. 72Lynott, MJ and Wylie, A. 1995. Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
  73. 73Markham, AN, Tiidenberg, K and Herman, A. 2018. Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction. Social Media + Society, 4(3): 2056305118784502. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118784502
  74. 74Matsuda, D. 1998. The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: Point muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1): 8797. DOI: 10.1017/S0940739198770080
  75. 75McClanahan, A. 2007. The Cult of Community: Defining the ‘Local” in Public Archaeology and Heritage Discourse. In: Grabow, S, Hull, D and Waterton, E (eds.), Which Past, Whose Future? Treatments of the Past at the Start of the 21st Century, 5156. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  76. 76McCoy, MD. 2017. Geospatial Big Data and archaeology: Prospects and problems too great to ignore. Journal of Archaeological Science, 84: 7494. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.003
  77. 77McNiven, IJ. 2016. Theoretical Challenges of Indigenous Archaeology: Setting an Agenda. American Antiquity, 81(1): 2741. DOI: 10.7183/0002-7316.81.1.27
  78. 78Meskell, L. 2005. Archaeological ethnography: Conversations around Kruger National Park. Archaeologies, 1(1): 81100. DOI: 10.1007/s11759-005-0010-x
  79. 79Morell, V. 1995. Who owns the past? Science, 268(5216): 1424. DOI: 10.1126/science.7770766
  80. 80Myers, A. 2010. Camp Delta, Google Earth and the ethics of remote sensing in archaeology. World Archaeology, 42(3): 455467. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2010.498640
  81. 81Nicholas, G and Hollowell, J. 2007. Ethical Challenges to a Postcolonial Archaeology: The Legacy of Scientific Colonialism. In: Hamilakis, Y and Duke, P (eds.), Archaeology and Capitalism, 5982. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  82. 82Nicholas, GP. 2006. Decolonizing the Archaeological Landscape: The Practice and Politics of Archaeology in British Columbia. The American Indian Quarterly, 30(3): 350380. DOI: 10.1353/aiq.2006.0031
  83. 83Nuninger, L, Opitz, RS, Verhagen, P, Libourel, T, Laplaige, C, Leturcq, S, Le Voguer, N, Fruchart, C, Kokalj, Z and Rodier, X. In Press. Developing FAIR Ontological Pathways: Linking Evidence of Movement in Lidar to Models of Human Behaviour. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, this Special Collection.
  84. 84Opitz, R. 2016. Airborne laserscanning in archaeology: maturing methods and democratizing applications. In: Forte, M and Campana, S (eds.), Digital Methods and Remote Sensing in Archaeology, 3550. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40658-9_2
  85. 85Opitz, R and Herrmann, J. 2018. Recent trends and long-standing problems in archaeological remote sensing. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1: 1941. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.11
  86. 86Opitz, R and Limp, WF. 2015. Recent Developments in High-Density Survey and Measurement (HDSM) for Archaeology: Implications for Practice and Theory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1): 347364. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013845
  87. 87Pedraza, C. 1892. Relación de la provincia de Honduras y (sic) Higueras. Sevilla: Tip. El Obrero de Nazaret.
  88. 88Pels, P, Boog, I, Florusbosch, J H, Kripe, Z, Minter, T, Postma, M, Sleeboom-Faulkner, M, Simpson, B, Dilger, H, Schönhuth, M, von Poser, A, Castillo, RCA, Lederman, R and Richards-Rissetto, H. 2018. Data management in anthropology: The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology, 26(3): 391413. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8676.12526
  89. 89Pyburn, KA. 2011. Engaged Archaeology: Whose Community? Which Public? In: Okamura, K and Matsuda, A (eds.), New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology, 2941. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0341-8_3
  90. 90Rayne, L, Bradbury, J, Mattingly, D, Philip, G, Bewley, R and Wilson, A. 2017. From Above and on the Ground: Geospatial Methods for Recording Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa. Geosciences 7(4): 100. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences7040100
  91. 91Reynolds, GH and Merges, RP. 2019. Outer Space: Problems of Law and Policy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429300820
  92. 92Richards, NM and King, JH. 2014. Big Data Ethics. Wake Forest Law Review, 49: 393432.
  93. 93Richardson, L-J. 2018. Ethical Challenges in Digital Public Archaeology. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1(1): 6473. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.13
  94. 94Richardson, L-J and Almansa-Sánchez, J. 2015. Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics. World Archaeology, 47(2): 194211. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599
  95. 95Richards-Rissetto, H and von Schwerin, J. 2017. A catch 22 of 3D data sustainability: Lessons in 3D archaeological data management & accessibility. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 6: 3848. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2017.04.005
  96. 96Rosenswig, RM, Lopez-Torrijos, R, Antonelli, CE and Mendelsohn, RR. 2013. Lidar mapping and surface survey of the Izapa state on the tropical piedmont of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(3): 14931507. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.034
  97. 97Ryan, J. 2010. A History of the Internet and the Digital Future. London: Reaktion Books.
  98. 98Sanders, WT, Parsons, JR and Santley, RR. 1979. The Basin of Mexico: Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. New York: Academic Press.
  99. 99Scott, JC. 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  100. 100Sheehan, N and Lilley, I. 2008. Things Are Not Always What They Seem. In Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C and Ferguson, TJ (eds.), Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 87115. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  101. 101Sheets, P. 1991. “Very-to-Barely” Remote Sensing of Prehistoric Features under Tephra in Central America. In: Behrens, CA and Sever, TL (eds.), Applications of Space-Age Technology in Anthropology: November 28, 1990 Conference Proceedings, 167180. Mississippi: NASA Science and Technology Laboratory John C. Stennis Space Center.
  102. 102Silliman, SW and Amerind Foundation. (eds.) 2008. Collaborating at the trowel’s edge: Teaching and learning in indigenous archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  103. 103Smith, C and Burke, H. 2003. In the Spirit of the Code. In: Zimmerman, LJ, Vitelli, KD and Hallowell-Zimmer, J (eds.), Ethical Issues in Archaeology, 177197. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  104. 104Smith, C and Jackson, G. 2006. Decolonizing Indigenous Archaeology: Developments from Down Under. The American Indian Quarterly, 30(3): 311349. DOI: 10.1353/aiq.2006.0032
  105. 105Stenborg, P, Schaan, DP and Figueiredo, CG. 2018. Contours of the Past: LiDAR Data Expands the Limits of Late Pre-Columbian Human Settlement in the Santarém Region, Lower Amazon. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(1): 4457. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2017.1417198
  106. 106Stone, D. 1957. The Archaeology of Central and Southern Honduras. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  107. 107Stone, EC. 2008. Patterns of looting in southern Iraq. Antiquity, 82(315): 125138. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00096496
  108. 108Tauli-Corpuz, V. 2016. Report: The situation of indigenous peoples in Honduras, 21 July. Available at http://unsr.vtaulicorpuz.org/site/index.php/en/documents/country-reports/148-report-honduras [Last accessed 3 November 2019].
  109. 109Trope, JF and Echo-Hawk, WR. 1992. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: The Background and Legislative History. Ariz. St. LJ, 24: 35.
  110. 110Trouillot, M-R. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.
  111. 111Turner, S. 2006. Historic Landscape Characterisation: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landscape Research, 31(4): 385398. DOI: 10.1080/01426390601004376
  112. 112Ur, J. 2006. Google Earth and Archaeology. SAA Archaeological Record, 6(3): 3538.
  113. 113Watkins, J. 2000. Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  114. 114Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from Things. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California.
  115. 115Wylie, A. 2003. On Ethics. In: Zimmerman, LJ, Vitelli, KD and Hallowell-Zimmer, J (eds.), Ethical Issues in Archaeology, 316. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  116. 116Yates, D. 2018. Crowdsourcing Antiquities Crime Fighting: A Review of GlobalXplorer. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(2): 173178. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.8
  117. 117Zimmerman, LJ. 1992. Archaeology, reburial, and the tactics of a discipline’s self-delusion. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 16(2): 3756. DOI: 10.17953/aicr.16.2.fh3703j62v6238h0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.48 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 9, 2019
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2020
Published on: Apr 17, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Anna Cohen, Sarah Klassen, Damian Evans, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.